You Trumppers were sure China would attack Taiwan.

Taiwan will not be physically invaded......Demmycrats will gift it to China whenever they think they can get away with it......

America cannot give away either Taiwan or Ukraine. I know you were hoping your boy trump could get a good price for giving them away, but he will not be able to.

The best America could do is refuse to give them weapons. This would weaken them, but not give them away. And other countries are planning on how to replace the USA if trump is elected.

Meanwhile, Biden is trying to get them the most weapons he can.
 
America cannot give away either Taiwan or Ukraine. I know you were hoping your boy trump could get a good price for giving them away, but he will not be able to.

The best America could do is refuse to give them weapons. This would weaken them, but not give them away. And other countries are planning on how to replace the USA if trump is elected.

Meanwhile, Biden is trying to get them the most weapons he can.

why are you for giving china all the jobs and all that wage money and making americans jobless then?

we don't need a hot war.

we need a spine in this trade war, rich guy walt.
 
walt would rather have a hot war than undo globalization idiocy.

these new world order fascists all feel this way.

they're fucked in the head with reams of dum dum.
 
Hi, Jack. You seem like a very successful and educated man. I do not think you can speak for ALL Chinese people as China's system has benefited you, greatly, while many others remain poor with a very low standard of living. Do you view 1984's authoritarian gov't as the "right approach"?... because it aligns with Confucian harmony?

In American, the Left and Right accuse each other of being authoritarian. Of course, the Left are the true authoritarians. :0)

The Left do NOT like us having the rights granted in the U.S. Constitution's 1st and 2nd amendments. Do you agree with the Left?

Yes, it has been said that the benefit of pirated movies in China, is the introduction to Western culture that they provide.

I believe I can speak for 70% Chinese people, if not 80%. I am not rich, just an ordinary people ,"average joe".
And I want to say something about this "political ideology"

When I browse forums in the United States, I find that people frequently use terms such as "authoritarianism", "democracy", "capitalism", "socialism", "communism", etc.

But in China, we rarely discuss these concepts. Because we are realistic creatures. If you have seen some interviews from John Mearsheimer, you will find that he often mentions this point.

In our views, authoritarian governments are not that “authoritarian”, and democratic elections are not that “democratic”.

Even when we mention communism, it seems like we're talking about the "great working class, good people," but does the working class really have such great morals that people are willing to voluntarily work for the entire society in the absence of capitalist style compensation incentives? Obviously, the working class is not as that noble either.

What we believe is that when you encounter problems, you should try to find a solution to the problem, rather than being trapped by many complex concepts before solving the problem.

For example, when we find that the security situation is not good and there are many cases of theft and robbery, we will think like this: "We need to install some cameras on the street, and if someone commits a crime, we can know who they are." We do not feel that this violates our privacy, nor do we feel that we are being monitored by the government. Because we need cameras to control crime. The practical role of the camera is primary, and we will ignore other parts.

We certainly have reason to ignore the issue of whether the cameras on the streets have violated privacy, or whether this has put us under government surveillance, because you can always find some supporters and some opponents regarding these issues. If you want to argue, then the argument will never end, but life must continue.

The same reason applies to LGBTQ, regarding the legality of same-sex marriage. If you want to argue, you can always find supporters and opponents. So the government decides that "we don't discuss it.Keep it quiet".

Regarding the issue of "guns problem" in the United States, we know it involves the 2nd Amendment . If this issue occurred in China, we would think, "Do we have a problem with too many guns? Yes, so we have decided to prohibit everyone from using guns. If you have a gun in your home, voluntarily hand it over to the government. This is an honor because you have made contributions to the country, We don't think about 'whether this has made me lose the ability to confront the government', maybe it is,or it's not, we don't think about it.

We are always willing to sacrifice some personal interests for the benefit of the collective. This is our culture.We have lived in this culture for thousands of years

The problem is that the United States is not China. You have some cultures formed in American history, which are completely different. So it's really difficult for me to make a choice, which side makes more sense.
We have no qualifications to comment on who is right regarding these domestic affairs in the United States. We are not Americans.
But if we make choices solely based on Chinese ideology, we oppose LGBTQ, oppose immigration, oppose restrictions on abortion (people have the right to have abortions), oppose guns, and oppose all drugs.
 
I believe I can speak for 70% Chinese people, if not 80%. I am not rich, just an ordinary people ,"average joe".
And I want to say something about this "political ideology"

When I browse forums in the United States, I find that people frequently use terms such as "authoritarianism", "democracy", "capitalism", "socialism", "communism", etc.

But in China, we rarely discuss these concepts. Because we are realistic creatures. If you have seen some interviews from John Mearsheimer, you will find that he often mentions this point.

In our views, authoritarian governments are not that “authoritarian”, and democratic elections are not that “democratic”.

Even when we mention communism, it seems like we're talking about the "great working class, good people," but does the working class really have such great morals that people are willing to voluntarily work for the entire society in the absence of capitalist style compensation incentives? Obviously, the working class is not as that noble either.

What we believe is that when you encounter problems, you should try to find a solution to the problem, rather than being trapped by many complex concepts before solving the problem.

For example, when we find that the security situation is not good and there are many cases of theft and robbery, we will think like this: "We need to install some cameras on the street, and if someone commits a crime, we can know who they are." We do not feel that this violates our privacy, nor do we feel that we are being monitored by the government. Because we need cameras to control crime. The practical role of the camera is primary, and we will ignore other parts.

We certainly have reason to ignore the issue of whether the cameras on the streets have violated privacy, or whether this has put us under government surveillance, because you can always find some supporters and some opponents regarding these issues. If you want to argue, then the argument will never end, but life must continue.

The same reason applies to LGBTQ, regarding the legality of same-sex marriage. If you want to argue, you can always find supporters and opponents. So the government decides that "we don't discuss it.Keep it quiet".

Regarding the issue of "guns problem" in the United States, we know it involves the 2nd Amendment . If this issue occurred in China, we would think, "Do we have a problem with too many guns? Yes, so we have decided to prohibit everyone from using guns. If you have a gun in your home, voluntarily hand it over to the government. This is an honor because you have made contributions to the country, We don't think about 'whether this has made me lose the ability to confront the government', maybe it is,or it's not, we don't think about it.

We are always willing to sacrifice some personal interests for the benefit of the collective. This is our culture.We have lived in this culture for thousands of years

The problem is that the United States is not China. You have some cultures formed in American history, which are completely different. So it's really difficult for me to make a choice, which side makes more sense.
We have no qualifications to comment on who is right regarding these domestic affairs in the United States. We are not Americans.
But if we make choices solely based on Chinese ideology, we oppose LGBTQ, oppose immigration, oppose restrictions on abortion (people have the right to have abortions), oppose guns, and oppose all drugs.

yes.

we know.

authoritarians hate discussions and high level thought.

yes. you have been dehumanized, like cattle.

confucianism made you people worship mere bureaucratic apathy. (banality of evil)

buddhism and taoism are both better.

why did you persecute falun gong?

how did the cattle frame that one?

(I bet chinko won't address anything specific. he doesn't believe in discussions.

all he has is an anti-discussion tirade.

one trick pony.)
 
Last edited:
I believe I can speak for 70% Chinese people, if not 80%. I am not rich, just an ordinary people ,"average joe".
And I want to say something about this "political ideology"

When I browse forums in the United States, I find that people frequently use terms such as "authoritarianism", "democracy", "capitalism", "socialism", "communism", etc.

But in China, we rarely discuss these concepts. Because we are realistic creatures. If you have seen some interviews from John Mearsheimer, you will find that he often mentions this point.

In our views, authoritarian governments are not that “authoritarian”, and democratic elections are not that “democratic”.

Even when we mention communism, it seems like we're talking about the "great working class, good people," but does the working class really have such great morals that people are willing to voluntarily work for the entire society in the absence of capitalist style compensation incentives? Obviously, the working class is not as that noble either.

What we believe is that when you encounter problems, you should try to find a solution to the problem, rather than being trapped by many complex concepts before solving the problem.

For example, when we find that the security situation is not good and there are many cases of theft and robbery, we will think like this: "We need to install some cameras on the street, and if someone commits a crime, we can know who they are." We do not feel that this violates our privacy, nor do we feel that we are being monitored by the government. Because we need cameras to control crime. The practical role of the camera is primary, and we will ignore other parts.

We certainly have reason to ignore the issue of whether the cameras on the streets have violated privacy, or whether this has put us under government surveillance, because you can always find some supporters and some opponents regarding these issues. If you want to argue, then the argument will never end, but life must continue.

The same reason applies to LGBTQ, regarding the legality of same-sex marriage. If you want to argue, you can always find supporters and opponents. So the government decides that "we don't discuss it.Keep it quiet".

Regarding the issue of "guns problem" in the United States, we know it involves the 2nd Amendment . If this issue occurred in China, we would think, "Do we have a problem with too many guns? Yes, so we have decided to prohibit everyone from using guns. If you have a gun in your home, voluntarily hand it over to the government. This is an honor because you have made contributions to the country, We don't think about 'whether this has made me lose the ability to confront the government', maybe it is,or it's not, we don't think about it.

We are always willing to sacrifice some personal interests for the benefit of the collective. This is our culture.We have lived in this culture for thousands of years

The problem is that the United States is not China. You have some cultures formed in American history, which are completely different. So it's really difficult for me to make a choice, which side makes more sense.
We have no qualifications to comment on who is right regarding these domestic affairs in the United States. We are not Americans.
But if we make choices solely based on Chinese ideology, we oppose LGBTQ, oppose immigration, oppose restrictions on abortion (people have the right to have abortions), oppose guns, and oppose all drugs.

Hi, Jack. I find it difficult to believe that the average Chinese speaks English as well as you, and has read Orwell's books. But that is the way you feel, so ok.

Agreed, our cultures are different which is why I am glad you are here to share your POV (point of view). I think many liberals would agree with much of your ideology, except on homosexuality and transgenderism.

In summary, the average Chinese do not think, you obey. You do not question, you obey. Our democratic party shares those values with you. I have my doubts about your leaders making personal sacrifices. Our own leaders often do not.

You are not rich and successful. Is this because you are young?
 
Last edited:
Hi, Jack. I find it difficult to believe that the average Chinese speaks English as well as you, and has read Orwell's books. But that is the way you feel, so ok.

Agreed, our cultures are different which is why I am glad you are here to share your POV (point of view). I think many liberals would agree with much of your ideology, except on homosexuality and transgenderism.

In summary, the average Chinese do not think, you obey. You do not question, you obey. Our democratic party shares those values with you.

You are not rich. Is this because you are young?

he's ccp.
 
80% of employment positions are provided by private companies. Yes, when you calculate the size of a company, you will find that those state-owned companies are at the top of the list. But that's because of the nature of their business, companies like power transmission networks have a natural monopoly position. They are irreplaceable and therefore belong to the state.

Moreover, state-owned enterprises are not completely separated from the market. If the efficiency of enterprises is too poor, or if some enterprises lose the necessity of existence due to technological development, their status as state-owned enterprises will also be cancelled. This is commonly referred to as "state-owned enterprise reform".

Regarding the management of state-owned enterprises, this is a very complex issue, and I must admit that it goes beyond my knowledge.
But I can tell you a general principle that if an industry requires a lot of competition, flexible development paths, and does not threaten the stability of the entire country, then the industry will allow private capital to enter. The state encourages private capital to enter many industries, including aerospace technology. We now have many emerging private rocket companies. The country is helping them, providing convenience for personnel(Some people working in the state-owned aerospace sector are allowed to leave and join these private companies), and helping them build sites for commercial space launches. There are many examples like this.
China is not, as some people imagine, subjecting a large number of industries to state control and working according to plans due to ideology. In fact, many Western elites who have business dealings with China, those who appear on Bloomberg's economic forum, entrepreneurs, and people like Elon Musk, are well aware of China's economy.
Unfortunately, the true views of these entrepreneurs have been largely ignored, while publications like The Economist have written a large number of biased articles. This has resulted in a large amount of inaccurate views of China among ordinary Western people.

I am glad that China's middle class is growing. And you are able to invest in aerospace, instead of real estate being your only option. We have heard much about empty townships being built with middle class investment dollars, but never being occupied.
 
Last edited:
Jack.

there is much to admire about chinese culture. I love taoism, buddhism, and there is even wisdom in confucianism to a degree.

but the ccp is of foreign origin and has made your long and respectable national history into a toilet.

the boxer rebellion was warranted.

it's ok to hate the british.
 
Of course he is but a diplomatic response would not be to call him one.

Putin is a blood thirsty barbarian but if you invite him to America for a diplomatic summit, you don’t call him a blood thirsty barbarian.

I totally get you are used to the type of weak response from people like Trump, but Biden calling a spade a spade and not lying or playing 'politics' with it, as you love, is the proper thing to do.

Xi is a dictator. He did not say 'blood thirsty dictator' which he could have.

Biden or no one should pretend China is a democracy, or any other form of gov't, when asked such a direct question even if Magat's think kowtowing to please XI, so as not to hurt his 'feels' is the best way.
 
You Trumppers were sure China was about to attack Taiwan, today Xi has come to the U.S. hat in hand to beg us for economic investment.

Ass clown, I never mentioned Taiwan once. Lol, every remark you make is prefaced or revolves around Donald Trump. You are mad.

trump blaster.jpg
 
I totally get you are used to the type of weak response from people like Trump, but Biden calling a spade a spade and not lying or playing 'politics' with it, as you love, is the proper thing to do.

Xi is a dictator. He did not say 'blood thirsty dictator' which he could have.

Biden or no one should pretend China is a democracy, or any other form of gov't, when asked such a direct question even if Magat's think kowtowing to please XI, so as not to hurt his 'feels' is the best way.

so biden is gonna be tought with china?

how about tariffs?

that's more important and I challenge you to defend otherwise.
 
I am glad that China's middle class is growing. And you are able to invest in aerospace, instead of real estate being your only option. We have heard much about empty townships being built with middle class investment dollars, but never being occupied.

could there be an aerospace bubble?
 
America cannot give away either Taiwan or Ukraine. I know you were hoping your boy trump could get a good price for giving them away, but he will not be able to.

The best America could do is refuse to give them weapons. This would weaken them, but not give them away. And other countries are planning on how to replace the USA if trump is elected.

Meanwhile, Biden is trying to get them the most weapons he can.

putting taiwan and ukraine in the same bucket proves you're retarded.
:tardthoughts:
 
so biden is gonna be tought with china?

how about tariffs?

that's more important and I challenge you to defend otherwise.

There is a reason you see NO ONE discuss Tariffs with you and that is because you show a Grade 1 level understanding of the topic and yet have Marjorie Greene like opinions. No one wants to debate anything with MTG or you as there simply is no debate. You just spout and repeat and nonsense.

(inb4 his nonsensical reply)
 
There is a reason you see NO ONE discuss Tariffs with you and that is because you show a Grade 1 level understanding of the topic and yet have Marjorie Greene like opinions. No one wants to debate anything with MTG or you as there simply is no debate. You just spout and repeat and nonsense.

(inb4 his nonsensical reply)

wrong.

they all know they lose everytime.

it IS actually dumb to send all the jobs away.

or you can tell me right here, right now how it's smart to send all the jobs away.
 
Back
Top