BREAKING NEWS: Memo finally released!!!!!!!!

Rep. Jerry Nadler of New York, one of the small number of lawmakers who has viewed the highly sensitive documents that are the basis of Nunes’ memo.

So they're biased and issued a memo to attempt to discredit the memo, by saying the Judge knew what was what. :good4u:
 
Fruit from a poison tree doctrine you laughable fake ass lawyer.

A Judge doesn't ask for the incidentals, before issuing such a warrant.
What he does do, is have the ones asking for such a warrant to swear that they information they're using is factual.
 
So they're biased and issued a memo to attempt to discredit the memo, by saying the Judge knew what was what.

Jerrold Lewis Nadler is an American attorney and politician who serves as the U.S. Representative from New York's 10th congressional district. He is a member of the DEMOCRAT Party.

Nadler has a liberal voting record in the House. He gained national prominence during the impeachment of Bill Clinton, when he described the process as a "partisan railroad job."

According to the National Journal, Nadler is one of seven members of the House of Representatives who tie for most liberal.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerrold_Nadler
 
Jerrold Lewis Nadler is an American attorney and politician who serves as the U.S. Representative from New York's 10th congressional district. He is a member of the DEMOCRAT Party.

Nadler has a liberal voting record in the House. He gained national prominence during the impeachment of Bill Clinton, when he described the process as a "partisan railroad job."

According to the National Journal, Nadler is one of seven members of the House of Representatives who tie for most liberal.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerrold_Nadler

Like a said; So they're biased and issued a memo to attempt to discredit the memo, by saying the Judge knew what was what
 
A Judge doesn't ask for the incidentals, before issuing such a warrant.
What he does do, is have the ones asking for such a warrant to swear that they information they're using is factual.

Looks like Flynn, Manafort, Gates, and Papadopoulos will be home free once they have their attorneys notify the judge of these illegal shenanigans.
 
Where was the lack of candor?

The court was not told why the dossier was compiled, namely as opposition research in a political race. That it's author was fired for breech of ethics, and finally that it had not been verified. That the Yahoo news article used as a separate source was from the same author as the dossier.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top