BREAKING NEWS: Memo finally released!!!!!!!!

Rump is using a typical criminal trick, discredit the prosecution and any purveyor of the truth.
 
Simpson told the Committee that he had "no knowledge" of the dossier being peddled

but the author of the infamous Yahoo News article (Michael Isikoff) says Simpson was there when Steele leaked the dossier to him.



2k4m.jpg
 
Bourbon said:
... and Investigations are ended.

:babydance::yay:
Click to expand...

You're done faggot the coup plotting scum are exposed you fascist piece of shit:


3) Before and after Steele was terminated as a source, he maintained contact with DOJ via then-Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr, a senior DOJ official who worked closely with Deputy Attorneys General Yates and later Rosenstein. Shortly after the election, the FBI began interviewing Ohr, documenting his communications with Steele. For example, in September 2016, Steele admitted to Ohr his feelings against then-candidate Trump when Steele said he “was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not, being president.” This clear evidence of Steele’s bias was recorded by Ohr at the time and subsequently in official FBI files— but not reflected in any of the Page FISA applications.

a) During this same time period, Ohr’s wife was employed by Fusion GPS to assist in the cultivation of opposition research on Trump. Ohr later provided the FBI with all of his wife’s opposition research, paid for by the DNC and Clinton campaign via Fusion GPS. The Ohrs’ relationship with Steele and Fusion GPS was inexplicably concealed from the FISC.


Furthermore, Deputy Director McCabe testified before the Committee in December 2017 that no surveillance warrant would have been sought from the FISC without the Steele dossier information.

AND:

1) The “dossier” compiled by Christopher Steele (Steele dossier) on behalf of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Hillary Clinton campaign formed an essential part of the Carter Page FISA application. Steele was a longtime FBI source who was paid over $160,000 by the DNC and Clinton campaign, via the law firm Perkins Coie and research firm Fusion GPS, to obtain derogatory information on Donald Trump’s ties to Russia.



AND:

4) According to the head of the counterintelligence division, Assistant Director Bill Priestap, corroboration of the Steele dossier was in its “infancy” at the time of the initial Page FISA application. After Steele was terminated, a source validation report conducted by an independent unit within FBI assessed Steele’s reporting as only minimally corroborated. Yet, in early January 2017, Director Comey briefed President-elect Trump on a summary of the Steele dossier, even though it was—according to his June 2017 testimony—“salacious and unverified.” While the FISA application relied on Steele’s past record of credible reporting on other unrelated matters, it ignored or concealed his anti-Trump financial and ideological motivations.

a) Neither the initial application in October 2016, nor any of the renewals, disclose or reference the role of the DNC, Clinton campaign, or any party/campaign in funding Steele’s efforts, even though the political origins of the Steele dossier were then known to senior DOJ and FBI officials.


That's a wrap.
 
PraiseKek said:
Fruit from a poison tree doctrine you laughable fake ass lawyer.
Click to expand...

FOPT has to do with the veracity of the info, not the motavation of who collects it!

Unless the constitution was violated in the collection, but motivations dont violate constitutionality.
 
J Craft said:
It would be judicial malfeasance for a judge to give a warrant on politically motivated research.
Click to expand...

Depends on the veracity of the info and if anyone’s constitutional rights were violated in its collection.


Fools!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top