Matt Dillon
Semolina comes from wheat
Climate change has always been, redistrubuting wealth in the name of it is something of the UN.
Total bullshit. The weather changes, so wealth redistribution. Bullshit!
WTF is a "climate team"?
- Thread starter dukkha
- Start date
Climate change has always been, redistrubuting wealth in the name of it is something of the UN.
Total bullshit. The weather changes, so wealth redistribution. Bullshit!
climate is always changing. trying to be carbon neutral (WTF is that about burning wood pellets instead of nat gas?)
is a losing proposition in a world with increasing energy needs.
The focus should be on protecting the worlds carbon sinks (Amazon / oceans etc) from degraded to the point
they cant function to recycle free carbon molecules
but there no money or power in conservation
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
"Climate is always changing."
No shit, Shitlock?
No shit, Shitlock?
Matt Dillon
Semolina comes from wheat
cancel2 2022
Canceled
.
Total bullshit, they've even brought back that fucking disaster Gina McCarthy.
Biden’s Climate Plan Would Punish Household Budgets, Lacks Voter Support
Joe Biden pledges to spend $2 trillion on his climate plan during his first term. Divided among America’s 120 million households, that puts the average American household on the hook for $17,000 – or more than $4,000 per household per year – in additional spending burdens.
Biden’s nominee for Treasury Secretary, Janet Yellin, proposes to add a carbon dioxide tax – on top of Biden’s $2 trillion in direct government spending – that would start at $40 per ton, and increase by a hefty 5 percent each year. The left-of-center Brookings Institution calculates that such a plan would add an initial 36 cents to the price of gasoline. It would also add an additional 20-percent hike to consumer electricity bills.
Yellin’s carbon dioxide tax would not only saddle consumers with large direct increases in gasoline and electricity prices, it would also punish consumers by raising costs for goods and services throughout the economy, with those higher costs showing up in higher consumer prices. As the Brookings Institution notes, “Higher energy prices would raise costs for industry and households, resulting in lower profits, wages, and consumption.” That also translates to higher unemployment and lower living standards.
It clear that Biden has no voter mandate to impose such draconian and expensive policies on the American people. On November 1 – just two days before the 2020 election – the New York Times published a poll showing only 37 percent of Americans are “very concerned” about climate change. That is less than the 39 percent of Americans who are either “not at all” concerned or “not too” concerned about climate change. The remaining 21 percent are merely “somewhat” concerned.
Those Americans who are “somewhat concerned” about climate change do not support spending more than a few dollars per month, at the most, on climate change programs. A 2019 Associated Press poll found less than half of Americans would pay even $10 per month to address climate change. Barely more than half of Americans (57 percent) would be willing to pay as little as a single dollar per month.
Ultimately, Joe Biden’s proposed climate plan is tremendously expensive, economically disastrous, and lacking the support of the American people. There are many reasons why Biden accumulated the number of votes he did in the November election, but aggressive climate activism is not one of them.
https://climaterealism.com/2020/12/...punish-household-budgets-lacks-voter-support/
Total bullshit, they've even brought back that fucking disaster Gina McCarthy.
Biden’s Climate Plan Would Punish Household Budgets, Lacks Voter Support
Joe Biden pledges to spend $2 trillion on his climate plan during his first term. Divided among America’s 120 million households, that puts the average American household on the hook for $17,000 – or more than $4,000 per household per year – in additional spending burdens.
Biden’s nominee for Treasury Secretary, Janet Yellin, proposes to add a carbon dioxide tax – on top of Biden’s $2 trillion in direct government spending – that would start at $40 per ton, and increase by a hefty 5 percent each year. The left-of-center Brookings Institution calculates that such a plan would add an initial 36 cents to the price of gasoline. It would also add an additional 20-percent hike to consumer electricity bills.
Yellin’s carbon dioxide tax would not only saddle consumers with large direct increases in gasoline and electricity prices, it would also punish consumers by raising costs for goods and services throughout the economy, with those higher costs showing up in higher consumer prices. As the Brookings Institution notes, “Higher energy prices would raise costs for industry and households, resulting in lower profits, wages, and consumption.” That also translates to higher unemployment and lower living standards.
It clear that Biden has no voter mandate to impose such draconian and expensive policies on the American people. On November 1 – just two days before the 2020 election – the New York Times published a poll showing only 37 percent of Americans are “very concerned” about climate change. That is less than the 39 percent of Americans who are either “not at all” concerned or “not too” concerned about climate change. The remaining 21 percent are merely “somewhat” concerned.
Those Americans who are “somewhat concerned” about climate change do not support spending more than a few dollars per month, at the most, on climate change programs. A 2019 Associated Press poll found less than half of Americans would pay even $10 per month to address climate change. Barely more than half of Americans (57 percent) would be willing to pay as little as a single dollar per month.
Ultimately, Joe Biden’s proposed climate plan is tremendously expensive, economically disastrous, and lacking the support of the American people. There are many reasons why Biden accumulated the number of votes he did in the November election, but aggressive climate activism is not one of them.
https://climaterealism.com/2020/12/...punish-household-budgets-lacks-voter-support/
cancel2 2022
Canceled
PC bullshit you mean, but you've never ever demonstrated any grasp on scientific or engineering issues. This is very reminiscent of the Soviet Union five year plans which almost invariably failed.
The answer is to go flat out for natural gas, 4th gen. nuclear, hydrogen and ammonia. But the dozy fuckers that have been voted in are bedazzled by wind and solar. Making the US even more beholden to the Chinese not less. They have all the rare earths, most of the cobalt, nickel and much of the lithium. People like you are horizontal thinkers, lateral thinking is totally alien to idiots like you!
no worries
Verified User
Same thing as a football team, without the ball.
was wondering if you saw that. right back to WOTUS and the confiscatory/overbearing regulatory on intrastate waters
yep a bunch of "team" standing around with their heads up their asses
Into the Night
Verified User
It is the Church of Global Warming being confirmed as a state religion, in violation of the 1st amendment.
Into the Night
Verified User
YAVC
Into the Night
Verified User
Define 'climate change'. This is a meaningless buzzword phrase.
Define 'global warming'. This is a meaningless buzzword phrase.
It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth, nor the global atmospheric CO2 content. We don't have anywhere near enough instrumentation to even begin a sensible statistical analysis of this type. The margin of error is too high, and there is no unbiased data.
Into the Night
Verified User
Electric cars are essentially coal fired cars. You gotta charge 'em from somewhere, like a nearby coal fired power plant, and recharging the car takes hours, while refueling a gasoline car takes only a few minutes.
There is no such thing as 'climate science'. Science has no theories about what cannot be defined.
Biden has to win first.
Into the Night
Verified User
Into the Night
Verified User
Define 'climate change'.
Into the Night
Verified User
Define 'climate change'.
It's simpler than that. Manipulation of markets by government is fascism. That includes the energy markets.
Why do you hate carbon dioxide? It's not capable of warming the Earth.
There actually is. Capitalism is the creation of wealth. Where it flourishes, there are cleaner, more efficient, and cheaper ways of doing things.