because no one else has......Willis, Fulton County Prosecutor..

Geeko Sportivo said:
Yes, He's BUTT HURT AND HAS IT BAD!! He's just realized he's old and disgruntled, and he'll never see another Republican President in what's left of his short little time he has left on Earth!

He can't get this vision out of his head now!

https://media.tenor.com/ShSJShrlO94AAAAd/trump-prison.gif
Click to expand...
Most JPP Trumpers are elderly and appear to have the minds of petulant children. If they can't have the country exactly the way they want it, then they'll burn it down.

7vu30d.jpg
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I find it interesting that Fani Willis, who recently filed an arrest warrant against Trump for saying the Fulton County 2020 election violated the US constitution (correctly), was elected to the position of District Attorney of Fulton County in that same unconstitutional 2020 election.....
Click to expand...

use your words.

Explain what exactly you 'find' interesting so when we shred your stupidity you do not just shift the goal posts.

Did you find it interesting that Trump won his seat in the 2016 GE he was claiming was rigged?
That he won the primaries leading up to 2016 that he claimed were rigged?


Any time Trump thinks he might potentially lose ANY election, he starts crying 'rigged', and yet many other people get elected, Trump included.

So what makes such a thing happening 'interesting'?
 
Tinkerpeach said:
I have studied it, I know law very well, there is no actual law that Trump broke, that's why they are going for conspiracy.

Believe me, if Trump broke an actual law they would have charged him with that.

It's almost impossible to prove conspiracy in a court of law beyond a reasonable doubt.

And if you do manage to get a jury to buy it it's usually overturned on appeal.

This is because of the lack of actual proof of any crime broken.
Click to expand...

You do realize that Denial is not a river in Africa yanno?
 
Tinkerpeach said:
I have studied it, I know law very well, there is no actual law that Trump broke, that's why they are going for conspiracy.

Believe me, if Trump broke an actual law they would have charged him with that.

It's almost impossible to prove conspiracy in a court of law beyond a reasonable doubt.

And if you do manage to get a jury to buy it it's usually overturned on appeal.

This is because of the lack of actual proof of any crime broken.
Click to expand...

Not only do you NOT know law very well. You do not know anything but conspiracy derp stuff well.

It leads you to make stupid statements like 'it's almost impossible to prove conspiracy in a court of law' when conspiracies are charged and convicted all the time and they are not over turned. You are simply factual wrong on that, and speaking from ignorance but that never stops you Marjorie Greene.

Almost all gang or mob activity involve conspiracy charges, as they are acts by more than one individual. Many white collar crime institutional offenses are charged as conspiracies as they involve many executives covering things up.

Conspiracies are a bed rock of law charged and convicted and held up all the time.
 
Doc Dutch said:
Most JPP Trumpers are elderly and appear to have the minds of petulant children. If they can't have the country exactly the way they want it, then they'll burn it down.
Click to expand...

It looks like the Republitards are now following Donnie's lead on how he handles adversity!

trump-golf.gif
 
QP! said:
Not only do you NOT know law very well. You do not know anything but conspiracy derp stuff well.

It leads you to make stupid statements like 'it's almost impossible to prove conspiracy in a court of law' when conspiracies are charged and convicted all the time and they are not over turned. You are simply factual wrong on that, and speaking from ignorance but that never stops you Marjorie Greene.

Almost all gang or mob activity involve conspiracy charges, as they are acts by more than one individual. Many white collar crime institutional offenses are charged as conspiracies as they involve many executives covering things up.

Conspiracies are a bed rock of law charged and convicted and held up all the time.
Click to expand...

To prove a conspiracy the prosecution has to prove there was an agreement between Trump and others to commit a criminal act.
 
Tinkerpeach said:
To prove a conspiracy the prosecution has to prove there was an agreement between Trump and others to commit a criminal act.
Click to expand...

To prove a conspiracy you need initial agreement on a broad act between two or more people, and then any action taken in furtherance of that agreement.

Meaning you and another derp both agree you should rob a bank, and derp 2 then goes off and gets tools to rob a bank, and the police jump in, and you are both guilty. Does not matter if you actually went thru with it. Does not matter if you did not agree with him going to get those tools.


If Trump at any point agreed with others in a room, that they must stop or slow the electoral ballots count within the States. They must stop or slow Pence accepting or reading them. They must interrupt the counting and delay the proceeding. Then even if Trump never agreed to any specific action taken, he is still responsible for all actions taken to further that initial agreement.


it looks like evidence will be presented Trump was very directly involved in all of those areas, let alone one of them.
 
QP! said:
To prove a conspiracy you need initial agreement on a broad act between two or more people, and then any action taken in furtherance of that agreement.

Meaning you and another derp both agree you should rob a bank, and derp 2 then goes off and gets tools to rob a bank, and the police jump in, and you are both guilty. Does not matter if you actually went thru with it. Does not matter if you did not agree with him going to get those tools.


If Trump at any point agreed with others in a room, that they must stop or slow the electoral ballots count within the States. They must stop or slow Pence accepting or reading them. They must interrupt the counting and delay the proceeding. Then even if Trump never agreed to any specific action taken, he is still responsible for all actions taken to further that initial agreement.


it looks like evidence will be presented Trump was very directly involved in all of those areas, let alone one of them.
Click to expand...

That is the problem with Smith's case, he has to prove this beyond a reasonable doubt.
 
Tinkerpeach said:
That is the problem with Smith's case, he has to prove this beyond a reasonable doubt.
Click to expand...

Or it is the strength of Smith case if they have some of the reported evidence such as recordings of these discussions and writings of the plans along with witnesses who were 'in the room' as is being reported.

Yes prosecutors need to prove the elements of their case beyond a reasonable doubt, d'uh. Not sure why you think you are saying anything with that. It is always the case. Either they have the evidence or they do not and from reporting they have abundant evidence.
 
QP! said:
use your words.

Explain what exactly you 'find' interesting so when we shred your stupidity you do not just shift the goal posts.

Did you find it interesting that Trump won his seat in the 2016 GE he was claiming was rigged?
That he won the primaries leading up to 2016 that he claimed were rigged?


Any time Trump thinks he might potentially lose ANY election, he starts crying 'rigged', and yet many other people get elected, Trump included.

So what makes such a thing happening 'interesting'?
Click to expand...

it's also interesting the JPP fuckwits find it impossible to stay on topic....
 
QP! said:
Or it is the strength of Smith case if they have some of the reported evidence such as recordings of these discussions and writings of the plans along with witnesses who were 'in the room' as is being reported.

Yes prosecutors need to prove the elements of their case beyond a reasonable doubt, d'uh. Not sure why you think you are saying anything with that. It is always the case. Either they have the evidence or they do not and from reporting they have abundant evidence.
Click to expand...

lol.....you told us the same thing about Russian collusion and his tax returns.....why the fuck do you think anyone believes you this time.....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
it's also interesting the JPP fuckwits find it impossible to stay on topic....
Click to expand...

As expected. You are already starting the process of backpedaling away from your OP knowing it is stupid.

We are at the stage of you not being willing to own it and defend it by explaining it.
Soon you will claim to not have written it.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
lol.....you told us the same thing about Russian collusion and his tax returns.....why the fuck do you think anyone believes you this time.....
Click to expand...

Because we got a boat load of convictions proving Russian collusion and in-depth Senate committee report lead by Republicans also establishing it?

D'uh.

And from his tax returns we found things like his secret China bank accounts, he lied and said he never had amongst other damning stuff, such as him continuing to make money from his private businesses while in office in defiance of what he said and the law.

Again, d'uh.
 
floridafan said:
Ok, we have your opinion, but not a single fact that would stand up in court, proving once again how FOS you are. Now as to the "false" indictments, you haven't read a single one of them, which proves what an idiot your are.
Click to expand...

I've read those from Bragg and Smith.....which proves what an idiot YOU are.....
 
Jarod said:
You should read the indictment, that is not what she charged him for, in fact saying that is not a crime.

What are you saying was unconstitutional about the Georgia State election?
Click to expand...

the same thing I said the last six times you asked me that, fuckwit..,
 
QP! said:
As expected. You are already starting the process of backpedaling away from your OP knowing it is stupid.

We are at the stage of you not being willing to own it and defend it by explaining it.
Soon you will claim to not have written it.
Click to expand...

why do you think shoving things down your ass is backpedaling?.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top