There was no crime...
yes, there was. It was a financial crime, which was just business as usual for the thief in chief.
There was no crime...
Same idiocy over and over again,
he broke the law,
he received an advantage others did not, you do the crime, you pay the fine, basic tenet of all law
If you get a speeding tickets tell the Judge you don’t deserve to suffer any consequences cause there were “no victims, no claimants”
yes, there was. It was a financial crime, which was just business as usual for the thief in chief.
Plus he would pay a hefty interest on the bond, loses his appeal, and he owes even more
yes, there was. It was a financial crime, which was just business as usual for the thief in chief.
Hello.....KNOCK KNOCK, is there anything between your ears? This is about EXCESSIVE bail numbnuts.
This is a great question. You know the leftist mongrels don't give a shit about what's just.
Put it in reverse, you are saying that Trump has no consequences for his fraud until he and his army of attorneys completely exhaust the legal system, which we know in his case, could be years. Plus, he can meet the meet the judgement, even liquidating some of his assets, as those that he gain in advantage in obtaining via fraud
No, they're firmly in the Stalinist camp...
Truth Detector/Into the Night was let out of the mental asylum.
Back to his psychotic stalking again.
Who did he defraud? How much were they defrauded by? Let's say he does liquidate some assets. Will he get a good price or will they be sold at rock bottom prices because everybody knows he needs cash? If the later, then he is suffering harm by being forced to sell assets at below market value. Will the sale of these assets harm his future earning potential?
What happens if he is absolved of the charges on appeal? Does the state have to pay him back with interest the way he's being forced to pay them?
But, the question remains: Who was defrauded and by how much?
Same idiocy over and over again, he broke the law, he received an advantage others did not, you do the crime, you pay the fine, basic tenet of all law
If you get a speeding tickets tell the Judge you don’t deserve to suffer any consequences cause there were “no victims, no claimants”
He has to follow the rules just like everyone else.Which is a greater injustice? Trump having to put up the entire amount to appeal this ruling, or this amount keeping him from appealing this ruling?
He has to follow the rules just like everyone else.
The ruling, like the use of the law he was prosecuted under, are unprecedented exceptions. That doesn't change my question however.
Your question is how much more pure is Trump than Jesus.
You sound like Biden at to]
Which is a greater injustice? Trump having to put up the entire amount to appeal this ruling, or this amount keeping him from appealing this ruling?