Why libertarianism should be outlawed

M

MarcusA

Verified User
There are plenty of good reasons for this, for starters:

1. Libertarians bastardize "Rousseau" and promote the lie and myth that people are "naturally" good; not only is this antithetical to the philoosphy of the law and easily debunkable to the point that only denialism is the option, this also means that a libertarian is pro-pedophilia by default (e.x. the act of molesting a child is "natural", libertarians believe anything "natural" is good", therefore libertarians by that definition are in favor of pedophilia).


I'd argue this is a good enough reason by default, and that no others should even be necessary. Much like the degenerate left, the degenerate libertarians (a subset of the radical left) are a blight upon our existence and should not be allowed to perpetuate their lusts for feral vices such as sodomy, pedophila, and other forms of social illness; they are nothing but anathema to a true right-wing nationalist platform grounded in virtue, nation and state, above the feral and inferior ways of degenerate and decrepted mongrols who fancy them selves "individuals", when in actuality they are but akin to an infectuous disease whose "individuality" can easily be blighted with the barrel of a loaded gun if nation, state, church, God, virtue deem it necessary.
 
Last edited:
MarcusA said:
There are plenty of good reasons for this, for starters:

1. Libertarians bastardize "Rousseau" and promote the lie and myth that people are "naturally" good; not only is this antithetical to the philoosphy of the law and easily debunkable to the point that only denialism is the option, this also means that a libertarian is pro-pedophilia by default (e.x. the act of molesting a child is "natural", libertarians believe anything "natural" is good", therefore libertarians by that definition are in favor of pedophilia).


I'd argue this is a good enough reason by default, and that no others should even be necessary. Much like the degenerate left, the degenerate libertarians (a subset of the radical left) are a blight upon our existence and should not be allowed to perpetuate their lusts for feral vices such as sodomy, pedophila, and other forms of social illness; they are nothing but anathema to a true right-wing nationalist platform grounded in virtue, nation and state, above the feral and inferior ways of degenerate and decrepted mongrols who fancy them selves "individuals", when in actuality they are but akin to an infectuous disease whose "individuality" can easily be blighted with the barrel of a loaded gun if nation, state, church, God, virtue deem it necessary.
Click to expand...

only after the democrat and republican parties are outlawed,,,
 
MarcusA said:
There are plenty of good reasons for this, for starters:

1. Libertarians bastardize "Rousseau" and promote the lie and myth that people are "naturally" good; not only is this antithetical to the philoosphy of the law and easily debunkable to the point that only denialism is the option, this also means that a libertarian is pro-pedophilia by default (e.x. the act of molesting a child is "natural", libertarians believe anything "natural" is good", therefore libertarians by that definition are in favor of pedophilia).


I'd argue this is a good enough reason by default, and that no others should even be necessary. Much like the degenerate left, the degenerate libertarians (a subset of the radical left) are a blight upon our existence and should not be allowed to perpetuate their lusts for feral vices such as sodomy, pedophila, and other forms of social illness; they are nothing but anathema to a true right-wing nationalist platform grounded in virtue, nation and state, above the feral and inferior ways of degenerate and decrepted mongrols who fancy them selves "individuals", when in actuality they are but akin to an infectuous disease whose "individuality" can easily be blighted with the barrel of a loaded gun if nation, state, church, God, virtue deem it necessary.
Click to expand...

Rad Trad cuckery.
 
Outlawing libertarianism would be like compulsory voting or making attempted suicide punishable by death.
 
MarcusA said:
There are plenty of good reasons for this, for starters:

1. Libertarians bastardize "Rousseau" and promote the lie and myth that people are "naturally" good
Click to expand...

That's not really what libertarianism is based on. The idea is that people should be free to make their own decisions. That doesn't mean that their decisions will always be good, but the only decisions that should be prohibited are ones that infringe on other people's freedoms. Most libertarians don't believe that children should be treated the same as adults, so they wouldn't be in favor of pedophilia. Most libertarians view consent in the same terms that other people do, in that minors can't give consent to sexual acts when it involves adults. Technically, they can give consent to this when only among other minors (within a certain age range), however.
 
MarcusA said:
There are plenty of good reasons for this, for starters:

1. Libertarians bastardize "Rousseau" and promote the lie and myth that people are "naturally" good; not only is this antithetical to the philoosphy of the law and easily debunkable to the point that only denialism is the option, this also means that a libertarian is pro-pedophilia by default (e.x. the act of molesting a child is "natural", libertarians believe anything "natural" is good", therefore libertarians by that definition are in favor of pedophilia).


I'd argue this is a good enough reason by default, and that no others should even be necessary. Much like the degenerate left, the degenerate libertarians (a subset of the radical left) are a blight upon our existence and should not be allowed to perpetuate their lusts for feral vices such as sodomy, pedophila, and other forms of social illness; they are nothing but anathema to a true right-wing nationalist platform grounded in virtue, nation and state, above the feral and inferior ways of degenerate and decrepted mongrols who fancy them selves "individuals", when in actuality they are but akin to an infectuous disease whose "individuality" can easily be blighted with the barrel of a loaded gun if nation, state, church, God, virtue deem it necessary.
Click to expand...

Maybe you would feel more comfortable in some utopian Fascistic dictatorship? :palm:
 
Marcusa you're tripping. totalotarianism is not the answer.

more speech is the answer. we must argue it out every damn day.

"He who fights with monsters should be careful lest he thereby become a monster. And if thou gaze long into an abyss, the abyss will also gaze into thee." --neechy
 
Truth Detector said:
While I disagree with the thread premise, Libertarianism fails because it promotes anarchy. ;)
Click to expand...

libertarians are not anarchists. they still love the fiat currency backed by the government. they used to make noises about sound currency, now they're mostly just typical globalist neocons who are fine with weed.
 
AssHatZombie said:
libertarians are not anarchists. they still love the fiat currency backed by the government. they used to make noises about sound currency, now they're mostly just typical globalist neocons who are fine with weed.
Click to expand...

In order to be a libertarian, you have to support anarchy. That's not an opinion, that is a fact. ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top