Why we need to remove the children of atheistic parents

Chaz said:
I have respect for most protestant churches, to include the Congregationalists. I just don't respect the Anglicans, because, rather than having a theological argument for existing, they had a cheating bastard king who wanted to dump one wife for his mistress, and have the Church sanction it.
Click to expand...

Chaz. Don't bring Trump into this.
 
Jack said:
So ... (tapping finger on desk) exactly WHY are you voting for Trump?
Click to expand...

Have you missed all of my posts on the topic? I even started a thread about voting for Kanye (although he has failed to qualify for any meaningful ballots, so, I may vote for someone else).
 
Honestly, we should bring back witch trials and eliminate the current crop of degenerate, neopagan, polytheistic religions such as Wicca and the like, which are subversive to the fascist cause.
 
Crocodile said:
You're thinking of the Pilgrims. While they were separatists they were distinguished between Puritans.
Click to expand...

The Pilgrims were Puritans. The entire purpose of the Massachusetts Bay Colony was to found a settlement for the Puritans (a pejorative term that Anglicans used to refer to Congregationalists).
 
Crocodile said:
You're thinking of the Pilgrims. While they were separatists they were distinguished between Puritans.
Click to expand...

"Many of the Pilgrims were members of a Puritan sect known as the Separatists. They believed that membership in the Church of England violated the biblical precepts for true Christians, and they had to break away and form independent congregations that adhered more strictly to divine requirements."
https://www.plimoth.org/explore/17th-century-english-village/faith-pilgrims
 
MarcusA said:
If the social evil of letting atheists have and raise children is allowed, they'll be raised in deviance, perversion, and inferiority.

Likely learning that pedophilia or sex with animals are just another "lifestyle choice", rather than inherantly revolting, among other vile and atheistic traits, such as distain for intellectualism, virtue, and higher things in favor of the beastly and material things which the sub-human atheist lusts over, whether it be rape, bestiality, child molestation, or other natural traits and habits of the atheistic.

Based on this, I'd argue that the state should mandatorily confiscate the children from all atheistic homes in America and Western Europe, perhaps transferring them to Catholic or other religious boarding schools, where they will be taught and indoctrinated into virtue, intellect, civilization and higher-value things, rather than pedophilia, rape, bestiality, sodomy pornography and other nastly little vices which the atheist naturally favors over virtues, as would be naturally expected of any other feral beast or vermin which lacks any redeeming trait worthy of being called "human" to begin with.

Perhaps even a 0-child policy which specifically profiles atheists and other moral, intellectual, and aesthetic degenerates, even if this involves mandatory or forced abortion, it would arguably be the lesser evil than allowing the atheist to breed, would it not?

(If I had the power to, I'd personally eliminate every atheist on the planet, sadly I don't, so all I can do is do everything humanly possible to marginalize them and make sure they're socially regarded in the same category as serial killers, pedophiles, and rapists, given that such things are merely the very practice of atheism to begin with, and any atheist who doesn't rape, murder, torture children and such isn't being a very good atheist at all, now is he?)
Click to expand...

You just went full Grendel. Never go full Grendel.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top