Why tax cuts DO create jobs!

You can deny anything you want.
It doesn't mean that just because you deny it, that it isn't the truth.
The fact that you can't even understand that you are a dumbass, shows what a dumbass you're being.

MY COMMENT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE CONVOLUTED WORLD YOU'VE CREATED FOR YOURSELF AND INSTEAD, WAS TO HER COMMENT REGARDING THE US BEING UNABLE TO PRODUCE WHAT WE MAY NEED.

But you go ahead and stay on that river DENIAL; but it doesn't change the fact that you're a dumbass and it's become obvious that you actually hate the US.


No. Your comments were completely unrelated, and did nothing to invalidate her point. I challenge you to explain it again. I challenge anyone reading this to make sense of your irrelevant rant.


According to you, being concerned about losing key abilities is "being japanese". MMMMMkay.
 
Why do you ignore the findings of the very people who should be considered?

You know the brightest economists of our time?

take a look at who runs the Wall Street Investment banks and a good chunk of Congress... it is those same Ivy league morons that you are quoting.

Show me why it is you think that harvard economist is one of the brightest of our time.
 
There you have it.

The premere argument of the braindead.

Spew hate and denial all over any logical and educated person who challenges the lies of the failed ideas of the right.

You are one of the worst enimies the country has.

Fact adverse and willing to dismiss ANYTHING that shows the hot light of truth.

give me a break desh... you ignore EVERYTHING that disagrees with the failed policies of the Democrats. you do exactly what you project onto him. you are 100% closed minded to anything that disagrees with what your masters tell you.
 
There you have it.

The premere argument of the braindead.

Spew hate and denial all over any logical and educated person who challenges the lies of the failed ideas of the right.

You are one of the worst enimies the country has.

Fact adverse and willing to dismiss ANYTHING that shows the hot light of truth.

first, let's dispense with the hyperbole before you sprain your brain.

second, try to remember that i'm not 'on the right'

third, you still didn't answer the question. all you did was spew insults because I called on you to support your premise and argument.
 
first, let's dispense with the hyperbole before you sprain your brain.

second, try to remember that i'm not 'on the right'

third, you still didn't answer the question. all you did was spew insults because I called on you to support your premise and argument.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

you are not on the right?

Then why the fuck are you dismissing this study at the drop of a hat?
 
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

you are not on the right?

Then why the fuck are you dismissing this study at the drop of a hat?

i'm dismissing the study at the drop of a hat because you're support of it exists SOLELY upon the premise that it's done by a university. I have no trust in some idiot with letters after his name, especially when he/she doesn't face the reality that exists in my home and finances.
 
Why Government Spending Does Not Stimulate Economic Growth: Answering the CriticsPublished on January 5, 2010 by Brian Riedl

Abstract: Despite decades of repeated failure, President Obama and Congress continue to promote the myth that government can spend its way out of recession. Heritage Foundation economic policy expert Brian Riedl dispels the stimulus myth, lays out the evidence that government spending does not end recessions--and presents the evidence for what does end recessions. Hint: It's not another "stimulus package."

Proponents of President Barack Obama's $787 billion stimulus bill continue to insist that the massive government bailout played a decisive role in moving the economy out of the recession. Yet assuming no destructive government actions, the economy's self-correction mechanism was widely expected to move the economy out of recession in 2009 anyway. With a parade of "stimulus" bills the past two years (going back to President George W. Bush's tax rebate in early 2008), it was entirely predictable that some would link the expected end of the recession to whichever stimulus bill happened to come last.

Indeed, President Obama's stimulus bill failed by its own standards. In a January 2009 report, White House economists predicted that the stimulus bill would create (not merely save) 3.3 million net jobs by 2010. Since then, 3.5 million more net jobs have been lost, pushing the unemployment rate above 10 percent.[1] The fact that government failed to spend its way to prosperity is not an isolated incident:

During the 1930s, New Deal lawmakers doubled federal spending--yet unemployment remained above 20 percent until World War II.
Japan responded to a 1990 recession by passing 10 stimulus spending bills over 8 years (building the largest national debt in the industrialized world)--yet its economy remained stagnant.
In 2001, President Bush responded to a recession by "injecting" tax rebates into the economy. The economy did not respond until two years later, when tax rate reductions were implemented.
In 2008, President Bush tried to head off the current recession with another round of tax rebates. The recession continued to worsen.
Now, the most recent $787 billion stimulus bill was intended to keep the unemployment rate from exceeding 8 percent. In November, it topped 10 percent.[2]
Undeterred by these repeated stimulus failures, President Obama is calling for yet another stimulus bill.[3] There is every reason to expect another round to fail as miserably as the past ones, and it would bury the nation deeper in debt.
 
If Paris Hilton tax cuts create jobs where are they? Bush's tax cuts for his base have been in effect for years. It should have created jobs in America and strengthened our economy by now according to right-wing propaganda. The tax cuts did create jobs and wealth, in China not in America.

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
Albert Einstein
 
If Paris Hilton tax cuts create jobs where are they? Bush's tax cuts for his base have been in effect for years. It should have created jobs in America and strengthened our economy by now according to right-wing propaganda. The tax cuts did create jobs and wealth, in China not in America.

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
Albert Einstein

how many regulations and what type of them made costs of manufacturing items in the US profit prohibitive?
 
how many regulations and what type of them made costs of manufacturing items in the US profit prohibitive?

Here we go with union bashing again. If you were smarter than everybody else you wouldn't ask stupid questions. Do your own research on how conservative ideology has destroyed this country or just look at our unemployment and the state this country is in. You are only as smart as Faux news lets you be.

To answer your ignorant question for the last time... the lure of slave labor and subsidies in communist china drove manufacturing there at the expense of American labor. The right has betrayed this country and I consider you traitors.
 
Here we go with union bashing again.
where did I bash unions? oh, I didn't. so you're just seeing what will stick.

If you were smarter than everybody else you wouldn't ask stupid questions. Do your own research on how conservative ideology has destroyed this country or just look at our unemployment and the state this country is in. You are only as smart as Faux news lets you be.
again, some of you idiots show amazing memory issues because you can't fucking remember I'm a Libertarian.

To answer your ignorant question for the last time... the lure of slave labor and subsidies in communist china drove manufacturing there at the expense of American labor. The right has betrayed this country and I consider you traitors.

hey dumbass, that argument would have a better chance of getting Asshat to agree with you than anything considered even remotely intelligent.
 
I was looking for the explosion in government borrowing and spending attendant thereto, but I'll take it.

There was an explosion of government spending in the 1930's that did nothing to stimulate the economy. Roosevelt took over in 33, when the fed spending was about $4.6B. By 1936 it was $8.2B. By '41 it was over $13B. Yet none of that brought us out.

Yes, we increased spending dramatically during the War, upping the spending to a peak of $92B in 45. By 1947 it had dropped back to $34B with revenues of $38B.

Obviously many things led to our continued success after the war, but it was largely driven by the fact that our land and plants etc... were left unscathed by the War (with the exception of the damage at Pearl). The other powers were all facing massive rebuilding efforts. The Marshall plan provided a great opportunity as trade barriers and insane tarriffs were eliminated. Which propelled Europe into an age of prosperity. In addition, the technology created during the War spilled over into the private sector. Add to that the housing boom created by the low interest rate loans to returning GI's and you can see it wasn't massive government spending, but rather the start of the tech revolution that created the prosperity.

The government was able to spend at the levels it did due to the revenues produced by that revolution.

It wasn't until 1959 that Fed spending got back to the peak spending years of WWII.
 
LOL! Libertarian, just another failed conservative ideology created by Koch sponsored 'think tanks' in order to placate disgruntled conservative idiots.

"hey dumbass, that argument would have a better chance of getting Asshat to agree with you than anything considered even remotely intelligent."

After years of tax breaks for Bush's Base and 30 years of trickle-down please explain to me how your conservative libertarian globalization ideology has done anything but bring this country to its knees. Explain to me how it's helped anyone in this country except maybe Paris Hilton and international globalists.
 
There was an explosion of government spending in the 1930's that did nothing to stimulate the economy. Roosevelt took over in 33, when the fed spending was about $4.6B. By 1936 it was $8.2B. By '41 it was over $13B. Yet none of that brought us out.

Yes, we increased spending dramatically during the War, upping the spending to a peak of $92B in 45. By 1947 it had dropped back to $34B with revenues of $38B.

Obviously many things led to our continued success after the war, but it was largely driven by the fact that our land and plants etc... were left unscathed by the War (with the exception of the damage at Pearl). The other powers were all facing massive rebuilding efforts. The Marshall plan provided a great opportunity as trade barriers and insane tarriffs were eliminated. Which propelled Europe into an age of prosperity. In addition, the technology created during the War spilled over into the private sector. Add to that the housing boom created by the low interest rate loans to returning GI's and you can see it wasn't massive government spending, but rather the start of the tech revolution that created the prosperity.

The government was able to spend at the levels it did due to the revenues produced by that revolution.

It wasn't until 1959 that Fed spending got back to the peak spending years of WWII.


So what you're telling me is that stuff happened before the explosion of government spending associated with WWII and then stuff happened after WWII?

OK.

Thanks.
 
LOL! Libertarian, just another failed conservative ideology created by Koch sponsored 'think tanks' in order to placate disgruntled conservative idiots.
I was Libertarian before Libertarian was cool.


After years of tax breaks for Bush's Base and 30 years of trickle-down please explain to me how your conservative libertarian globalization ideology has done anything but bring this country to its knees. Explain to me how it's helped anyone in this country except maybe Paris Hilton and international globalists.

you forgot to add totalitarian statist fascist communist and maybe a few others.

pretty broad group you got there. obviously you're not looking for answers, just throwing insinuations.
 
Back
Top