Minister of Truth
Practically Perfect
It's not exactly a ten-part joke.
Would You Dismantle the Underground Railroad?
- Thread starter artichoke
- Start date
It's not exactly a ten-part joke.
Truck Fump / h1b
Verified User
this thread is 'hegelian dialectic" propaganda.
This post ignores everything being asked here to mindlessly state irrelevant platitudes.
Go lay down and let the adults finish their conversation.
maximizing conflict and increasing totalitarian = freedom sooner?
no sir. that's underground railroad was good.
that's like saying you wouldn't kill hitler because without hitler maybe they wouldn't have been able to do the atomic bomb as soon.
note to yourself, always kill hitler.
Truck Fump / h1b
Verified User
This post ignores everything being asked here to mindlessly state irrelevant platitudes.
Go lay down and let the adults finish their conversation.
nopem you're a loon. maximizing horror to achieve ends is straight up masonic hegelian dialectic destructiveness.
Hmmm. Allowing justice to prevail by corking the pressure cooker, which might result in the wholesale slaughter of millions of DEMOCRATS, or do the right thing and help their slaves escape to freedom.
How many escaped slaves wanted to "return to cause trouble", exactly?
I mean it did work once, in Haiti, and other places made one hell of a statement that got the world's attention, usually by storming some kind of weapons cache, immediately using those weapons to slaughter their masters, and then moving on from there. Different revolts ended at different parts of this process. If you want to go back to Spartacus and such, the results vary even further. And the world ALREADY saw slavery as an abomination (nothing gained from 'telling the world how bad' it was), hence the fact that it was already being phased out at every turn around the world, importation had already been banned, etc. And the slaves weren't the ones who returned to cause trouble. The overwhelming majority of the 100% preventable and unnecessary bloodshed was among white people.
It doesn't HAVE to be a ten-part joke to be a non-sequiter fallacy that makes no sense.
You can be stupid and wrong in small sentences.
Can shouting for silence make a room quieter?
Not some dirty trick or propaganda, just common sense.
650,000 preventable dead Americans and making us the only country that had to go to war to abolish slavery = "good."
Got it.
There is an argument for that, too. He killed a lot of communists, who were by far, the greater evil. In body count alone, their genocides were far worse than anything Hitler even aspired to.
*
Hmmm. Allowing justice to prevail by corking the pressure cooker, which might result in the wholesale slaughter of millions of DEMOCRATS, or do the right thing and help their slaves escape to freedom.
Just not sure it WOULD BE the right thing...if it forces the most devastating and costly (casualty-wise) war in this country's entire history, unnecessarily, to help them escape. The only question for me is how quickly would the able-bodied slaves have been able to make slavery too unfeasible to continue. That's really the calculation. If it would take too long, then scrap the whole idea...but if it would mean slavery would've ended in the same kind of time frame as the Civil War or sooner...without the Civil War...that's a no-brainer.
Yep, I addressed this random nonsense in my first reply to him. Hadn't seen you already bring it up.
Truck Fump / h1b
Verified User
*Maximizing horror to achieve endsMaximizing temporary injustice to minimize overall injustice. <=== There, your straw man distortion of what is being argued has been fixed.
it's an idiot notion, either way. it makes you a bad person. and now I know you're a spook. you completely broke cover with this dumbassery.
butI guess that's the point, to eventually break cover and be a moron.
Truck Fump / h1b
Verified User
Can shouting for silence make a room quieter?
Not some dirty trick or propaganda, just common sense.
650,000 preventable dead Americans and making us the only country that had to go to war to abolish slavery = "good."
Got it.
There is an argument for that, too. He killed a lot of communists, who were by far, the greater evil. In body count alone, their genocides were far worse than anything Hitler even aspired to.
yep. you're a moron all right.
Yes, only a bad person and idiot would ever suggest saving lives or freeing the slaves more quickly.
And now we know you're a conspiracy theorist nutjob.
Are the "spooks" in the room with us right now? Or is it Russians?
When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.
Truck Fump / h1b
Verified User
Yes, only a bad person and idiot would ever suggest saving lives or freeing the slaves more quickly.
And now we know you're a conspiracy theorist nutjob.
Are the "spooks" in the room with us right now? Or is it Russians?
View attachment 20327
When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.
no. only a bad person would shut down the underground railroad for the "greater good".
why did you blow your cover now, operative?
So I suppose every time anyone has sacrificed anything or any amount of people to save vastly more people, they are evil too? Because that adds an awful lot of people to the evil category that you might not be expecting.
