Why is a Constitutional Republic more proper than a democracy?

Into the Night said:
Mantra 1a. Argument of the Stone fallacy.

Democrats are communists and fascists. They are socialists.

The term "constitutional republic" is redundant.
There is no such thing as a "representative democracy". Democracies have no representatives.

False authority fallacy.

The President is not elected by popular vote.

There is none, except by Democrats. DON'T BLAME DEMOCRAT ELECTION FRAUD ON TRUMP!

Argument of the Stone fallacy. Bulverism fallacy.

Word games won't work.

DON'T TRY TO BLAME YOUR PROBLEMS ON ANYBODY ELSE!

DON'T TRY TO BLAME YOUR PROBLEMS ON ANYBODY ELSE!

Bulverism fallacy. Argument of the Stone fallacy.

Mantra 1a.

Mantra 1a. Bulverism fallacy. Argument of the Stone fallacy. Gaslighting.
Click to expand...

Incompetent rebuttal. Non substantive rebuttals are incompetent.
 
Publius said:
So, you lie, as well?
Click to expand...
Wow, you didn't need more than a couple of seconds for that pivot.

Publius said:
Thanks for telling me you have no friends, must be lonely for you.
Click to expand...
Well, I have one friend, i.e. you. I like hanging out with you on JPP. We make a good team. I like to add value by correcting errors, and you make a lot of errors. You are my "force multiplier."

Publius said:
You must be living in a right wing echo chamber bubble,
Click to expand...
Wrong again ... but keep trying.
 
Into the Night said:
Paradox. Irrational. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox.

Paradox. Irrational. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox.

That's TWO new paradoxes in ONE post!
Click to expand...
Which means that MAGAs is the PERFECT denomination for MAGAs. Somehow they are convinced that a proven rapist and convicted felon who attempted to overturn our democracy is the perfect person to bring law and order to this country.

More than a "paradox"... it's just plain hilarious!
 
Publius said:
Incompetent rebuttal; non substantive rebuttals are incompetent.
Click to expand...
Tipping your king already? You lost in only two moves.

giphy.webp
 
IBDaMann said:
Tipping your king already? You lost in only two moves.

giphy.webp
Click to expand...
Like I said, non substantive rebuttals are incompetent. Posturing is not an argument, it's a pseudo debate trick, and you pretend you are educated. Tsk tsk. You should ask for a refund or apologize to whomever/whatever funded your education.
 
Publius said:
So, you lie, as well? I explained to you why you can't be taken seriously, yet you refuse to accept it and you make up some shit so that you can feel better about your incompetence in the debate arena. How pathetic.

Oh, you're to blame, no question about that. You're not fooling anyone. You're not even honest.

Thanks for telling me you have no friends, must be lonely for you.

You must be living in a right wing echo chamber bubble, the kind where they withhold damning evidence. This is widely known. That, right there, tells me you are an incompetent debater.

If this doesn't prove Trump is a buffoon, you are beyond help.
Click to expand...
Insult fallacies. No argument presented.
 
Feynman Lives! said:
Which means that MAGAs is the PERFECT denomination for MAGAs.
Click to expand...
Paradox. Irrational.
Feynman Lives! said:
Somehow they are convinced that a proven rapist and convicted felon who attempted to overturn our democracy is the perfect person to bring law and order to this country.
Click to expand...
What "rapist"? What "convicted felon"? What democracy?
Feynman Lives! said:
More than a "paradox"... it's just plain hilarious!
Click to expand...
You can't clear your paradox by denying it, dummy.
 
Publius said:
Your sig is moronic.
Click to expand...
I like the part about the science of climatology being "magic".
IBDaMann said:
Global Warming violates the 1st LoT by claiming a magical substance magically creates thermal energy out of nothing, in the form of a temperature increase.
Click to expand...
It kinda screams for paraphrasing Arthur C. Clarke in some way. Let's see....

"Any sufficiently underdeveloped mind cannot distinguish science from magic."
 
Feynman Lives! said:
I like the part about the science of climatology being "magic".

It kinda screams for paraphrasing Arthur C. Clarke in some way. Let's see....

"Any sufficiently underdeveloped mind cannot distinguish science from magic."
Click to expand...
Too funny! Leave it to leftists to "mock" people who know so much more than they do. This is exactly the kind of post one would expect from a scientifically illiterate, mathematically incompetent and logically inept moron who thinks he a science genius. It's not as though you are going to be providing any science insights within this lifetime,
 
Into the Night said:
It is the same electoral college of the founders, dumbass.

The Senate is supposed to represent the States as States. The 17th amendment should be repealed.
Click to expand...
Into the Night said:
It is the same electoral college of the founders, dumbass.

The Senate is supposed to represent the States as States. The 17th amendment should be repealed.
Click to expand...

lol so you know you're just bs ing. Okay.The Senators as electors were elected by the other electors prior to the 17th. Gee, nothing corrupt about that, eh?
 
Publius said:
Incompetent rebuttal, has 'fallacy' on the brain to the exclusion of reality.
Dismissed.
Click to expand...

Into The Night's Fallacy fallacy. Thousands of them apparently. Never mind that formal logic is itself a formal fallacy, just circular reasoning, which is why there was that 2nd course of Introduction to Logic' covering informal logic, the better course. Most people just took 101 for the easy credit and never completed the intro sequence on logic in 102.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top