Why we need to remove the children of atheistic parents

M

MarcusA

Verified User
If the social evil of letting atheists have and raise children is allowed, they'll be raised in deviance, perversion, and inferiority.

Likely learning that pedophilia or sex with animals are just another "lifestyle choice", rather than inherantly revolting, among other vile and atheistic traits, such as distain for intellectualism, virtue, and higher things in favor of the beastly and material things which the sub-human atheist lusts over, whether it be rape, bestiality, child molestation, or other natural traits and habits of the atheistic.

Based on this, I'd argue that the state should mandatorily confiscate the children from all atheistic homes in America and Western Europe, perhaps transferring them to Catholic or other religious boarding schools, where they will be taught and indoctrinated into virtue, intellect, civilization and higher-value things, rather than pedophilia, rape, bestiality, sodomy pornography and other nastly little vices which the atheist naturally favors over virtues, as would be naturally expected of any other feral beast or vermin which lacks any redeeming trait worthy of being called "human" to begin with.

Perhaps even a 0-child policy which specifically profiles atheists and other moral, intellectual, and aesthetic degenerates, even if this involves mandatory or forced abortion, it would arguably be the lesser evil than allowing the atheist to breed, would it not?

(If I had the power to, I'd personally eliminate every atheist on the planet, sadly I don't, so all I can do is do everything humanly possible to marginalize them and make sure they're socially regarded in the same category as serial killers, pedophiles, and rapists, given that such things are merely the very practice of atheism to begin with, and any atheist who doesn't rape, murder, torture children and such isn't being a very good atheist at all, now is he?)
 
MarcusA said:
If the social evil of letting atheists have and raise children is allowed, they'll be raised in deviance, perversion, and inferiority.

Likely learning that pedophilia or sex with animals are just another "lifestyle choice", rather than inherantly revolting, among other vile and atheistic traits, such as distain for intellectualism, virtue, and higher things in favor of the beastly and material things which the sub-human atheist lusts over, whether it be rape, bestiality, child molestation, or other natural traits and habits of the atheistic.

Based on this, I'd argue that the state should mandatorily confiscate the children from all atheistic homes in America and Western Europe, perhaps transferring them to Catholic or other religious boarding schools, where they will be taught and indoctrinated into virtue, intellect, civilization and higher-value things, rather than pedophilia, rape, bestiality, sodomy pornography and other nastly little vices which the atheist naturally favors over virtues, as would be naturally expected of any other feral beast or vermin which lacks any redeeming trait worthy of being called "human" to begin with.

Perhaps even a 0-child policy which specifically profiles atheists and other moral, intellectual, and aesthetic degenerates, even if this involves mandatory or forced abortion, it would arguably be the lesser evil than allowing the atheist to breed, would it not?

(If I had the power to, I'd personally eliminate every atheist on the planet, sadly I don't, so all I can do is do everything humanly possible to marginalize them and make sure they're socially regarded in the same category as serial killers, pedophiles, and rapists, given that such things are merely the very practice of atheism to begin with, and any atheist who doesn't rape, murder, torture children and such isn't being a very good atheist at all, now is he?)
Click to expand...

what religion are you?

real god forgives and only wants those who choose him freely.

only satan cajoles.
 
MarcusA said:
Not at all, children should either be properly educated into the national religion or mandatorily aborted, there is no middle ground.
Click to expand...

The Constitution specifically prohibits a national religion and most of the other things you propose. It would fit well in Nazi Germany.
 
MarcusA said:
If the social evil of letting atheists have and raise children is allowed, they'll be raised in deviance, perversion, and inferiority.

Likely learning that pedophilia or sex with animals are just another "lifestyle choice", rather than inherantly revolting, among other vile and atheistic traits, such as distain for intellectualism, virtue, and higher things in favor of the beastly and material things which the sub-human atheist lusts over, whether it be rape, bestiality, child molestation, or other natural traits and habits of the atheistic.

Based on this, I'd argue that the state should mandatorily confiscate the children from all atheistic homes in America and Western Europe, perhaps transferring them to Catholic or other religious boarding schools, where they will be taught and indoctrinated into virtue, intellect, civilization and higher-value things, rather than pedophilia, rape, bestiality, sodomy pornography and other nastly little vices which the atheist naturally favors over virtues, as would be naturally expected of any other feral beast or vermin which lacks any redeeming trait worthy of being called "human" to begin with.

Perhaps even a 0-child policy which specifically profiles atheists and other moral, intellectual, and aesthetic degenerates, even if this involves mandatory or forced abortion, it would arguably be the lesser evil than allowing the atheist to breed, would it not?

(If I had the power to, I'd personally eliminate every atheist on the planet, sadly I don't, so all I can do is do everything humanly possible to marginalize them and make sure they're socially regarded in the same category as serial killers, pedophiles, and rapists, given that such things are merely the very practice of atheism to begin with, and any atheist who doesn't rape, murder, torture children and such isn't being a very good atheist at all, now is he?)
Click to expand...

Your trolling sucks. It really lacks any critical thinking as belief is an unknown. People aren't labeled to a religion or not except to themselves and possibly those close to them. If you are part of a tightly knitted order you will have titles and verifications but that's not public either.
 
Chaz said:
I just want him to name names. Hopefully the national religion isn't Anglican (rebranded as Episcopal since the Revolution), because, that's the definition of a fraud.
Click to expand...

'Puritans'. Do you know why they got the name? Because they wanted to 'purify' the Church of England. (Maybe one day, you can become an American?)


"Puritans
The Puritans were English Protestants in the 16th and 17th centuries, who sought to purify the Church of England of Roman Catholic practices, maintaining that the Church of England had not been fully reformed and should become more Protestant.Wikipedia"
 
Chaz said:
He's straight-up Noahide.
Click to expand...

"The Separatists' faith experience was part of the larger English Reformation of the 16th century. This movement sought to “purify” the Church of England of its corrupt human doctrine and practices; the people in the movement were known as “Puritans.” Separatists were those Puritans who no longer accepted the Church of England as a true church, refused to work within the structure to affect changes, and “separated” themselves to form a true church based solely on Biblical precedent. Puritans rejected Christmas, Easter and the various Saint's Days because they had no scriptural justification, and in their worship services, they rejected hymns, the recitations of the Lord's Prayer and creeds for the same reason."
https://www.plimoth.org/explore/17th-century-english-village/faith-pilgrims

Chaz. You have embraced Satan. The Whore of Babylon. (your only Salvation is to get a large stick, and beat yourself with it) :(
 
Jack said:
"The Separatists' faith experience was part of the larger English Reformation of the 16th century. This movement sought to “purify” the Church of England of its corrupt human doctrine and practices; the people in the movement were known as “Puritans.” Separatists were those Puritans who no longer accepted the Church of England as a true church, refused to work within the structure to affect changes, and “separated” themselves to form a true church based solely on Biblical precedent. Puritans rejected Christmas, Easter and the various Saint's Days because they had no scriptural justification, and in their worship services, they rejected hymns, the recitations of the Lord's Prayer and creeds for the same reason."
https://www.plimoth.org/explore/17th-century-english-village/faith-pilgrims

Chaz. You have embraced Satan. The Whore of Babylon. (your only Salvation is to get a large stick, and beat yourself with it) :(
Click to expand...

that's not noahide. noahide is for self hating humans under satanic oppression.
 
Jack said:
'Puritans'. Do you know why they got the name? Because they wanted to 'purify' the Church of England. (Maybe one day, you can become an American?)


"Puritans
The Puritans were English Protestants in the 16th and 17th centuries, who sought to purify the Church of England of Roman Catholic practices, maintaining that the Church of England had not been fully reformed and should become more Protestant.Wikipedia"
Click to expand...

I have respect for most protestant churches, to include the Congregationalists. I just don't respect the Anglicans, because, rather than having a theological argument for existing, they had a cheating bastard king who wanted to dump one wife for his mistress, and have the Church sanction it.
 
Jack said:
"The Separatists' faith experience was part of the larger English Reformation of the 16th century. This movement sought to “purify” the Church of England of its corrupt human doctrine and practices; the people in the movement were known as “Puritans.” Separatists were those Puritans who no longer accepted the Church of England as a true church, refused to work within the structure to affect changes, and “separated” themselves to form a true church based solely on Biblical precedent. Puritans rejected Christmas, Easter and the various Saint's Days because they had no scriptural justification, and in their worship services, they rejected hymns, the recitations of the Lord's Prayer and creeds for the same reason."
https://www.plimoth.org/explore/17th-century-english-village/faith-pilgrims

Chaz. You have embraced Satan. The Whore of Babylon. (your only Salvation is to get a large stick, and beat yourself with it) :(
Click to expand...

Puritans were fucked in the head, burning witches and all that weird shit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top