Right, I get that. And I also get there are two separate issues here. Does a woman have the right to an abortion, and at what point is that right NOT absolute. If the right is never absolute, then effectively the answer to the second is 'no' and Roe v Wade is gone.
Will the death of R v W kill the Republicans chances?
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Right, I get that. And I also get there are two separate issues here. Does a woman have the right to an abortion, and at what point is that right NOT absolute. If the right is never absolute, then effectively the answer to the second is 'no' and Roe v Wade is gone.
To me it just makes sense to use the same measure for when life starts as to when it ends.
Its a good argument.
To me it just makes sense to use the same measure for when life starts as to when it ends.
When does it end?
yup, I agree, except it is the right to privacy from government involvement in her medical decisions.
And it effectively removes a woman's right to an abortion, if heartbeat is the measure. The heartbeat begins as early as 3 weeks, but can't be detected until six or seven weeks. By the time you can determine whether there is a heartbeat, the door is closed. If that's the measure, Roe v Wade is dead.
But if the limit removes that right, then there IS NO RIGHT.
evince
Truthmatters
What would a Court decide about one human being used as a blood supply hooked up to another human
Should the blood supplier have the right to not be hooked up to the other human ?
Not heartbeat, he said brain activity to the point of brain stem activity. Heartbeat is very subjective, some call a muscle reflex a heartbeat but its not. Its not receiving a message from the brain to beat until much later.
There is still a right, its just totally outweighed by the embryo.
evince
Truthmatters
So how long would a blood supply person in my example be unable to end the situation?
Only nine months after it began?
Only when the supplied person gets well or dies?
At any piont the supplier decides?
IF, but the right would still exist in other circumstances.
NO, what it will do is save milions of lives (mostly black and hispanic)
Very unlikely. Coat-hangers are very available.
an unborn human is not a "cluster of cells" you fricken asshole.
Wrong and you seldom exhibit anything that could be mistaken for "thinking." The court is not overturning anything. They are correcting a bad decision and remanding it back to the States where the issue always belonged.
I do wish you weren't a dishonest, partisan hack. Really I do. November is going to be harsh on low IQ leftists who hate this country and race hustle.
if you don't want a kid, don't screw, its really quite simple.
That's pretty much the argument from the left and the Democratic Party of Lying Jackasses.
