PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
what is it?.......same question the whole country is asking and no one knows the answer to.....
because no one else has.....the indictment...
- Thread starter PostmodernProphet
- Start date
what is it?.......same question the whole country is asking and no one knows the answer to.....
In due time. Patience pays.
I will give you a hint, check out, Bragg’s after the arraignment. In that speech, he mentioned three maybe four possibilities.
Federal election campaign laws
State election campaign laws
Federal tax law
State tax law
And something to do with Corporate filings by the national inquirer.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
I love your speculation and Bragg's......the sad thing is, its still all he has......
If you commit 34 murders, there are 34 counts for violating one law 34 times.
QP!
Verified User
FLOL.
Classic you are backpedaling like a scared little child caught.
You absolutely took the position that you want to deny now, that you understand how wrong you were, that Trump had done nothing illegal as he had only paid Cohen 'legal fees'. You were saying Cohen could classify all the money paid to Stormy that way and as long as Trump was paying that invoice saying 'legal fees' Trump was clear.
I explained to you that is not how it worked. That the money flowing thru to Stormy is NOT legal fees. The first 2-3 times you clearly did not understand but as i fleshed it out, it became clear you finally understood your error. That is when you backpedalling began.
ANd any one reading this can mark this here now. PostmodernProphet is now claiming that Alvin Bragg has no underlying statute. He is wrong on that i have told him that. I have explained that under NYS law Bragg is under no obligation to share that at this point. Prophet says i am wrong on that. As a claimed lawyer he has taken position Bragg did not identify a statute and is proceeding to court not knowing what the charge is. As it dawns on Prophet he is wrong he will begin to backpedal from this position too. He will pretend this was not his claim. SO mark this down now and laugh at him when you see him backpedaling.
They are LEGAL opinions from university legal expert's dumbass.
You're deflecting. We're talking about NAMING the crime statute he has violated. SIXTH amendment halfwit. Read it.
Another dishonest and moronic statement. That is all this is about, public opinion. Even the loons on MSNBC and CNN call it the weakest of cases to be brought against a former President. Your claims are as moronic as Braggs.
I have read the entire indictment snowflake. It doesn't name the statute or the crime. DUH!
But go ahead and tell us what Bragg is claiming that he hasn't named yet. Should be fun ripping that stupidity apart as well.
True
God you are beyond stupid.
First you ask if I have read it, and now admit it hasn't been identified. Like I said, lying leftist halfwits can't remember what they posted five minutes ago.
That is a bullshit narrative promoted by morons. The Sixth Amendment is clear and trumps any State law claims. I would like you to post the New York State law that says you don't have to tell a defendant what crime they have committed when indicted. It's stupid in its face and Unconstitutional at best.
How do you know this? Oh, that's right, you don't so you're making your foolish bullshit up as you go.
The evidence we do have that it was leaked is the media saying their sources tell them there will be 34 counts. I guess it was a "lucky" guess, right halfwit?
Moron. Falsifying business records is a misdemeanor with a two-year statute of limitations, which has run out. God you're stupid.
Last edited:
How do you know this? Oh, that's right, you don't so you're making your foolish bullshit as you go.
The evidence we do have that it was leaked is the media saying their sources tell them there will be 34 counts. I guess it was a "lucky" guess, right halfwit?
Moron. Falsifying business records is a misdemeanor with a two-year statute of limitations, which has run out. God you're stupid.
NY Penal Code 175.10 is a felony.
Which indicates you're a gullible dumbass who buys the bullshit you are fed by the media. Ironic that you seem to proud of your ignorance and stupidity.
This ^ is the difference between leftist Democrats and Conservatives, or morons versus intelligence. Morons on the left hate Trump because the media tells them they should. They don't know the man, they don't know his family, they don't associate with him or even credit him for the great things he did.
Whereas Conservatives don't hate Biden. We hate what he is doing to our country, or economy and its citizens.
That's why I call leftist Morons and halfwits. Not because I want to hurl insults, but because they really are morons and halfwits. Look at who they vote for.
I am sorry, but since when does a charging Prosecutor not have to name the crime and can choose from a cornucopia of possibilities? How fucking stupid are you?
Moron chimes in. Have you been an insufferable dumbass all your life, or is this something you have learned to be?
I am sorry, but since when does a charging Prosecutor not have to name the crime and can choose from a cornucopia of possibilities? How fucking stupid are you?
A prosecutor must name the crime.
Bragg named a crime. NY PC 175.10
One step above misdemeanor. Five years statute of limitation. When did the supposed crime occur? Dipshit.
Class E Felony Fines – With a few exceptions for drug-related Class A, Class B, and Class C felonies, most felonies in New York are subject to one of the following:
A maximum fine of $5,000.
A maximum fine equivalent to double the amount the defendant made by committing the crime. For example, if the crime earned the defendant $4,000, he or she could be fined up to $8,000.
Class E Felony Sentencing – The maximum sentence is the same for a violent or non-violent Class E felony. However, there are slight variations at the lower end of the sentencing ranges, as follows:
Class E Non-Violent Felony – No prison (probation); 1 1/3 to 4 years
Class E Violent Felony – No prison (probation); 1 ½ to 4 years
That is not the charge he is being accused of, if so, case dismissed based on the Statute of limitations halfwit.