because no one else has.....the indictment...

Earl said:
If this was adjudicated away from NY in a location with fair minded jurors and a non-Trump hating D/A and judge, there would never be a conviction.
Click to expand...

There never would have been an indictment. It takes a special brand of stupid New Yorkers to come up with nonsense like this. But hey, this is the party that is trying to drag us down to third world mediocrity.
 
Jarod said:
It’s always because someone was biased against him, never Trumps fault. Just like Jesus.
Click to expand...

How can there be fault when he's done nothing wrong other than trigger dishonest leftist hacks like you? If you are trying to argue that the DOJ is not biased against the man that poses the greatest threat to the Democratic Party of Lying Jackasses and the corrupt hacks in Washington DC, you're a lying loon.
 
Concart said:
So Earl thinks the judge should declare himself biased and grant summary judgement. ROTFLMFAO!! Cracker Jack box law degree. Earl just tosses around legal terms without having the faintest idea what they mean.

Hey Earl you dumb motherfucker the JUDGE ASSIGNED TO THE CASE grants summary judgment. He does so when no facts are in dispute. You are a fucking moron.
Click to expand...

Wrong; but then, because you are mentally retarded and a lying sociopath, understanding basic concepts is beyond your extremely low IQ level.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
the full text of the indictment....
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-indictment-34-felony-counts-charges-new-york-read/

1) first impression, there are not 34 felony indictments......there is only one alleged crime......"FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE"....

all Bragg did was repeat the same charge for 34 different line items on Trump's business ledgers......thus he will be required to prove the exact same things to get a conviction on any one of them.

2) Proposed standard jury instructions for the crime of Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree in the state of New York.

https://nycourts.gov/judges/cji/2-PenalLaw/175/175.10.pdf

these are the things Bragg must prove beyond a reasonable doubt for each of the 34 different line items...

a) Under our law, a person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree when, with intent to defraud that includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof, (there must be i) another crime, ii) the defendant intended to commit or conceal the commission, iii) is the person who makes or causes a false entry in the business records of an enterprise; or alters, erases, obliterates, deletes, removes or destroys a true entry in the business records of an enterprise; or omits to make a true entry in the business records of an enterprise in violation of a duty to do so which he or she knows to be imposed upon him or her by law or by the nature of his or her position; or prevents the making of a true entry or causes the omission thereof in the business records of an enterprise.

Bragg's problems under this standard....
1) there is no other crime....
2) he will not be able to prove intent to commit or conceal....
3) there is no way anyone believes Trump was the person who made a false entry or caused someone else to make a false entry on his ledgers...he's not a bookkeeper......at best the evidence will show that Cohen's office sent their monthly statements and some accountant decided which budget to assign it to.....
Click to expand...

1) Then Trump is off the hook Bragg purposely set for himself. As between the NY District Attorney and an Internet blabber with minute legal credentials, don't bet on the latter.

2) The Internet blabber hasn't the faintest idea of what Bragg will be able to prove.

3) It couldn't be easier to believe Trump instructed "someone" to make the false entry(s) in view of their value in concealing the affair.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
the full text of the indictment....
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-indictment-34-felony-counts-charges-new-york-read/

1) first impression, there are not 34 felony indictments......there is only one alleged crime......"FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE"....

all Bragg did was repeat the same charge for 34 different line items on Trump's business ledgers......thus he will be required to prove the exact same things to get a conviction on any one of them.

2) Proposed standard jury instructions for the crime of Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree in the state of New York.

https://nycourts.gov/judges/cji/2-PenalLaw/175/175.10.pdf

these are the things Bragg must prove beyond a reasonable doubt for each of the 34 different line items...

a) Under our law, a person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree when, with intent to defraud that includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof, (there must be i) another crime, ii) the defendant intended to commit or conceal the commission, iii) is the person who makes or causes a false entry in the business records of an enterprise; or alters, erases, obliterates, deletes, removes or destroys a true entry in the business records of an enterprise; or omits to make a true entry in the business records of an enterprise in violation of a duty to do so which he or she knows to be imposed upon him or her by law or by the nature of his or her position; or prevents the making of a true entry or causes the omission thereof in the business records of an enterprise.

Bragg's problems under this standard....
1) there is no other crime....
2) he will not be able to prove intent to commit or conceal....
3) there is no way anyone believes Trump was the person who made a false entry or caused someone else to make a false entry on his ledgers...he's not a bookkeeper......at best the evidence will show that Cohen's office sent their monthly statements and some accountant decided which budget to assign it to.....
Click to expand...

Hahaha!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top