"Democrats Don't Like Their Families"

There is definitely wrongness, but it's your skewed perception of a mythical utopian society that never existed. Until the 20th century, most Americans lived in rural, agricultural regions and seldom moved far from their birth places. Whether they had children or not, both parents worked and worked hard. Often *their* parents lived with them or nearby. The kids also worked and worked hard, hence the archaic school schedule we still follow with summers off. If they lived in cities, kids also worked. Hence child labor laws.

You might as well blame unions and labor law for giving us paid days off, weekends and holidays off, and 40-hour work weeks. People didn't have the leisure to obsess over social issues when they were working twice as many hours per week as we typically do now.
Every MAGA moron who pines for 'the good old days' would never actually trade living in 2024 to live in 1924.
 
the presence of hunter in and around the white house as often as he has been marks him as more than just a son visiting his parents.

let's be very clear, YOU democrats/liberals are the ones who began the 'clump of cells' argument, so if you need to be upset at someone about it, look in the mirror.

you at least have most of the hypocrisy of the right correct, but at least most of them still believe in the nuclear family and beneficial gender roles.
What does it make him?

You hate women.
 
That implies that MAGA morons see him as a fellow traveler and admire his ability to be unfaithful to all three of his wives with impunity.
Exactly. If a person repeatedly claims they admire and support a draft-dodging, adulterous, oath-breaking sexual predator, then they must feel a kinship with them.
 
You can holler as much as you want about the good old days, but you would turn down every opportunity given to you to trade your life in 2024 for one in 1924
No doubt you are correct. No many elderly Americans would trade their A/C, WiFi and streaming television for the hot and squalid conditions of 1924.
 
what have been the historical gender roles that have made societies successful for generations?
Successful for who? The patriarchy has been giving itself power for centuries at the expense of women. We have had war strife and unequal access to power. Men are not peaceful creatures. Look at all the childish threats you post.
 
No doubt you are correct. No many elderly Americans would trade their A/C, WiFi and streaming television for the hot and squalid conditions of 1924.
No modern conveniences, no labor or pension protections, rudimentary health care at best, no food safety inspections, widespread and socially acceptable racism, anti-Semitism, sexism.

I think MAGA morons would have to be dragged kicking and screaming away from their WiFi connection
 
Successful for who? The patriarchy has been giving itself power for centuries at the expense of women. We have had war strife and unequal access to power. Men are not peaceful creatures. Look at all the childish threats you post.
the patriarchy exists because of women.

men have NEVER been peaceful creatures, nor should they be.

are men and women the same? no, they are not.

what you consider inequality, exists for very good reasons.

you idiots claim I hate women, but that's because you refuse to acknowledge reality and are incapable of learning.
 
the patriarchy exists because of women.

men have NEVER been peaceful creatures, nor should they be.

are men and women the same? no, they are not.

what you consider inequality, exists for very good reasons.

you idiots claim I hate women, but that's because you refuse to acknowledge reality and are incapable of learning.
You accuse others of being blind and/or extreme but never admit that you are guilty of the same.

You and I both know there's a big difference between allowing a person to choose and for others to make that choice for them. You constantly accuse the Left of being authoritarian socialists yet you support a RW white male authoritarian state. You're no better than those you accuse, son.
 
Back
Top