Why is Kavanaugh suited to sit on second highest Court, but not the Supreme Court

Truth Detector

Truth Detector

Well-known member
Contributor
No thread ban on this one.

Why was it okay for Bret to be nominated to the second highest court of the land, but now, he's not good enough for the Supreme Court?

Why is his temperament okay on the second highest court of the land but not the Supreme Court?
 
Seriously, you don't understand? Just because you can Captain a vessel, doesn't mean you could handle a fleet. The supreme court is much bigger, and a more scrutinized position. These stains on his record didn't come out till the Supreme Court, but it's not like it wouldn't have effected his fitness for lower courts either. Being from the failed W Bush administration, and having the composure of a wildebeest, I'd be pressed to think he could handle more then Judge Judy's job.
 
He showed he has no judicial temperament. He is not in control of his emotions., the bullshit he gave about neutrally calling balls and strikes was shown as false. he should sit on no bench.
 
Kavanaugh now needs to worry about being impeached from his current appellate court seat.

His, under oath, easily provable lies to congress are enough.
 
His career could be in jeopardy. "I like Beer, do you like Beer, mmmmmm Beer". This guy sounds like Homer Simpson.
 
Truth Detector said:
No thread ban on this one.

Why was it okay for Bret to be nominated to the second highest court of the land, but now, he's not good enough for the Supreme Court?

Why is his temperament okay on the second highest court of the land but not the Supreme Court?
Click to expand...

He should be in night traffic court!
He is a product of political parties controlling the justice system.
 
Anne and Margot said:
He should be in night traffic court!
He is a product of political parties controlling the justice system.
Click to expand...

Hmmm...

"Ginsburg, 85, is seen as one of the most staunchly liberal voices on the Supreme Court, and is something of a progressive cultural icon for her outspoken defense of left-wing causes. But she has also drawn censure for criticizing President Donald Trump."

http://time.com/5407757/ruth-bader-ginsburg-metoo-kavanaugh/


Not partisan? Really?
 
RB 60 said:
Hmmm...

"Ginsburg, 85, is seen as one of the most staunchly liberal voices on the Supreme Court, and is something of a progressive cultural icon for her outspoken defense of left-wing causes. But she has also drawn censure for criticizing President Donald Trump."

http://time.com/5407757/ruth-bader-ginsburg-metoo-kavanaugh/


Not partisan? Really?
Click to expand...

No!Because it's not political,any idiot can see Trump has no business being President.
 
Anne and Margot said:
No!Because it's not political,any idiot can see Trump has no business being President.
Click to expand...

maxresdefault.jpg
 
It is no use arguing with these cunts. Fuck it

If we have to wait until January when we have 57 GOP Senators then so be it

Hopefully by then Ginsburg and Breyer will have both died and then we can really stick it to the fucking libtards

Thomas can then safely retire and we can lock down that seat for 40 years

Then Kagan can die from her diabetes. Maybe get hypoglycemic and fall down a flight of stairs leading to a subdural hematoma and killing her

Then we will have an 8-1 Court


And these stupid fucks will be reduced to “packing the courts”
 
Jade Dragon said:
Seriously, you don't understand? Just because you can Captain a vessel, doesn't mean you could handle a fleet. The supreme court is much bigger, and a more scrutinized position. These stains on his record didn't come out till the Supreme Court, but it's not like it wouldn't have effected his fitness for lower courts either. Being from the failed W Bush administration, and having the composure of a wildebeest, I'd be pressed to think he could handle more then Judge Judy's job.
Click to expand...

There you go again, making things up. What "stains" on his record? The man has a flawless record and yet here you are flskey claiming there are stains on his record.

It is obvious that the Democratic Party of the Jackass has decided, in their desperation to remain relevant, to not just burn bridges, they want to burn the whole house down.
 
Nordberg said:
He showed he has no judicial temperament. He is not in control of his emotions., the bullshit he gave about neutrally calling balls and strikes was shown as false. he should sit on no bench.
Click to expand...

It's obvious you didn't watch the hearing. STFU, if I want a parrot for moronic MSNBC talking points I'll give you a call.
 
Truth Detector said:
No thread ban on this one.

Why was it okay for Bret to be nominated to the second highest court of the land, but now, he's not good enough for the Supreme Court?

Why is his temperament okay on the second highest court of the land but not the Supreme Court?
Click to expand...

he shouldn't be there


the Dems pointed out to the republicans when they appointed him last go round that he LIED in the vetting


the republicans didn't care


they like liars


the man should be disbarred


this guy better pull out himself

he may end up being prosecuted for his crimes if he allows the FBI investigation

he better run away
 
evince said:
he shouldn't be there


the Dems pointed out to the republicans when they appointed him last go round that he LIED in the vetting


the republicans didn't care


they like liars


the man should be disbarred


this guy better pull out himself

he may end up being prosecuted for his crimes if he allows the FBI investigation

he better run away
Click to expand...

You never have a coherent intelligent thought do you loony tune?
 
Trump Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh caught lying ...
www.palmerreport.com/analysis/lying-oath-brett-kavanaugh-supreme/11320

Donald Trump’s nomination of Brett Kavanaugh is falling apart by the hour – partly because Trump and his people rather obviously didn’t bother to do any real vetting of Kavanaugh while they were racing to try to hurry up and get him confirmed. The latest stunning revelation about Brett Kavanaugh is that he lied to the Senate in 2006.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top