Woman suing Wal Mart for racism

That's the way it is, not the way I'd like it to be.

Only a judge has the power to decide which cases are frivolous or "true", BTW, and they have to be presented with a Motion for dismissal or Summary Judgment and hear arguments before they can rule. Either way, Defendant must answer the original complaint.

I have an idea: why don't you talk to your attorney and let him or her fill you in (and bill you for it)?

Yet you argue in favor of a frivolous lawsuit.
 
Do you actually have the belief that when you call a corporate office that you're really going to get to talk to those in charge??

I have the belief that if you called a corporate office you'd have gotten a name if you wanted your tale to be credible. :D

Do you have one or not?

BTW, I'll check.
 
I have the belief that if you called a corporate office you'd have gotten a name if you wanted your tale to be credible. :D

Do you have one or not?

BTW, I'll check.

I don't bother to put the names of minions to memory; but I'm glad to see that you do. :good4u:
 
Back
Top