because no one else has.....the indictment...

Jarod said:
I see three “other crimes” 1) tax evasion, 2) Federal campaign fraud, 3) State campaign fraud. There is also some fraud related with American Media and false records.
Click to expand...

Where were those listed in the indictment halfwit? Bragg didn't name any crimes. He refused to when asked by the media. :palm:

Jarod said:
I understand that there are audio recordings w/ trump discussing how the ledgers were to be set up.
Click to expand...

Only an uneducated leftist moron thinks a billionaire owner will get into a discussion about ledgers and how to account for things in his billion-dollar empire.

You're beyond mere stupid.
 
BidenPresident said:
Trump seems to take it seriously.
Click to expand...

Trump takes his responsibility as a citizen seriously. He doesn't take the bullshit Bragg is dishing out serious. It's laughably weak and partisan.

When this is thrown out of court, who reimburses Trump and the taxpayers of New York for all the costs to even deal with this unserious ludicrous partisan hack job?
 
Truth Detector said:
Trump takes his responsibility as a citizen seriously. He doesn't take the bullshit Bragg is dishing out serious. It's laughably weak and partisan.

When this is thrown out of court, who reimburses Trump and the taxpayers of New York for all the costs to even deal with this unserious ludicrous partisan hack job?
Click to expand...

go kill yourself you piece of shit troll
 
Jarod said:
Not n the indictment because they don’t need to be.
Click to expand...

That is a moronic response from morons. If you are going to make history and indict a former President of the United States in the very public proceeding, you better have a REAL good reason for it. Of course, this pathetic lying hack of a DA doesn't.
 
Truth Detector said:
Where were those listed in the indictment halfwit? Bragg didn't name any crimes. He refused to when asked by the media. :palm:



Only an uneducated leftist moron thinks a billionaire owner will get into a discussion about ledgers and how to account for things in his billion-dollar empire.

You're beyond mere stupid.
Click to expand...

No requirement that they be listed in the indictment.

We will see testimony about what type of an owner Trump was.

You believe it was a “billion dollar empire”? You really fell for him hard didn’t you.
 
Truth Detector said:
Of course you don't. You get your narratives from MSNBC like the willful idiot we know you to be. :palm:
Click to expand...

TD, I've just gotta say - and you can of course choose not to listen - but when you constantly insult, it makes persuasion almost impossible. Most will dismiss your responses immediately as soon as they see the same derogatory name-calling over & over.

Just a thought. Obviously, if you just want to insult people, it's going fine. But if you really want to try to change a mind or two, you'd benefit from adjusting your posting style.
 
Jarod said:
Correct… we are not at trial yet.

There are at least three, state, tax, evasion, federal tax evasion, state campaign laws.
Click to expand...

Really? Fascinating that seven years later still no charges. You would think the IRS would be all over this. You really are proving what a dumb, low IQ partisan hack you are.
 
QP! said:
Why would anyone take advice from a slumlord lawyer who is not even at the level of a decent paralegal.

The crimes :

- False statements by Trump
- prompting others to make false statements (Cohen, Pecker and America Media Inc (AMI - National Enquirer, etc)
- paying off numerous people (Door man, women, etc)
- breaking of NY Election law - crime to conspire to promote a candidacy by unlawful means
- $130K wire payment exceeded contribution cap

For all to understand this slumlord lawyer you need to understand that he thinks and argues it is perfectly legal for Trump to provide flow thru payments to Cohen that go to Stormy as long as Cohen books it as legal services. He argues that is enough to protect Trump.

That would be like you sending money to close on a real estate purchase, the lawyer sends it out and it is all booked as legal service with the person who got the benefit (the real estate) not having to denote they PART of that money that just flowed thru and was for real estate.

he does truly believe Trump has a checkmate as they conspired to book the payments as 'legal services' thus Trump cannot be prosecuted. That is how dumb this "lawyer" is?
Click to expand...

Fascinating bullshit mental case. Bragg himself has not revealed what crimes Trump is charged with halfwit. What a moron. NO wonder you're a Biden voter.
 
QP! said:
Again i just want people clear on how stupid PostmodernProphet is despite claiming he is a slumlord lawyer.


Lawyers forward payments on behalf of clients all the time as normal course and they bill Legal Fees for doing so. Many lawyer have Trust Accounts to manage this, as it is a big part of their practice.

Some examples are :

- buying real estate
- buying a company
- paying a legal settlement when you lose a lawsuit
- paying for non disclosure agreements
- paying off to silence allegations such as Stormy's that could harm your reputation

There are hundreds more i could list.

In NONE of those can the Lawyer and Client hide what the money actual paid to the 3rd was for by just calling it 'Legal Fees' and they must SEPARATE the charge for the legal work from the triggering event that caused the legal work to be done (real estate, settlement, hush money, etc).

PostModernProphet will reply 'But it was not real estate., it was not buying a company,' so calling it legal fees is ok and legal. He is wrong. Wrong and stupid. It does not matter which of ANY of the above the Lawyer and CLient misclassify as 'Legal Fees', the portion paid to the third party (Stormys hush payment money) MUST be booked by both the Lawyer and Trump properly and not as legal fees.


Inb4 PostmodernProphet astounds with more stupidity not understanding the above.
Click to expand...

its really sort of sad that you think you are right......but I like it when you look stupid.......meanwhile no one knows what this felony Trump is believed to have intended to conceal, is supposed to be.......
 
T. A. Gardner said:
What you would normally expect in bringing this charge against someone would reasonably be:

The crime that was concealed, or committed, would be charged along with the business records charge,

That the concealing or defrauding is specifically shown in the criminal charge that brought the business records charge,

and that it can be shown the entries were intentional.

I don't see where Bragg, by his own admission, has any of that here.
Click to expand...
LOL.

You 'don't see'?

There are audio recordings. The trial hasn't even begun
 
Truth Detector said:
That is a moronic response from morons. If you are going to make history and indict a former President of the United States in the very public proceeding, you better have a REAL good reason for it. Of course, this pathetic lying hack of a DA doesn't.
Click to expand...

That’s not how it works, the trial is time for proving your case.
 
QP! said:
Again the slumlord lawyer showing he has no clue as it is VERY COMMON in NY to not lay out all those details until closer to trial. The Trump team will be able to request and compel more detail, but this is the norm even if a slum lawyer will tell you it is unheard of.
Click to expand...

They cannot wait until it gets closer to trial you ignorant mental case. It has to come out within the next few months or be dropped. You cannot indict without naming the crimes the defendant is being charged with. There is also a process called discovery where the evidence is provided the defense. So far, NOTHING.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top