Why libertarianism should be outlawed

only control junkie narcissists hate freedom........................that would include democrats and republicans..................you idiots feel that the people must be controlled through force............makes you like hitler or mussolini............stalin even.........

Oh, thank the gods.

YOU are a Libertarian.

Whew.

Confirmation that I am correct in my feelings about it.
 
I repeat: Personally, I fear the impact of Libertarianism more than that of the American right...and I think the American right is leading us to a Hitler style of rule.

Why?? They have no power anywhere outside the media & some hovels in academia........
 
only control junkie narcissists hate freedom........................that would include democrats and republicans..................you idiots feel that the people must be controlled through force............makes you like hitler or mussolini............stalin even.........

So how was your stay at Chop? Learn anything about what uncontrolled anarchy is really like. :palm:
 
I repeat: Personally, I fear the impact of Libertarianism more than that of the American right...and I think the American right is leading us to a Hitler style of rule.

It's obvious you don't think when you erupt with patently stupid lunacy like this. :palm:
 
Why?? They have no power anywhere outside the media & some hovels in academia........

I am not talking about a "they"...I am talking about an "it."

Libertarianism is an IT. And it causes me to be very, very cautious.

My guess is there are more people who consider themselves libertarians than you suppose right now. My fear is that, like Trump, it will gain appeal even though it is the dregs of the planet.
 
I am not talking about a "they"...I am talking about an "it."

Libertarianism is an IT. And it causes me to be very, very cautious.

My guess is there are more people who consider themselves libertarians than you suppose right now. My fear is that, like Trump, it will gain appeal even though it is the dregs of the planet.

It won't. The Right isn't actually about "small government," it's about using the government to enforce a hierarchy. That's why actual small government guys like Ron Paul always get around 4% of the vote when they run for president.
Though at this point, I think I'd prefer lolbert lunacy to Trumpian Fascism.
 
There are plenty of good reasons for this, for starters:

1. Libertarians bastardize "Rousseau" and promote the lie and myth that people are "naturally" good; not only is this antithetical to the philoosphy of the law and easily debunkable to the point that only denialism is the option, this also means that a libertarian is pro-pedophilia by default (e.x. the act of molesting a child is "natural", libertarians believe anything "natural" is good", therefore libertarians by that definition are in favor of pedophilia).


I'd argue this is a good enough reason by default, and that no others should even be necessary. Much like the degenerate left, the degenerate libertarians (a subset of the radical left) are a blight upon our existence and should not be allowed to perpetuate their lusts for feral vices such as sodomy, pedophila, and other forms of social illness; they are nothing but anathema to a true right-wing nationalist platform grounded in virtue, nation and state, above the feral and inferior ways of degenerate and decrepted mongrols who fancy them selves "individuals", when in actuality they are but akin to an infectuous disease whose "individuality" can easily be blighted with the barrel of a loaded gun if nation, state, church, God, virtue deem it necessary.

This from a Fascist
 
I am not talking about a "they"...I am talking about an "it."

Libertarianism is an IT. And it causes me to be very, very cautious.

My guess is there are more people who consider themselves libertarians than you suppose right now. My fear is that, like Trump, it will gain appeal even though it is the dregs of the planet.

I have had the pleasure of dealing w/ several......

It depends on degree I suppose.....

Many have the ability to take it to the extreme illogical conclusion.......
 
While I disagree with the thread premise, Libertarianism fails because it promotes anarchy. ;)

I would say it fails for a different reason -- it doesn't take into account certain externalities.

Libertarianism would be the best philosophy in the world, if every nation was libertarian. Since the world is much more Machiavellian than that, libertarianism works better within a very limited context. It serves well for the sake of things like personal freedoms and limiting certain aspects of government. It doesn't work so well with regard to foreign policy or immigration policy.
 
libertarians are not anarchists. they still love the fiat currency backed by the government. they used to make noises about sound currency, now they're mostly just typical globalist neocons who are fine with weed.

Depends on the libertarian. A lot of them are really into bitcoin. Also, many libertarians advocate for competing currencies with no government backing. Granted, the line between libertarian and anarcho-capitalist is blurred.
 
Libertarianism is a sure-fire train to chaos and anarchy.

I cannot see how libertarianism can be held in check to avoid that excess.

Personally, I fear the impact of Libertarianism more than that of the American right...and I think the American right is leading us to a Hitler style of rule.

That seems like an odd thing to fear, when considering that libertarianism is very similar to Classical Liberalism, which is the basis of our society.

Granted, I realize that modern progressivism has steered us pretty far away from Classical Liberalism and more toward statism.
 
Depends on the libertarian. A lot of them are really into bitcoin. Also, many libertarians advocate for competing currencies with no government backing. Granted, the line between libertarian and anarcho-capitalist is blurred.


being into bitcoin is very far from anarchy.

libertarians talk about sound currencies, but still insist that the corporations that run on this devil fuel are morally pure cuz trade.
 
being into bitcoin is very far from anarchy.

libertarians talk about sound currencies, but still insist that the corporations that run on this devil fuel are morally pure cuz trade.

Some might fit that, but plenty of libertarians have figured out the issues with corporate law. It's a similar problem with regard to intellectual property laws.
 
don't worry. as a functional party,they're clowns. their candidate has already screwed the pooch.

but they support blm and dems should vote for them.

I would agree that their party leadership has unfortunately pandered to identity politics. They're apparently following the lead of woke capitalism.
 
It won't. The Right isn't actually about "small government," it's about using the government to enforce a hierarchy. That's why actual small government guys like Ron Paul always get around 4% of the vote when they run for president.
Though at this point, I think I'd prefer lolbert lunacy to Trumpian Fascism.

If you have an issue with hierarchies, you shouldn't like the progressive one either. Their hierarchy is about pandering to whatever the identity group of the week is. If you happen to be white and cisgender, you're near the bottom of that hierarchy.
 
If you have an issue with hierarchies, you shouldn't like the progressive one either. Their hierarchy is about pandering to whatever the identity group of the week is. If you happen to be white and cisgender, you're near the bottom of that hierarchy.

I don't really think SJW Progressives are that common. The so-called Anti-SJW movement just sees SJW things everywhere. Marvel releases like 20 movies where the main character is a male, then they release Captain Marvel, and Anti-SJW YouTube goes nuts about WOKE FEMINISM. Pretty soon, after all the movies with straight superheroes, we're going to get a movie with a gay superhero, and the Right will rant and rave about how cisgender males are being pushed out of cinema.
 
I don't really think SJW Progressives are that common. The so-called Anti-SJW movement just sees SJW things everywhere. Marvel releases like 20 movies where the main character is a male, then they release Captain Marvel, and Anti-SJW YouTube goes nuts about WOKE FEMINISM. Pretty soon, after all the movies with straight superheroes, we're going to get a movie with a gay superhero, and the Right will rant and rave about how cisgender males are being pushed out of cinema.

I would agree that some of the reactions by the right on those things are ridiculous, although the power of woke capitalism is very real. People have lost their jobs over disagreeing with BLM, for example.

The hierarchy might not always be government enforced, but it's widespread enough in the economy that you basically have to maintain certain views (or stay silent) to keep in the good graces of the progressive hierarchy.
 
I would agree that some of the reactions by the right on those things are ridiculous, although the power of woke capitalism is very real. People have lost their jobs over disagreeing with BLM, for example.

The hierarchy might not always be government enforced, but it's widespread enough in the economy that you basically have to maintain certain views (or stay silent) to keep in the good graces of the progressive hierarchy.

You have to buy into the anti-white narrative. But other than that, I don't think Woke Capitalism is a thing. At the very most, corporations are seeing that girls read comic books and watch superhero movies too, so now they're creating more stories with female protagonists. Not because they want to brag about being woke, but because they like making money.
 
Back
Top