Wikipedia founder says it is now extremely biased towards the left.

Trolls and palefaces singing from the Loser's hymnbook.

Haw, haw..........................haw.
 
Dumbass paleface doesn't know the difference between ' reversed' and ' inverted ' .
Go home. America doesn't need you.

Haw, haw...........................haw.
 
Cohort said:
sorry but you are wrong. they are liberal companies with a liberal ethos and they push a point of view.
Click to expand...

Some argument, no wonder you like Trump. Think what you want but you don't have a two-sided perspective like me. I think you'd be surprised how conservative I'd be considered on many things.
 
Crocodile said:
Some argument, no wonder you like Trump. Think what you want but you don't have a two-sided perspective like me. I think you'd be surprised how conservative I'd be considered on many things.
Click to expand...

it's run by a liberal and anyone that has used it knows it has a liberal bias. you are so far into the tank you can't see it. those with culture privilege are usually blind to it.
 
FreeSpeech said:
No they can't the leftist administrators take all politically charged topics, put their spin in, and lock them. You can't even say that Vox is a leftwing publication, compare the summary sections of Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC, they literally use the far left activist group Media Matters as a "reliable source" and their "reliable sources," are all liberal outlets and you need half a dozen of those liberal "reliable sources" as citations to label a liberal source a liberal source. The article on the Mueller Investigation is pulled verbatim from Vox, if it still even mentions the fact that the report found no evidence for conspiring with the Russians it tries to claim that conspiracy and collusion are not the same even though the Mueller report itself says they are legally synonymous and of course it's locked. I couldn't even put in unequivocal statistical facts for the city of South Bend on the entry for Mayor Pete. All criticisms or controversies unfavorable to the right are always in the article summary right at the top, for criticisms and controversies unfavorable to the left, if they are allowed in at all, are all ways buried at the very bottom of the article.

I was an editor of wikipedia all through college a decade ago when they used to be neutral so I've seen it change in real time so dont give me any of your gaslighting bullshit.
Click to expand...

So give me examples, "editor".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top