How can anyone do an effective cost analysis on the wall when no one can put a firm number on how many people are coming across lol?
Is that the kind of question only a Trumper would ask?
Poor Christiecrite, lol.
How can anyone do an effective cost analysis on the wall when no one can put a firm number on how many people are coming across lol?
Is that the kind of question only a Trumper would ask?
How can anyone do an effective cost analysis on the wall when no one can put a firm number on how many people are coming across lol?
Is that the kind of question only a Trumper would ask?
Poor Christiecrite, lol.
All right leggiecrite, enough of your sass.
Say the wall costs 12 billion and the first year 1.2 million illegals are apprehended, then the 2nd year 1 million, the third year 875000 etc. At what point does the cost and upkeep of the wall exceed the cost of apprehending, detaining and deporting illegals?
Let's find out, lol.
Let's not and say we did, lol.
Sounds like something a CYO girl would say, lol.
Good lord how does he, I mean, what does he know about Catholic girls lol?
I'm having trouble explaining this lol so bear with me.
If a wall really works and fewer and fewer make it across, wouldn't the cost be proven excessive over time compared to the number apprehended?
Say the wall costs 12 billion and the first year 1.2 million illegals are apprehended, then the 2nd year 1 million, the third year 875000 etc. At what point does the cost and upkeep of the wall exceed the cost of apprehending, detaining and deporting illegals?
Not what I was talking about. The claim on the table is that Cher said people should take illegals into their homes.I know. She didn't say not to take them into the city, but that the city was already doing a poor job in dealing with the current homeless population.
If one of those illegals (non-citizens) was going to murder one of your family members, I would imagine that you would not think that the cost was excessive.I'm having trouble explaining this lol so bear with me.
If a wall really works and fewer and fewer make it across, wouldn't the cost be proven excessive over time compared to the number apprehended?
Say the wall costs 12 billion and the first year 1.2 million illegals are apprehended, then the 2nd year 1 million, the third year 875000 etc. At what point does the cost and upkeep of the wall exceed the cost of apprehending, detaining and deporting illegals?
I'm having trouble explaining this lol so bear with me.
If a wall really works and fewer and fewer make it across, wouldn't the cost be proven excessive over time compared to the number apprehended?
Say the wall costs 12 billion and the first year 1.2 million illegals are apprehended, then the 2nd year 1 million, the third year 875000 etc. At what point does the cost and upkeep of the wall exceed the cost of apprehending, detaining and deporting illegals?
If one of those illegals (non-citizens) was going to murder one of your family members, I would imagine that you would not think that the cost was excessive.
Google "illegal crimes."
Not what I was talking about. The claim on the table is that Cher said people should take illegals into their homes.
First off, your premise that ‘walls don’t work’ is counterintuitive, at minimum. The most notable wall in present time is In Israel and it works pretty well.
Secondly, there’s a whole host of costs associated with illegal immigration that you ignored. The wall would cut down on the number of border workers, their healthcare costs, their pensions and etc. Once the wall is built the only further cost is upkeep.
I don't pay attention to fortune tellers. My family is less likely to be murdered by a non-citizen than by Joe Schmo down the street.
Total criminal convictions by type, 2016-2019
Homicide, manslaughter
FY16 - 8; FY17 - 3; F Y18 - 3 FY19 (to date) - 0
https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/cbp-enforcement-statistics/criminal-alien-statistics