Feminists like Darla Get Their Way: Kennedy Annointed Choice, Like it or not

Superfreak said:
so now you take on Dungs strategy of not answering questions. Nice. Pretty much shows that you have no real case to present. To suggest someone without name recognition can't win simply points out the arrogance of the idiots that blindly follow celebrity names.
Click to expand...


What questions haven't I answered? The bottom line is that you despise this woman for no other reason than she is a Kennedy and is seeking the appointment. That's really all that you know about her yet you find it sufficient to sneer at he with contempt and brand her an elitist.

It's quite funny, really. You, sir, are a hero to the great unwashed masses.
 
Jarod said:
I dont know, but it was CO-WRITTEN, why do you assume Kennedy did not have at least 50% to do with it?
Click to expand...

Are you taking classes from Dung or from Darla?

I did not 'assume' any such thing. I said I wonder how much was done by Alderman vs. Kennedy.
 
Superfreak said:
Because she is a woman YOU like, you ignore the fact that she has little experience or qualifications.

She is just another hooters girl hiking up her skirt and shaking her pom poms. Showing a little leg to get herself a position she doesn't deserve. Of course she was then embarrassed upon being told that Patterson couldn't actually see her. So she then turned to the political elite and got them to force Patterson into annoiting her.
Click to expand...

This from someone who supported George W. Bush for president.
 
Dungheap said:
What questions haven't I answered? The bottom line is that you despise this woman for no other reason than she is a Kennedy and is seeking the appointment. That's really all that you know about her yet you find it sufficient to sneer at he with contempt and brand her an elitist.

It's quite funny, really. You, sir, are a hero to the great unwashed masses.
Click to expand...

No dipshit. I do not despise her. I do despise the fact that she is being annointed by the power elite in NY with minimal consideration (if any) for other candidates. I just have a very hard time believing that out of all the potential candidates that Caroline Kennedy is the best NY has to offer. Given her sparse background she cannot be the most experienced or qualified.
 
Superfreak said:
No dipshit. I do not despise her. I do despise the fact that she is being annointed by the power elite in NY with minimal consideration (if any) for other candidates. I just have a very hard time believing that out of all the potential candidates that Caroline Kennedy is the best NY has to offer. Given her sparse background she cannot be the most experienced or qualified.
Click to expand...


You have a hard time believing it because you don't want to believe it and you don't want to believe it because her last name is Kennedy. I could present a signed affidavit from the greatest Senator ever to live stating that Kennedy is the singular most qualified person in all of New York to serve as Senator and you would dismiss it as the produce of his insider status as a Kennedy. Hence, we go round and round and round with it all coming back to you hating her because she is a Kennedy that didn't change her name when she got married.

As an aside, I like that you accuse me of not answering questions and then refuse to answer my question when I asked you to point out the questions I allegedly refuse to answer. It's cute.
 
Onceler said:
"The 'qualification' comes from this whole past three months of Palin not being 'qualified' to run for VP and now a female Kennedy comes along and its all out the window."

You get the difference between the executive & legislative branches, right?
Click to expand...

I would say Kennedy is more qualified to be a Senator than Palin was to be a VP.

Palin did not even understand that Africa was not a single nation.
 
Dungheap said:
You have a hard time believing it because you don't want to believe it and you don't want to believe it because her last name is Kennedy. I could present a signed affidavit from the greatest Senator ever to live stating that Kennedy is the singular most qualified person in all of New York to serve as Senator and you would dismiss it as the produce of his insider status as a Kennedy. Hence, we go round and round and round with it all coming back to you hating her because she is a Kennedy that didn't change her name when she got married.

As an aside, I like that you accuse me of not answering questions and then refuse to answer my question when I asked you to point out the questions I allegedly refuse to answer. It's cute.
Click to expand...

Again with your idiotic bullshit. Look at her past 30 years... what has she done?

She passed the bar, but does not appear to have ever practiced law.

She was good at fundraising.

She co-wrote two books and compiled a couple of poetry books.

Oh... lets not forget, she attended funerals and stuff on behalf of her family.

If you truly believe she is the most qualified woman in NY then either you are an idiot or NY is sadly lacking any strong female leaders.
 
"Today, 10:41 AM
Dungheap
Steamy
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,127



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Superfreak
Yeah, but is she ahead based on the public knowing anything about her other than her last name?


And round and round we go.
"

I asked a question and you responded accordingly. Then Darla used the same response. That is what I was referring to.

Another is...

What has Caroline done that makes her the best qualified candidate other than having been born with a great last name?

Once again, we will be hearing from the crickets.
 
Superfreak said:
"Today, 10:41 AM
Dungheap
Steamy
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,127



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Superfreak
Yeah, but is she ahead based on the public knowing anything about her other than her last name?


And round and round we go.
"

I asked a question and you responded accordingly. Then Darla used the same response. That is what I was referring to.

Another is...

What has Caroline done that makes her the best qualified candidate other than having been born with a great last name?

Once again, we will be hearing from the crickets.
Click to expand...


Oh, so you're upset that questions that you asked and that people answered several times over were not singularly addressed by me? I'm honored but really, get over yourself.

As I said and as the questions above reveal, all you are concerned with is her last name (and, previously, the fact that she kept it after she got married) and you discount anything else about her. It's funny how damn envious you are. Get over it. She's the next Senator of New York.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top