because no one else has.....the indictment...

You absolutely took the position that you want to deny now, that you understand how wrong you were, that Trump had done nothing illegal as he had only paid Cohen 'legal fees'. You were saying Cohen could classify all the money paid to Stormy that way and as long as Trump was paying that invoice saying 'legal fees' Trump was clear.


no....sorry.....you looked like an idiot when you pretended I said that and you still look like an idiot.....but at least that means you are consistent.......anyone that doubts it can go back and read what I said.......something you have obviously never done.....
 
no....sorry.....you looked like an idiot when you pretended I said that and you still look like an idiot.....but at least that means you are consistent.......anyone that doubts it can go back and read what I said.......something you have obviously never done.....

Nothing makes me laugh more than you trying desperately to backpedal from what you said once i finally get thru ho wrong you were.

Your next backpedal, and i will quote this post, will be when you finally realize you are wrong in your position as a slum lord lawyer that Bragg is beginning charges but has no statute. You will be proven factual wrong (and me right again) andyou will pretend you never said and the backpedaling will begin.

WateryIlliterateAmericanavocet-size_restricted.gif
 
Nothing makes me laugh more than you trying desperately to backpedal from what you said once i finally get thru ho wrong you were.

Your next backpedal, and i will quote this post, will be when you finally realize you are wrong in your position as a slum lord lawyer that Bragg is beginning charges but has no statute. You will be proven factual wrong (and me right again) andyou will pretend you never said and the backpedaling will begin.
you do realize you're a fucking idiot, right......nothing you have posted since the indictment came out has been true.......if people want to know if I have said any of the crap you pretend I said, all they have to do is read my posts and laugh at you.......
 
you do realize you're a fucking idiot, right......nothing you have posted since the indictment came out has been true.......if people want to know if I have said any of the crap you pretend I said, all they have to do is read my posts and laugh at you.......

Says the guy who genuinely believed that as long as a lawyer writes a receipt saying 'Legal Fees' that gives Trump cover for the flow thru payment to Stormie.

FLOL at how fast you got religion and backpedaled from your prior view once i forced facts and truth about the law on you.
 
I see three “other crimes” 1) tax evasion, 2) Federal campaign fraud, 3) State campaign fraud. There is also some fraud related with American Media and false records.

I understand that there are audio recordings w/ trump discussing how the ledgers were to be set up.

You keep saying this but no proof offered yet. Given your past performance here I will assume you're lying until you produce the audio files.
 
You keep saying this but no proof offered yet. Given your past performance here I will assume you're lying until you produce the audio files.

Ok, stay uninformed. You often chose that when you don’t like reality. Or read the statement of facts…
 
the full text of the indictment....
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-indictment-34-felony-counts-charges-new-york-read/

1) first impression, there are not 34 felony indictments......there is only one alleged crime......"FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE"....

all Bragg did was repeat the same charge for 34 different line items on Trump's business ledgers......thus he will be required to prove the exact same things to get a conviction on any one of them.

2) Proposed standard jury instructions for the crime of Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree in the state of New York.

https://nycourts.gov/judges/cji/2-PenalLaw/175/175.10.pdf

these are the things Bragg must prove beyond a reasonable doubt for each of the 34 different line items...

a) Under our law, a person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree when, with intent to defraud that includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof, (there must be i) another crime, ii) the defendant intended to commit or conceal the commission, iii) is the person who makes or causes a false entry in the business records of an enterprise; or alters, erases, obliterates, deletes, removes or destroys a true entry in the business records of an enterprise; or omits to make a true entry in the business records of an enterprise in violation of a duty to do so which he or she knows to be imposed upon him or her by law or by the nature of his or her position; or prevents the making of a true entry or causes the omission thereof in the business records of an enterprise.

Bragg's problems under this standard....
1) there is no other crime....
2) he will not be able to prove intent to commit or conceal....
3) there is no way anyone believes Trump was the person who made a false entry or caused someone else to make a false entry on his ledgers...he's not a bookkeeper......at best the evidence will show that Cohen's office sent their monthly statements and some accountant decided which budget to assign it to.....
Indeed.

If this was adjudicated away from NY in a location with fair minded jurors and a non-Trump hating D/A and judge, there would never be a conviction.

A Summary Judgement would be more than appropriate.
 
Indeed.

If this was adjudicated away from NY in a location with fair minded jurors and a non-Trump hating D/A and judge, there would never be a conviction.

A Summary Judgement would be more than appropriate.

It’s always because someone was biased against him, never Trumps fault. Just like Jesus.
 
Right, the Statement of Facts is a separate document filed by AG Bragg. Look it up.

you linked it I read it......there again is no listing of any felony Trump intended to conceal......Bragg should have filed a better statement of facts......oh wait, he couldn't......he was limited to facts wasn't he.....
 
you linked it I read it......there again is no listing of any felony Trump intended to conceal......Bragg should have filed a better statement of facts......oh wait, he couldn't......he was limited to facts wasn't he.....

No felony necessary.
 
So Earl thinks the judge should declare himself biased and grant summary judgement. ROTFLMFAO!! Cracker Jack box law degree. Earl just tosses around legal terms without having the faintest idea what they mean.

Hey Earl you dumb motherfucker the JUDGE ASSIGNED TO THE CASE grants summary judgment. He does so when no facts are in dispute. You are a fucking moron.
 
Back
Top