because no one else has.....the indictment...

PostmodernProphet said:
the full text of the indictment.........
Click to expand...

Why would anyone take advice from a slumlord lawyer who is not even at the level of a decent paralegal.

The crimes :

- False statements by Trump
- prompting others to make false statements (Cohen, Pecker and America Media Inc (AMI - National Enquirer, etc)
- paying off numerous people (Door man, women, etc)
- breaking of NY Election law - crime to conspire to promote a candidacy by unlawful means
- $130K wire payment exceeded contribution cap

For all to understand this slumlord lawyer you need to understand that he thinks and argues it is perfectly legal for Trump to provide flow thru payments to Cohen that go to Stormy as long as Cohen books it as legal services. He argues that is enough to protect Trump.

That would be like you sending money to close on a real estate purchase, the lawyer sends it out and it is all booked as legal service with the person who got the benefit (the real estate) not having to denote they PART of that money that just flowed thru and was for real estate.

he does truly believe Trump has a checkmate as they conspired to book the payments as 'legal services' thus Trump cannot be prosecuted. That is how dumb this "lawyer" is?

 
PostmodernProphet said:
you know they have to be shown long before a trial.....and it is unheard of that they are not part of the indictment.......or has the statute of limitations run on those as well......oh my......is Bragg screwed upside AND downside?.....
Click to expand...

Again the slumlord lawyer showing he has no clue as it is VERY COMMON in NY to not lay out all those details until closer to trial. The Trump team will be able to request and compel more detail, but this is the norm even if a slum lawyer will tell you it is unheard of.
 
QP! said:
Why would anyone take advice from a slumlord lawyer
Click to expand...

because I make you look like pathetic children on a daily basis.......

The crimes :

- False statements by Trump
- prompting others to make false statements (Cohen, Pecker and America Media Inc (AMI - National Enquirer, etc)
- paying off numerous people (Door man, women, etc)
- breaking of NY Election law - crime to conspire to promote a candidacy by unlawful means
- $130K wire payment exceeded contribution cap
Click to expand...

cite the statutes pseudo-Bragg......

argues it is perfectly legal for Trump to provide flow thru payments to Cohen that go to Stormy
Click to expand...

uh dude......it IS perfectly legal for Trump to provide payments through Cohen that go to Stormy.....
 
QP! said:
Again the slumlord lawyer showing he has no clue as it is VERY COMMON in NY to not lay out all those details until closer to trial. The Trump team will be able to request and compel more detail, but this is the norm even if a slum lawyer will tell you it is unheard of.
Click to expand...

apparently its also common in NY for Dollar General cashiers to give legal advice........lol.....get your hand out of that till, boy!.......you're gonna get fired.....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
...uh dude......it IS perfectly legal for Trump to provide payments through Cohen that go to Stormy.....
Click to expand...

lol at the slum lawyer still arguing you can give your lawyer money to buy real estate for you, and you (the buyer) can just book the entire transaction as 'legal fees' and not disclose the real estate portion of the flow thru seperately.

You can't make this shit up. This guy claims to be a lawyer who does not understand that the above. And just because Cohen paid it does not make 100% of the payment 'legal fees'. The portion that flows thru to buy the real estate or pay off Stormy has to be PROPERLY booked as such and just saying 'legal fees' is not legal.


You are painfully stupid and thus why you focus on slumlord law. It is well known as the bottom of the barrel law for the daft. 99% legal filings against unrepresented people. Work a low level paralegal can do.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
because I make you look like pathetic children on a daily basis.......



cite the statutes pseudo-Bragg......

....
Click to expand...

Watch the video dude as Bragg explains the two areas of law (statutes) that were broken.

Why would you want me to paraphrase what the D.A says for himself? IS it because you need help with the big words?
 
QP! said:
lol at the slum lawyer still arguing you can give your lawyer money to buy real estate for you o.
Click to expand...

no.....we've already realized you haven't got a fucking clue here......stormy didn't buy land.......

you said it was illegal for Trump to provide payments through Cohen that go to Stormy......it simply isn't.......its not my fault you are stupid enough to think it is........just like Bragg can't name the felony Trump intended to commit when he wrote a check to his lawyer, you can't name a law that prevents Trump from providing payment through Cohen that go to Stormy......cope......

nor has anyone said 100% of the payment was legal fees......

by the way, I couldn't be a slumlord lawyer.......I stay away from your apartment.....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
no.....we've already realized you haven't got a fucking clue here......stormy didn't buy land.......

you said it was illegal for Trump to provide payments through Cohen that go to Stormy......it simply isn't.......its not my fault you are stupid enough to think it is........just like Bragg can't name the felony Trump intended to commit when he wrote a check to his lawyer, you can't name a law that prevents Trump from providing payment through Cohen that go to Stormy......cope......

nor has anyone said 100% of the payment was legal fees......

by the way, I couldn't be a slumlord lawyer.......I stay away from your apartment.....
Click to expand...

No slum lawyer you have no clue.

- Cohen gave Stormy a SUM of money that was a flow thru from Trump
- Trump then paid Cohen SOME fees for doing so but ALSO a big portion that was to cover the flow thru to Stormy

Both Trump and Cohen hid the fact of the portion that was paid to Stormy (the flow thru amount) and THAT is against the law.


You as a Derp keep saying 'but... but... COhen booked it as fees and Trump can pay fees' as that is how stupid you are. Trump and Cohen MUST declare and book the flow thru amount properly and broke the law in not doing so.

Whether your lawyer is forwarding the money to buy real estate or as hush money to a porn star it CANNOT be hidden as 'legal fees'.
 
Again i just want people clear on how stupid PostmodernProphet is despite claiming he is a slumlord lawyer.


Lawyers forward payments on behalf of clients all the time as normal course and they bill Legal Fees for doing so. Many lawyer have Trust Accounts to manage this, as it is a big part of their practice.

Some examples are :

- buying real estate
- buying a company
- paying a legal settlement when you lose a lawsuit
- paying for non disclosure agreements
- paying off to silence allegations such as Stormy's that could harm your reputation

There are hundreds more i could list.

In NONE of those can the Lawyer and Client hide what the money actual paid to the 3rd was for by just calling it 'Legal Fees' and they must SEPARATE the charge for the legal work from the triggering event that caused the legal work to be done (real estate, settlement, hush money, etc).

PostModernProphet will reply 'But it was not real estate., it was not buying a company,' so calling it legal fees is ok and legal. He is wrong. Wrong and stupid. It does not matter which of ANY of the above the Lawyer and CLient misclassify as 'Legal Fees', the portion paid to the third party (Stormys hush payment money) MUST be booked by both the Lawyer and Trump properly and not as legal fees.


Inb4 PostmodernProphet astounds with more stupidity not understanding the above.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
the full text of the indictment....
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-indictment-34-felony-counts-charges-new-york-read/

1) first impression, there are not 34 felony indictments......there is only one alleged crime......"FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE"....

all Bragg did was repeat the same charge for 34 different line items on Trump's business ledgers......thus he will be required to prove the exact same things to get a conviction on any one of them.

2) Proposed standard jury instructions for the crime of Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree in the state of New York.

https://nycourts.gov/judges/cji/2-PenalLaw/175/175.10.pdf

these are the things Bragg must prove beyond a reasonable doubt for each of the 34 different line items...

a) Under our law, a person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree when, with intent to defraud that includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof, (there must be i) another crime, ii) the defendant intended to commit or conceal the commission, iii) is the person who makes or causes a false entry in the business records of an enterprise; or alters, erases, obliterates, deletes, removes or destroys a true entry in the business records of an enterprise; or omits to make a true entry in the business records of an enterprise in violation of a duty to do so which he or she knows to be imposed upon him or her by law or by the nature of his or her position; or prevents the making of a true entry or causes the omission thereof in the business records of an enterprise.

Bragg's problems under this standard....
1) there is no other crime....
2) he will not be able to prove intent to commit or conceal....
3) there is no way anyone believes Trump was the person who made a false entry or caused someone else to make a false entry on his ledgers...he's not a bookkeeper......at best the evidence will show that Cohen's office sent their monthly statements and some accountant decided which budget to assign it to.....
Click to expand...

The entire indictment which makes no mention of the crime.

https://www.scribd.com/document/636100145/Trump-statement-of-facts
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top