Why now?

[gfm7175]

We are the leftist dipshits doing this now? Where were the concerns about Brandon's mental acuity when it mattered and why are they now so willing to talk about it? I remember that one idiot Scarborough saying we were seeing the sharpest Biden ever. LMFAO if that was true it wasn't a compliment.

Joe Biden, Jake Tapper, and the Lampshading of America » The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics

Former President Joe Biden is old. Have you heard the news? It’s all the rave in the media today. That can largely be attributed to a new book, Original Sin:

spectator.org

They're doing it now because they're getting their "reward money" for it now... it's their kickback for following orders to vehemently deny it during the years that it mattered to deny it.

 

[Truth Detector]

do you deny that the constitution gives trade agreement power to the president?

I do. Can you provide the article or section that gives that authority to the Executive?

However, that being the case, Congress did delegate that authority long ago.

 

[Truth Detector]

Not entirely, but with regards to tariffs, yes. His only power is what was given to him by Congress.

Trump to hit Mexico with tariffs in anti-immigration measure

The US president says he will impose rising tariffs until Mexico ends illegal immigration to the US.

www.bbc.com

What power do you believe they delegated? I've given you evidence that all Tariff powers have been delegated since the 1930's

 

[Truth Detector]

Dont want to answer the question? I understand...

Insults are a good place to turn when your ignorance is exposed.

You've been ignoring the correct answers throughout this thread.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

Wrong. But Congress did delegate that authority back in 1913 after the income tax was passed and Tariffs were no longer a principle source of Federal income.

How Congress delegates its tariff powers to the president​

How Congress delegates its tariff powers to the president | Constitution Center

President Donald Trump is expected to announce wide-sweeping tariffs on Wednesday, in a move with potentially broad consequences. So how does the president have the ability to levy tariffs under the Constitution?

constitutioncenter.org

wrong. libertarian globalist fuckface addict.

Interpretation: Article II, Section 2: Treaty Power and Appointments | Constitution Center

Interpretations of Article II, Section 2: Treaty Power and Appointments by constitutional scholars

constitutioncenter.org

For instance, the authority to negotiate treaties has been assigned to the President alone as part of a general authority to control diplomatic communications. Thus, since the early Republic, the Clause has not been interpreted to give the Senate a constitutionally mandated role in advising the President before the conclusion of the treaty.

 

[Truth Detector]

we're taking about the constitution.

the constitution clearly gives the president the sole power of trade agreement.

do you deny this fact.

deny it first before I do busywork.

I don't do busywork.

Wrong. See above.

 

[Jarod]

What power do you believe they delegated? I've given you evidence that all Tariff powers have been delegated since the 1930's

The first paragraph of your own post says that Congress has that power under Article 1, Section 8 of the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

What power do you believe they delegated? I've given you evidence that all Tariff powers have been delegated since the 1930's

there president never lost the power of trade agreement.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

Wrong. See above.

Interpretation: Article II, Section 2: Treaty Power and Appointments | Constitution Center

Interpretations of Article II, Section 2: Treaty Power and Appointments by constitutional scholars

constitutioncenter.org

 

[Truth Detector]

wrong. libertarian globalist fuckface addict.

Interpretation: Article II, Section 2: Treaty Power and Appointments | Constitution Center

Interpretations of Article II, Section 2: Treaty Power and Appointments by constitutional scholars

constitutioncenter.org

For instance, the authority to negotiate treaties has been assigned to the President alone as part of a general authority to control diplomatic communications. Thus, since the early Republic, the Clause has not been interpreted to give the Senate a constitutionally mandated role in advising the President before the conclusion of the treaty.

A brainless and unhinged response. This isn't about negotiating treaties you brainless twit.

Can you provide the section of the Constitution that gave the executive Tariff authority?

 

[Jarod]

we're taking about the constitution.

the constitution clearly gives the president the sole power of trade agreement.

do you deny this fact.

deny it first before I do busywork.

I don't do busywork.

Article 1, Section 8, United States Constitution.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

Wrong. See above.

the president has never NOT EXCLUSIVELY had the power of trade negotiations.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

A brainless and unhinged response. This isn't about negotiating treaties you brainless twit.

Can you provide the section of the Constitution that gave the executive Tariff authority?

Tariff is part of treaty power, globalist traitor fucktoid secret never trumpoer globalist shill piller.

 

[Truth Detector]

The first paragraph of your own post says that Congress has that power under Article 1, Section 8 of the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.

That wasn't the question. You claimed that they delegated that authority. I am arguing that they indeed have, but you seem to believe that it is only partial.

This is not a constitutional question, it is a delegation of authority question. The Congress long ago delegated that authority after the passage of the income tax. It was no longer a primary source of Federal income so Congress delegated it to the Executive.

I am still waiting to see what OPNION these DISTRICT COURT activist jurists provided that had anything to do with the law.

 

[Truth Detector]

there president never lost the power of trade agreement.

This isn't about trade agreements or treaties dumbass, it is about Tariff authority which was a power of the Congress, not the executive.

Congress subsequently DELEGATED that authority to the Executive when Tariffs were no longer a primary source of income to fund the government.

 

[Truth Detector]

Interpretation: Article II, Section 2: Treaty Power and Appointments | Constitution Center

Interpretations of Article II, Section 2: Treaty Power and Appointments by constitutional scholars

constitutioncenter.org

We're not talking about treaties moron.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

Article 1, Section 8, United States Constitution.

article II section 2.

He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur;

 

[Sammy Jankis]

This isn't about trade agreements or treaties dumbass, it is about Tariff authority which was a power of the Congress, not the executive.

Congress subsequently DELEGATED that authority to the Executive when Tariffs were no longer a primary source of income to fund the government.

a tariff is a detail of a trade agreement.

libertarian globalist shit eat.

typical arrogant fucking word games.

 

[Truth Detector]

the president has never NOT EXCLUSIVELY had the power of trade negotiations.

Again, this isn't about "trade negotiations", it is about the authority to levy tariffs which was in the exclusive authority of Congress.

They subsequently DELEGATED that authority to the Executive. I don't know if English is your first language because you seem to have a severe case of not comprehending the written word.

 

[Truth Detector]

Tariff is part of treaty power, globalist traitor fucktoid secret never trumpoer globalist shill piller.

Wrong. Tariffs are duties placed on foreign imports and typically used to protect domestic production.

You're not very smart which would explain your inability to comprehend the obvious.