BidenPresident
Verified User
However, as a matter of fact, Heidegger did come to the view that nothing (and its close cousin, being) really were contradictory objects.17 As he says in his personal notes of 1936–1938, subsequently published as Beiträge zur Philosophie:
"Non-being as a mode of being: it is and yet is not. And likewise being: permeated with the ‘not’ and yet it is. Those who fancy themselves only too clever and immediately uncover a contradiction here, since indeed non-beings cannot ‘be’, are thinking in much too narrow way with their ‘non-contradiction’ as the measure of the essence of beings."
https://iai.tv/articles/nothing-the...t-of-being-graham-priest-auid-2675?_auid=2020
"Non-being as a mode of being: it is and yet is not. And likewise being: permeated with the ‘not’ and yet it is. Those who fancy themselves only too clever and immediately uncover a contradiction here, since indeed non-beings cannot ‘be’, are thinking in much too narrow way with their ‘non-contradiction’ as the measure of the essence of beings."
https://iai.tv/articles/nothing-the...t-of-being-graham-priest-auid-2675?_auid=2020