Into the Night
Verified User
Yes, and this is not even close to extortion. You want to criminalize most statements.
Yes it is. You obviously don't know what extortion is.
Yes, and this is not even close to extortion. You want to criminalize most statements.
Why would any good American citizen interfere with law enforcement?
There was never any evidence to start.
Trump made up those claims, not me. They were easily proven false.
Yes it is. You obviously don't know what extortion is.
It's already been shown to you. Argument of the stone fallacy. You can't make the evidence go away by simply denying it either.
I am not talking about Trump, dumbass. You can't deny the evidence by making shit up either.
I know what it is, but you obviously don't know the elements of the law-none of which are met by this statement.
None of the supposed evidence had any validity and was easily proven false.
You are saying you don't believe any of the evidence Trump talked about? That's good because we all know it was a lie.
What did I make up?
Yes it is. You obviously don't know what extortion is.
Paradox. You can't make the evidence disappear by making a paradox or claiming some sort of so-called 'proof'. Denial of identity fallacy.
Sure I do. What elements of distortion are met by that statement?
There was never any evidence to begin with; therefore, there is nothing to disappear. The "evidence" was just made-up claims by Trump and others who couldn't accept losing. They knew his supporters would believe anything.
No, you apparently don't. RQAA.
You can't make the evidence disappear by making shit up, dude.
No, there was never a RQAA. You know you cannot find the required elements of extortion in the statement and pretend you already did by posting RQAA. It doesn't convince anybody.
Attempted proof by Stone.
Redefinition fallacy (extortion<->void).