Why So Many American Jews Politically Liberal

Guno צְבִי

We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
The post-war politics of American Jews were shaped more by Jewish experience than Jewish tradition.


Lawrence Fuchs argued that liberalism emerged ineluctably from Jewish values, which stressed the importance of charity and social justice.

Prior to the late nineteenth century, the Jewish political orientation in Europe and the Arab lands was passive. Jews feared the state and were detached from political involvement. Since the parties of the left in Europe in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries favored Jewish emancipation and opposed anti‑Semitism, Jews naturally supported the political left and distrusted the political establishment, which was often anti‑Semitic. In addition, the growth in Europe of an urban Jewish proletariat in the late nineteenth century encouraged Jews to look to various forms of socialism as panaceas for their economic and social difficulties

These liberal and leftist political impulses were reinforced when Jews migrated to America. The Forward, the most important Yiddish daily paper, was a socialist journal. It had on its masthead the slogan, “Workers of the World Unite.” The political left in America, particularly during the 1930s, identified itself with the interests of what were termed the “urban masses,” which included Jews. In addition, the fact that Franklin D. Roose*velt led America into war against Hitler intensified Jewish support for the liberal wing of the Democratic party. Jews, judge Jonah Goldstein jested, had three velts (worlds): die velt (this world), yene velt (the other world), and Roosevelt.

With good reason, Jews identified anti‑Semitism with the right. This accounted for their interpretation of Nazism as a right‑wing, reactionary movement, despite the fact that the word Nazism stood for National Socialism. In addition, they attributed the rise of Hitler to the economic and social dislocations caused by the Great Depression. A society that provided good housing, jobs, unemployment insurance, health care, and educational opportunities would, they believed, be less immune to anti‑Semitic demagogues. Liberalism was thus a bulwark against anti‑Semitism.

https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/jews-and-liberal-politics/
 
I think it is because when the blacks were being crushed by America, the jews related to the mistreatment of a society. Jews had it horrible in Germany and still had it here. They had some empathy for the blacks mistreatment, When the civil rights marches were first starting, it was Jews who organized them. They were important in the beginning. It was Stokley Charmichael and Malcom X who decided to drive jews and other whites out or the leadership positions. They knew their future could be improved if they were in charge and able to organize. They did not want the appaearance to be, they were following orders and it suggested they were not capable of running it themselves.
Wealthy whites were making profit off the mistreatment of blacks and other minorities. They controlled the police and the courts. That is the birthright of the wealthy.
 
Wealthy whites were making profit off the mistreatment of blacks and other minorities. They controlled the police and the courts. That is the birthright of the wealthy.
Democrats will never change. They still think that rich make money off of the poor. That's why they were slavers back in the day. Slavery is no longer legal, thanks to the GOP, so they promise the poor free stuff, which of course keeps them poor.
 
Democrats will never change. They still think that rich make money off of the poor. That's why they were slavers back in the day. Slavery is no longer legal, thanks to the GOP, so they promise the poor free stuff, which of course keeps them poor.

You will never learn. And of course, you make no sense.
 
Democrats will never change. They still think that rich make money off of the poor. That's why they were slavers back in the day. Slavery is no longer legal, thanks to the GOP, so they promise the poor free stuff, which of course keeps them poor.

There is so much wrong with this post, it's actually brilliant.
 
Because they are not religious.

Oh that's not true.. Religious people also support social justice. What do you think the Sermon on the Mount was about? Jesus was preaching non-violent resistance to the Romans. Gandhi and Martin Luther King both studies the Sermon on the Mount extensively.

Religious Jews HATED the Roman oppression of the first century..
 
Democrats will never change. They still think that rich make money off of the poor. That's why they were slavers back in the day. Slavery is no longer legal, thanks to the GOP, so they promise the poor free stuff, which of course keeps them poor.

When you say "slavers" do you mean the Dutch, Spanish, Portuguese and English slavers?
 
Oh that's not true.. Religious people also support social justice. What do you think the Sermon on the Mount was about? Jesus was preaching non-violent resistance to the Romans. Gandhi and Martin Luther King both studies the Sermon on the Mount extensively.

Religious Jews HATED the Roman oppression of the first century..

Wow you don't know your New Testament history at all. The highest level Jewish priests were corrupt and relied on the Romans to kill off the insurrection (Jesus).
 
Wow you don't know your New Testament history at all. The highest level Jewish priests were corrupt and relied on the Romans to kill off the insurrection (Jesus).

They were a tiny minority.. Jesus spent most of his ministry in the north around Galilee and the cities of the Decapolis.

Jesus was NOT an advocate of insurrection.. He was trying to quiet the different Jewish factions that were fighting each other and the Romans... You know the Pharisees, Saducees, Herodians, Zealots, Sicari and Essenes.. Well, to be accurate.. the Essenes simply withdrew to the desert.
 
The post-war politics of American Jews were shaped more by Jewish experience than Jewish tradition.


Lawrence Fuchs argued that liberalism emerged ineluctably from Jewish values, which stressed the importance of charity and social justice.

Prior to the late nineteenth century, the Jewish political orientation in Europe and the Arab lands was passive. Jews feared the state and were detached from political involvement. Since the parties of the left in Europe in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries favored Jewish emancipation and opposed anti‑Semitism, Jews naturally supported the political left and distrusted the political establishment, which was often anti‑Semitic. In addition, the growth in Europe of an urban Jewish proletariat in the late nineteenth century encouraged Jews to look to various forms of socialism as panaceas for their economic and social difficulties

These liberal and leftist political impulses were reinforced when Jews migrated to America. The Forward, the most important Yiddish daily paper, was a socialist journal. It had on its masthead the slogan, “Workers of the World Unite.” The political left in America, particularly during the 1930s, identified itself with the interests of what were termed the “urban masses,” which included Jews. In addition, the fact that Franklin D. Roose*velt led America into war against Hitler intensified Jewish support for the liberal wing of the Democratic party. Jews, judge Jonah Goldstein jested, had three velts (worlds): die velt (this world), yene velt (the other world), and Roosevelt.

With good reason, Jews identified anti‑Semitism with the right. This accounted for their interpretation of Nazism as a right‑wing, reactionary movement, despite the fact that the word Nazism stood for National Socialism. In addition, they attributed the rise of Hitler to the economic and social dislocations caused by the Great Depression. A society that provided good housing, jobs, unemployment insurance, health care, and educational opportunities would, they believed, be less immune to anti‑Semitic demagogues. Liberalism was thus a bulwark against anti‑Semitism.

https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/jews-and-liberal-politics/

What do you think of Rep. Omar's claim of many Jews having dual loyalty and the charges of anti-semitism against her?
 
What do you think of Rep. Omar's claim of many Jews having dual loyalty and the charges of anti-semitism against her?

Well, look at the signatories of the 1998 PNAC letter to Clinton... Its straight out of Bibi's Clean Break Strategy..

Do you remember when Bibi said that Obama was a "damned J Street Jew"?
 
Well, look at the signatories of the 1998 PNAC letter to Clinton... Its straight out of Bibi's Clean Break Strategy..

Do you remember when Bibi said that Obama was a "damned J Street Jew"?

Ok. What does that have to do with me asking guno his opinion on Rep Omar and her comments?
 
She's young and full of vinegar, but there is a lot of truth in what she says.
I abhor what they are doing to her. It isn’t anti-Semitism, it’s anti- Zionism, I wish our legislators would realize this. I wish people were educated on the difference.
 
I abhor what they are doing to her. It isn’t anti-Semitism, it’s anti- Zionism, I wish our legislators would realize this. I wish people were educated on the difference.

I agree with you, but they don't care about the difference.
 
Back
Top