Truck Fump / h1b
Verified User
Read Mussolini, facism involves unifying a bunch of sticks into a faggot.Fascism is a form of socialism. It is Marxism. Go try reading the writings of Karl Marx.
Two of the fag sticks are business and government
Read Mussolini, facism involves unifying a bunch of sticks into a faggot.Fascism is a form of socialism. It is Marxism. Go try reading the writings of Karl Marx.
There is no such thing. Capitalism has nothing to do with any government.Statist capitalism
WRONG. Marxism is more than communism. It is also fascism, which is government manipulation of markets. Marx described fascism as a stepping stone to communism.isn't "Marxism" which calls for the state to control the means of production outright.
Capitalism is not communism. Redefinition fallacy.Statist capitalism is a form of socialism, and in a sense, indirect communism.
That is fascism...a form of socialism...and Marxism.That is, the state controls what gets produced and who produces it, but the means of production are left in private hands rather than controlled directly by the state.
Fascism has nothing to do with wood. Mussolini never said it did.Read Mussolini, facism involves unifying a bunch of sticks into a faggot.
Businesses are not fascism.Two of the fag sticks are business and government
You don't get to make up your own definitions. Statist capitalism is a form of socialism where the means of production are privately held but the state controls what you produce, in simplest terms. Much of China's economy is run this way today for example, and yes, the best early examples derive from fascist government in Europe.There is no such thing. Capitalism has nothing to do with any government.
WRONG. Marxism is more than communism. It is also fascism, which is government manipulation of markets. Marx described fascism as a stepping stone to communism.
Capitalism is not communism. Redefinition fallacy.
That is fascism...a form of socialism...and Marxism.
Let's be serious here. I'll begin with "You are a moron who has no clue on this subject.""Marxist administration"? LOL Can we at least try to be serious here?
I'm not.You don't get to make up your own definitions.
No such thing.Statist capitalism
Capitalism is not socialism.is a form of socialism
That is fascism. Capitalism is not fascism or any form of socialism.where the means of production are privately held but the state controls what you produce, in simplest terms.
Capitalism, fascism, and communism are found in every nation on Earth. Many of them have slavery as well (including the United States).Much of China's economy is run this way today for example, and yes, the best early examples derive from fascist government in Europe.
You cannot redefine words using Holy Links. False authority fallacy.State Capitalism: The Illusion of Socialist Progress
Discover how state capitalism, a mix of free markets and state controls, is crippling economies. Learn why a truly free market is the solution.www.capitalism.org
nobody says that, doofy.Fascism has nothing to do with wood. Mussolini never said it did.
Businesses are not fascism.
Denying your own post won't work.nobody says that, doofy.
Business is not fascism. Redefinition fallacy.business and government colluding together is fascism.
you're an idiot.Denying your own post won't work.
Business is not fascism. Redefinition fallacy.
Insult fallacy (Mantra 1a). You can't win an argument with insults.you're an idiot.
Stating the obvious always re-centers the discussion.Insult fallacy (Mantra 1a). You can't win an argument with insults.
The administration of wikipedia is neither.he calls all fascism Marxism.
An insult is not an argument or a discussion. Redefinition fallacy.Stating the obvious always re-centers the discussion.
Are you trying to tell me that it's not ridiculous to claim that Wikipedia is Marxist?Argument of the Stone fallacy.
Fixation. Cherry picking fallacy. False authority fallacy. Redefinition fallacy. Repetition fallacy (chanting).contract /kŏn′trăkt″/
noun
2. The writing or document containing such an agreement.
- An agreement between two or more parties, especially one that is written and enforceable by law.
Dude, silly assertions like the OP get the "Nuh-uh" response they deserve.Let's be serious here. I'll begin with "You are a moron who has no clue on this subject."
I made a thread on this topic. You can start by refuting that entire thing. Until then, you are dismissed.
Too many examples have already been given. Argument of the Stone fallacy.The administration of wikipedia is neither.
Argument of the Stone fallacy. Buzzword fallacy. You don't get to declare 'reality' for everyone. Omniscience fallacy.Dude, silly assertions like the OP get the "Nuh-uh" response they deserve.
You want to discuss something start from reality and work from there.
Reality is objective. The OP's argument is purely subjective and counter to reality.Argument of the Stone fallacy. Buzzword fallacy. You don't get to declare 'reality' for everyone. Omniscience fallacy.