Why we need to remove the children of atheistic parents

Chaz said:
Puritan is just a pejorative for separatist. It was not a term they embraced.
Click to expand...

No, the Pilgrims were the ones that separated, Puritans actually sought to change the Church of England and there was no separation. The Salem Witch Trials coincided with similar stuff in Europe.
 
Crocodile said:
No, the Pilgrims were the ones that separated, Puritans actually sought to change the Church of England and there was no separation. The Salem Witch Trials coincided with similar stuff in Europe.
Click to expand...

There were moderate and radical Puritans. The former are known as Congregationalists. Pilgrims are simply the people who founded the colony. Congregationalists were the prevalent church in New England for a long time, including after the founding of the country, when MA and CT still had it established as the official church.
 
MarcusA said:
If the social evil of letting atheists have and raise children is allowed, they'll be raised in deviance, perversion, and inferiority.

Likely learning that pedophilia or sex with animals are just another "lifestyle choice", rather than inherantly revolting, among other vile and atheistic traits, such as distain for intellectualism, virtue, and higher things in favor of the beastly and material things which the sub-human atheist lusts over, whether it be rape, bestiality, child molestation, or other natural traits and habits of the atheistic.

Based on this, I'd argue that the state should mandatorily confiscate the children from all atheistic homes in America and Western Europe, perhaps transferring them to Catholic or other religious boarding schools, where they will be taught and indoctrinated into virtue, intellect, civilization and higher-value things, rather than pedophilia, rape, bestiality, sodomy pornography and other nastly little vices which the atheist naturally favors over virtues, as would be naturally expected of any other feral beast or vermin which lacks any redeeming trait worthy of being called "human" to begin with.

Perhaps even a 0-child policy which specifically profiles atheists and other moral, intellectual, and aesthetic degenerates, even if this involves mandatory or forced abortion, it would arguably be the lesser evil than allowing the atheist to breed, would it not?

(If I had the power to, I'd personally eliminate every atheist on the planet, sadly I don't, so all I can do is do everything humanly possible to marginalize them and make sure they're socially regarded in the same category as serial killers, pedophiles, and rapists, given that such things are merely the very practice of atheism to begin with, and any atheist who doesn't rape, murder, torture children and such isn't being a very good atheist at all, now is he?)
Click to expand...

I think all ginger kids in Mississippi should have their heads cut off.
 
Atheists do not start wars and conflicts over their lack of beliefs. We have had so many wars, bombings, fights and arguments over religions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top