You obviously don't know English. Go learn English.I know English. That's why I'm asking the question. The word "well" has a meaning and I don't see how anyone can say both the federal and state militaries are "well" regulated.
You obviously don't know English. Go learn English.I know English. That's why I'm asking the question. The word "well" has a meaning and I don't see how anyone can say both the federal and state militaries are "well" regulated.
Assumption of victory fallacy.I can't help that you can't defend your position.
there has been meaningful all of those.It's a simple question. What do you put more stock in - the fact that there has been no meaningful fraud, zero counterfeit ballots and no meaningful ballot harvesting OR do you put more stock in what people think they saw? "People" meaning nutter butters like Meslissa Carone and drug addicted, mentally unstable, woods-sleeping felon truck drivers who believe they drove a trailer full of ballots in circles.
The problem for you is that you'd have to admit to being a tin foil hat wearer to downplay the facts about the election. Why? Because the only way to downplay the facts about fraud, ballots, harvesting, etc is to claim "they're all in on it" and then you out yourself as a crazy person... a ghost chaser..... one of the "the DNC did it" people I was mocking in my post to Postmodern Prophet.
Correct. When the other person concedes, the opponent wins.Assumption of victory fallacy.
Tell me about the meaningful fraud that has been found. I don't mean ghost stories. I mean actual instances of voter fraud.there has been meaningful all of those.
quit shilling for the establishment liars.
I'm asking the question because I know English. I know what the word "well" means in this context and that's why I don't understand your claim.You obviously don't know English. Go learn English.
No one conceded, Void. Assumption of victory fallacy.Correct. When the other person concedes, the opponent wins.
DON'T TRY TO DENY DEMOCRAT ELECTION FRAUD!Tell me about the meaningful fraud that has been found. I don't mean ghost stories. I mean actual instances of voter fraud.
You obviously don't know English. Go learn English.I'm asking the question because I know English. I know what the word "well" means in this context and that's why I don't understand your claim.
Careful, that way lies another election fault.All of Wisconsin's votes can be nulled if it's found to be not secure.
Not an ideal situation, but if Democrats cheat it that much and disenfranchise their voters, it's fucked anyways.
Well if that's what they want, that's what they'll get. And they will lose. Quickly and decisively.Careful, that way lies another election fault.
...and civil war.
That they will, but I don't want war.Well if that's what they want, that's what they'll get. And they will lose. Quickly and decisively.
I don't either, but sometimes you gotta do what you gotta do. That's a last resort for sure.That they will, but I don't want war.
Then tell me about it. Tell me about all the fraudulent ballots.DON'T TRY TO DENY DEMOCRAT ELECTION FRAUD!
Do you seriously think Biden got 81 million votes?Then tell me about it. Tell me about all the fraudulent ballots.

Yes I do and will until there's enough reason to believe otherwise.Do you seriously think Biden got 81 million votes?
![]()
When you decided to not defend your position, that is conceding.No one conceded, Void. Assumption of victory fallacy.
RQAA. DON'T TRY TO DENY DEMOCRAT ELECTION FRAUD.Then tell me about it. Tell me about all the fraudulent ballots.
DON'T TRY TO DENY DEMOCRAT ELECTION FRAUD.Yes I do and will until there's enough reason to believe otherwise.