Will the death of R v W kill the Republicans chances?

[redfish]

well said

 

[Truth Detector]

In a very sharp and clear way, this could be a good thing for democrat voters and here's why....the SC wants states to decide on a woman's right to choose....the same very states, these lame duck sorry negro's and white trash cans ignore when its time to vote locally...what better way to get these lot of creatures off the couch, out of their trailers than to vote for something that is fundamentally their right? They took away their votes, stripped em of all the social safety nets dem's provided, said the hell with mask and clean water etc etc etc and still got elected to office now this....if they chose once again to look the other way and let the GOP in charge, I say the hell with em all and fuck em.

 

[evince]

an unborn human is not a "cluster of cells" you fricken asshole.

Yes it is


Science

 

[Truth Detector]

Women will retain their personal rights in civilized states like Massachusetts, New York, and California.
If they choose to live in Handmaiden states, don't get knocked up if you can't afford a trip for a Blue state abortion.
You can't afford kids in that circumstance anyway.

Do you understand that MOST of the anti-abortion crowd are women? You're such a fucking moron.

I truly loathe the misogyny and theocracy of Red State America, but the women in my life were thankfully never subjected to it.

I loathe America hating leftist morons like you who bombard political forums with your abject stupidity and lunacy. Move to Venezuela already you pathetic, worthless piece of human excrement.

 

[Truth Detector]

If your god is so fucking in charge of everything, why did he allow RvW in the first place?

 

[evince]

The vast majority of Americans want abortion safe and legal



The republicans packed the court illegally


Catch the car you dogs

 

[Nordberg]

2/3rds of Americans want abortion rights to stay. That cannot be helpful to the reds in the midterms.

 

[Jarod]

if you don't want a kid, don't screw, its really quite simple.

Its all about punishing women for being easy for some trumppers.

 

[Truth Detector]

You do not believe that Americans have the Constitutional right to privacy from the government when making medical decisions?

The right to privacy argument is weak and laughable.

Why the Right to Privacy Argument for Abortion Fails

A common argument used by abortion advocates is: “A woman can do what she wants with her body! Since it is her body that is going through the pregnancy, then she should have the right to terminate the pregnancy.” However, this “argument” fails for a number of reasons.

First, it is not an argument. It is an assertion. An argument is a series of at least two propositions that logically lead to a conclusion. That doesn’t happen here.

Second, there are a myriad of things that a person can’t do in the name of privacy or by appealing to “this is my body.” A person cannot do drugs (excluding marijuana in some places) and simply get away with it, even though it is his body that is affected by the drugs. A person, in most places, cannot prostitute herself, even though it is her body. (Some have actually argued that prostitution should be legal because it empowers women and it is their body.) Examples could be multiplied, but hopefully the point is clear.

Third, and most importantly, it isn’t her body!!! When deciding to murder a baby in the womb, arguing “It’s my body, so I can do it” is simply asinine (that means incredibly stupid)! If a woman was going to abort herself, that would be suicide. Abortion takes the life of the baby, not the mother. The baby is a separate being with its own DNA, blood type, and gender. The baby is not identical with the mother. So, even if she could do what she wanted with her body, the baby is a different story.

https://ses.edu/why-the-right-to-privacy-argument-for-abortion-fails/

 

[Jarod]

2/3rds of Americans want abortion rights to stay. That cannot be helpful to the reds in the midterms.

That's why I think Kavanaugh will not ban it outright.

 

[Truth Detector]

If our constitutional right to make our own medical decisions is taken from us, many Americans will be upset.

No one is taking your medical decisions from you. Another false and laughably stupid argument.

 

[Truth Detector]

Mini poor women do not have the opportunity to leave the state they were born in, or to travel for an abortion. The Republicans don’t care because they know their daughters will have the financial ability. This rule is to keep poor people poor, that’s all.

There's a lot of simple solutions to prevent the need for non-medical emergency abortions. Use birth control or abstain from sexual promiscuity.

I know, that's rocket science for low IQ leftists to comprehend. That's why the Democratic Party of Lying Jackasses needs willful idiots in their party.

 

[anonymoose]

If the supreme court overturns row versus Wade

They’re not. Not even on the horizon.
Don’t you have a slip and fall case to attend to or is business that slow?

 

[Truth Detector]

Isn’t that what the Republicans need to keep their power? Keep the poor repressed and uneducated.

Projection
Projection is the process of displacing one’s feelings onto a different person, animal, or object. The term is most commonly used to describe defensive projection—attributing one’s own unacceptable urges to another. For example, if someone continuously bullies and ridicules a peer about his insecurities, the bully might be projecting his own struggle with self-esteem onto the other person.

 

[Truth Detector]

So if your daughter was faced with a situation where she would likely die without an abortion, Your position would remain the same?

There are medical exceptions dumbass. I am still wondering how someone who claims to be a lawyer can make such stupid, lame arguments and lie all the time.

 

[Truth Detector]

Wolverine is the poster boy for opposition to abortion. It's about scoring points with Jesus. He does not care AT ALL about that life once it's born. I guess Jesus doesn't cotton to single moms. The hypocrisy of this position is beyond the pale, especially among anti-vaxxers. They feel they have a right to kill however many people they want because it's THEIR BODY!!!! Unless they are a pregnant woman. Then white men decide.

This law will clearly be allowed to stand. The only question is whether that decision redefines Roe or eliminates it. I suspect the latter. It will be another nail in the GOP coffin. If I was Kavanaugh or Barrett or Gorsuch I would be embarrassed. The right views you as a partisan tool not a Supreme Court Justice. You got the job on the condition you voted their way. It's a sad day.

 

[Truth Detector]

Of course what Earl doesn't get is that once Roe is gone, the states will decide. Because Earl is an idiot.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

So do you think the S.Ct will allow the states to set any limit they want... like for example "at conception" or even pre-conception meaning they could legally ban birth control...?

increments, Jarot......increments......

 

[PostmodernProphet]

And it effectively removes a woman's right to an abortion, if heartbeat is the measure. The heartbeat begins as early as 3 weeks, but can't be detected until six or seven weeks. By the time you can determine whether there is a heartbeat, the door is closed. If that's the measure, Roe v Wade is dead.

sounds great....

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Very unlikely. Coat-hangers are very available.

maybe we should ban them like assault weapons.......if they can be used by kids to kill, shouldn't they be illegal?.......