Truck Fump / h1b
Verified User
I like Frank Apisa and I like U 2...is that allowed?
sure it is.
I like Frank Apisa and I like U 2...is that allowed?
He says to the guy who came from a conservative Mid West town/city (we could never make our minds), who end up being an Eastern Mystic (Zen, the TAO)......
ok.....what ever....
who says midwesterners can't be buddhist?
im from indiana.
Here is where my brain currently is located:
Frank Apisa is rooted in where he is from, and I like that.
because can expect he won't contaminate other places?......
because can expect he won't contaminate other places?......
The sound trak to my mind:
ahh, the bittersweet fire of life.
wolverine and firestar forever enmeshed.
ahh, hot pieces of ass with magic....I sure as shit could do with more of this!
I dont know where you are....If I had to pick three people here to share a pitcher of lemonade on the front porch then FRANK APISA is one of those guys.
Do U understand?
Sure, but the point is that Medicare for All isn't a far-left idea anymore. And generally speaking, the things that get normalized across the board in the West are good.
Our system treats healthcare as a commodity and a corporate business. It uses the 6 sigma methods and tries to lower costs by stockpiling as little as they can get away with. It provides a min of beds so they are not wasting profits on empty rooms. Cost-cutting for profit results in finding the cheapest doctors they can get and paying nurses and workers as little as possible. Healthcare is a right, not a for-profit business. We are the only industrial country that does this.
Insurance companies stand between customers and healthcare. They determine what treatments you can get. They pick your doctors and hospitals. They increase profits by denying treatment, so they do.
I agree with you on insurance. Honestly, I'd be ok with nationalizing all insurance, since it's the only industry where you profit more from denying service than providing it.
That's the issue though. The rest of the medical industry is mostly ok. Get rid of the insurance middlemen, and the problem is mostly solved. Now, if you want to create a public healthcare system that still leaves room for a competitive private one, then I'm ok with that. That's how France does it. It allows consumers to reap the benefits of each system.
I think the West has been going downhill culturally since the 2000s. The 90s were basically the apex of Western culture.
There will come a time when certain cultures outside of the West will rise to the top. We already see that Islamic culture will eventually replace parts of Europe, for example. Progressivism has reached a point where it is self-destructive. This is already beginning to show in things like birth rates and suicide rates.
It would be a good start. Then see how it works. Healthcare is a real fear for almost all Americans who are one illness away from financial disaster, even with insurance. To the rich, it is couch change. They see the people getting insurance coverage as costing them money. They fight that with religious zeal.
In what ways? If you mean art, that's subjective.
So I don't know if you're part of the Alt-Right, but this is a huge Alt-Right talking point that just isn't true for two reasons.
First, the amount of Muslims being taken in is extremely small. The Muslim population is less than 10% in Sweden, Germany, the UK, France, Denmark, Austria, the Netherlands, Belgium, and Norway. These are the countries the Alt-Right most cites as being flooded with Muslims.
Secondly, white Muslims are assimilating in Europe just like they're assimilating in America. Some European countries have already been majority Muslim for decades. Muslims make up the majority in Albania, Kosovo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and North Macedonia. These countries haven't replaced Western culture with Muslim culture. They still have Democracy and their native European cultures.
The insurance industry was quite fond of the ACA, actually. A lot of the medical industry was as well.
The people who fought the ACA were mostly those who understood that mandatory private insurance just means higher premiums.
The real fight involved here would be the insurance industry not wanting to lose its hold on the system. Those are the only "rich" to blame here.