You Just Lived Through Earth's Hottest Year on Record. Again

The no. of data points is finite and random . For practical purposes there’s an infinite number of temperatures .
I’ll concede the avg. of fixed data points has shown an increase of their average but there is no “climate change” unless you reclassify climate classifications which no one has done
“Climate change” is a misnomers buzzword scare tactic used by the left to implement authoritarian control.
Actually climate change in various regions of the world takes thousands of years. Not 50.
Scare tactic? See you're into conspiracy theories. The far right is onto scare tactics intended to establish the Illuminati's world order.

download (2).jpeg
 
OH NO!!! Quick! Throw money at it!! (Oh, and while you're at it, tell russia, china and india to keep their greenhouse gases within their own borders).
 
Forgive me for daring to ask you to waste a moment of your precious time on my little question. It's crystal clear that your time is worth more than gold. I'm just trembling in my boots over your environmental 'prediction' looming over us like the Sword of Damocles. "the inevitable transition to the Earth no longer supporting life" ???? Others have beat you to it though. For instance, AOC's prophetic words were uttered over five years ago, which means we've got what, like two seconds left:

AOC said, "Millennials, and Gen Z, and all these folks that come after us, are looking up and we’re like 'the world will end in 12 years if we don’t address climate change, and your biggest issue is how are we gonna pay for it?'"

Help me, I'm practically paralyzed here, frozen stiff with terror. Why the hell should we even give a shit anymore? It's all over, folks, OVER.
This stupid prediction has been made for more than a century.
 
They date back to the mid-1800s in most long-settled urban areas.
There is no record of the temperature of the Earth.
Here, they date back to the late 1800s.
There is no record of the temperature of the Earth.
You don't need a thermometer to tell that the climate has changed from even just 50 years ago.
Climate cannot change. Go learn English.
You only have to be able to have observed bird, plant, and animal changes and ranges in that time period,
None.
which spans most of your life and mine too.
None.
 
This stupid prediction has been made for more than a century.
Yes it has, but it really ramped up after the Soviet Union broke up. Many of the power hungry socialist moved into the environmental movement, at least, that's what I remember. In the 70's it was all about an impending ice age, then the Ozone crisis, then of course, global warming, and the most recent adjustment, 'Climate Change'. That one should last them a while. The climate happens to be always changing. lol
 
Because there is an infinite number of temperatures. The sum of an infinite number of data points is always infinity. There is no logical way to argue against that
Statistical math does allow for calculating an average and a tolerance, but he denies statistical math.

Among it's requirements are unbiased raw data (you can't cook it!). Since time is significant and location grouping is significant, the only way to get that is to use uniformly spaced thermometers (they aren't uniformly spaced!) and to read them at the same time by the same authority.

You are quite properly bringing up the requirement that you must declare and justify your variance. A variance of 20 deg/mile is a conservative estimate, since temperature can vary that much across storm fronts, from grass to asphalt, changes with altitude or by moving in or out of a warm or cold current, etc.

NOAA uses the larger number of thermometers. Given the thermometers they use, and given the variance I just declared, that means one thermometer will be measuring an area the size of Virginia (assuming they are uniformly spaced, which they aren't). With this variance, the margin of error is greater than the highest and lowest temperatures ever measured on Earth, so that becomes the fence.

Mathematically speaking, any claim of the temperature of the Earth is just guessing.

It's even worse trying to measure the global atmospheric content of CO2. There are very few stations, all on the surface capable of measuring CO2 at their sensors at all, and CO2 is not uniformly distributed in the atmosphere.

Due to similar problems, you cannot measure the temperature of the Earth, the global atmospheric content of CO2, the pH of the oceans, the total snow and ice on Earth, the range of every animal on Earth, the location of every plant on Earth, the total precipitation on Earth, or the emissivity of Earth.

The Church of Global Warming routinely denies and discards statistical mathematics, probability mathematics, random number mathematics, and even algebra.

Further, they routinely deny and discard the 0th, 1st, and 2nd laws of thermodynamics, and the Stefan-Boltzmann law.

Climate cannot change. It has no values that can 'change'. Climate is a subjective description, and is devoid of any objective values.
 
Back
Top