It's entirely possible. However when you maintain at the end the type of argument I just presented, total ad hominem, it does not 'prove' your point and suggests you have no data to back up your assertions or to prove the other wrong.I had an argument Damo, check back. SF was trying to minimalize the impact fo the thread with posturing about a minority of the cases in there, and he never properly addressed that, He just started to spin off stuff and insult me.
I do win this one
Good job Desh. You were able to find the paragraph talking about the bureaucratic nightmare I referred to. Now again, did this SAME problem occur PRIOR to Bush or was it all his fault?
I had an argument Damo, check back. SF was trying to minimalize the impact fo the thread with posturing about a minority of the cases in there, and he never properly addressed that, He just started to spin off stuff and insult me.
I do win this one
Never before has the DOJ been used in the manner the Bush admin has used it.
To try and say this has not been exsaserbatered by the Bush administration is bullshit.
:lmao:
the final phase denial.
No, you attempted to dismiss evidence that there was more than one person responsible. Whether you say directly or imply through dismissal it was the argument you were supporting with the fallacy that he had suggested that the importance was diminished by his evidence that it was more then an R problem.LOL, good one damo. You are doing the same thing, I never said it was all Bush's fault.
Ohh so predictable there dude.
Since 2001, 300 to 400 civil cases have been filed each year by employees charging that their companies defrauded the government. But under the cumbersome process that governs these cases, Justice Department lawyers must review them under seal, and whistle-blowers routinely wait 14 months or longer just to learn whether the department will get involved. The government rejects about three-quarters of the cases it receives, saying that the vast majority have little merit.
"I pointed out to Desh and you that this problem that supposedly was created by Bush Administration appointees was actually something that was going on long before Bush ever took office".
Face what you said SF
Desh. You did.Didnt you even fucking read the article you fool?
The reason they are holding them up is that Bush appoints political friends instead of professionals.
More dataless ad hominem. Unsupported by the actual data given in the thread. If I were you I'd just go somewhere else where I could actually use data, otherwise the water just rises as you dig the well deeper.A 2 crawfish race will Damo or SF win ?