Another Month Brings Another World Heat Record

1719031911794-png.1589199
 
No, the EPA is in the pocket of the radical environmental Left. One of the best indicators of this is how the EPA and those groups on the Left use "consent decrees" to make policy.


What the two do is collude where the EPA wants to regulate something but can't get it politically passed. So, they go to environmental groups off the record and help them sue the EPA who, of course, doesn't do much or anything to fight the suit. The two then agree to a consent decree rather than a court fight where the EPA is now legally obligated to regulate what they wanted to regulate all along.

The link above is one example of this were environmental groups sued the EPA to control methane flaring in oil fields and the EPA now gets to control methane flaring in oil fields.

Climate scientists in academia assist in this sort of collusion by producing "research" the EPA wants that backs Leftist environmental positions. This gives those groups the necessary supposed "expert opinions / research" to use to file their court cases which the EPA has encouraged them to do.
The EPA, as do other regulatory agencies, has the authority to promulgate rules and regulations that have the effect of law, without Congressional action. Congress has given them that authority. And there are specific requirements in those processes.

Now, on your specific case, the regs hadn’t been updated for 26 years. And seeing how technology has changed and that methane is an extremely powerful greenhouse gas, what the fuck do you think is wrong about updating the standards?
 
The EPA, as do other regulatory agencies, has the authority to promulgate rules and regulations that have the effect of law, without Congressional action. Congress has given them that authority. And there are specific requirements in those processes.

Now, on your specific case, the regs hadn’t been updated for 26 years. And seeing how technology has changed and that methane is an extremely powerful greenhouse gas, what the fuck do you think is wrong about updating the standards?



The EPA regularly oversteps their boundaries on regulation. On top of that, they defy Congress too.




The EPA today is a radical Leftist bureaucracy that tries it's damnedest to defy any oversight or regulatory control by the elected government. It is a vicious, malicious, and often devastating bunch of crazies who have a political--not scientific--agenda and will do anything to keep from being exposed.
 



The EPA regularly oversteps their boundaries on regulation. On top of that, they defy Congress too.




The EPA today is a radical Leftist bureaucracy that tries it's damnedest to defy any oversight or regulatory control by the elected government. It is a vicious, malicious, and often devastating bunch of crazies who have a political--not scientific--agenda and will do anything to keep from being exposed.
You missed the point. One can make an argument whether EPA oversteps their authority periodically or not.



The EPA regularly oversteps their boundaries on regulation. On top of that, they defy Congress too.




The EPA today is a radical Leftist bureaucracy that tries it's damnedest to defy any oversight or regulatory control by the elected government. It is a vicious, malicious, and often devastating bunch of crazies who have a political--not scientific--agenda and will do anything to keep from being exposed.
You misunderstood my post. My claim about it and other regulatory agencies still stands. Whether they periodically overstep their bounds is another matter. And one open for debate. Just like the debate on the constitutionality of the 10 Amendments.

You’ll notice that SCOTUS decisions go along ideological lines. Every time. Regarding the House Science and Technology committee? I’ve seen those Republican idiots in action. Your other reference is a conservative, anti-EPA group. No surprises there.
 
You missed the point. One can make an argument whether EPA oversteps their authority periodically or not.

You misunderstood my post. My claim about it and other regulatory agencies still stands. Whether they periodically overstep their bounds is another matter. And one open for debate. Just like the debate on the constitutionality of the 10 Amendments.

You’ll notice that SCOTUS decisions go along ideological lines. Every time. Regarding the House Science and Technology committee? I’ve seen those Republican idiots in action. Your other reference is a conservative, anti-EPA group. No surprises there.
No, the EPA oversteps its boundaries on a regular basis. Their methodology today is, Do it now and ask for forgiveness later if we get caught...
 
Perhaps you haven't noticed that there's an ACTUAL genocide in progress - and it's being conducted by genocidal Jews.
Perhaps you don't realize that the occupation of Palestine is illegal.
Perhaps you don't know that the genocidal Jews are holding 9,000 Palestinian hostages in their dungeons- including many women and children.
Perhaps you're unaware that these genocidal Jews have recently killed over 37,000 Palestinians- in their own country- 17,000 of them being children and most of the remainder being women.
Again, no occupation = no resistance to occupation.
The solution is for the genocidal Jews to withdraw back into the territory which is legally theirs and to give up their oft and loudly announced mantra of a ' Greater Israel ' consisting of all of Palestine with no Palestinians in it. Once they have done that then Palestine's resistance fighters will be redundant.
You're such a lying fucker as are all Marxists.
 
The EPA, as do other regulatory agencies, has the authority to promulgate rules and regulations that have the effect of law, without Congressional action. Congress has given them that authority. And there are specific requirements in those processes.
Congress does NOT have any authority to create the EPA or to pass any of it's authority to it.
Now, on your specific case, the regs hadn’t been updated for 26 years. And seeing how technology has changed and that methane is an extremely powerful greenhouse gas, what the fuck do you think is wrong about updating the standards?
No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. You cannot create energy out of nothing. You are still ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics.
 
You missed the point. One can make an argument whether EPA oversteps their authority periodically or not.
Congress does not have any authority to create the EPA and give them such power.
You misunderstood my post. My claim about it and other regulatory agencies still stands. Whether they periodically overstep their bounds is another matter. And one open for debate.
They overstep their bounds, because Congress never had any authority to create the agency in the first place.
Just like the debate on the constitutionality of the 10 Amendments.
The first ten amendments ARE constitutional, since they are PART OF THE CONSTITUTION, Dumber.
You’ll notice that SCOTUS decisions go along ideological lines. Every time. Regarding the House Science and Technology committee? I’ve seen those Republican idiots in action. Your other reference is a conservative, anti-EPA group. No surprises there.
SCOTUS has no authority to change the Constitution.
 
Back
Top