Good thinking. An investigation isn’t validated by a party to the investigation not accepting it. Maybe validation requires the entire committee to reject it.
Democrats’ gaslighting takes a new and disturbing turn
- Thread starter Truth Detector
- Start date
LurchAddams
There Can be Only One!
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
Not at all for me. I'm anti-left, not pro-Trump.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
cheap fake poster......
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
this moron can't spell "you're a moron"..........he's also stupid enough to believe a lib'rul shouting "nuh-uh" equals a debunking.......As usual, the above poster ^ offers bullshit, and he can even find a meme that hasn’t been debunked to do it
Video edited to make it appear Biden tried to sit down when there wasn’t a chair
As World War II veterans and world leaders gathered to honor the famed Allied invasion of Nazi-occupied France, social media users shared the short clip to further an ongoing narrative that Biden is infirm.apnews.com
FACT FOCUS: Biden's pause as he left a star-studded LA fundraiser becomes a target for opponents
Members of Biden's campaign say the president stopped to take in cheers as he left a sit-down with former President Barack Obama and comedian Jimmy Kimmel.
Trump campaign seizes on misleading video to criticize Biden's mental state: Fact check
As Donald Trump turns 78, his campaign is trying to paint 2024 rival President Joe Biden as mentally incompetent by distorting a moment from the G7 summit.abcnews.go.com
Time now for the “your a moron” and alike rebuttals
LurchAddams
There Can be Only One!
All evidence to the contrary when you're constantly defending Trump. But nice try! I do believe you when you're say you're anti-left, though, you just can't accept that the side you're defending is racist, criminal, traitorous and all-around evil.
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
I don't "constantly defend Trump." I am anti-Biden and the Left. If given the choice between two incompetent evils, the one not on the Left is my choice. It's that simple. Biden is as, or more so, every negative Trump is and then some. Trump obviously had some success as a businessman, developer, and celebrity on television.
Biden has a 50 + year track record of being on the wrong side of every major US foreign policy decision, is a serial liar and plagiarist, is an overt racist, and basically is everything you don't want in a politician. Outside of that he has nothing...NOTHING.
Crepitus
Verified User
AProudLefty
Black Kitty Ain't Happy
You're the king of the kiddie table.
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
Nah, I'm the guy that got invited only to install the new sound and video system so everybody could be entertained. After that, I'm ushered off to the kitchen for my fill of food and beer but told not to disturb the guests...
LurchAddams
There Can be Only One!
Yes, you do. I hate to keep bringing this up but when I criticized trump not disclosing his tax returns, like every other candidate has in modern times, you lied and said that FOIA justified him withholding them. Now, the reason I can't forget that and that I knew immediately that was bullshit is that I was a government contractor for over a quarter century. I actually used FOIA to dig up information on the government. I know what FOIA is and how to use it. It's purpose is to obtain information NOT to withhold it. You picked the wrong guy to lie to about it. So please don't keep telling me you don't defend trump. You bend over backwards to defend trump even if you have to lie to do it.
Yes, I've acknowledged to you that I know that. You've mentioned that several times. You hate all Democrats. A Democrat could turn water into wine in front of you and you'd make up some story about how that was "the work of the devil".
Yes, I know. "Trump actually isn't a fraud, a criminal, a liar, and a danger to democracy and Biden is Satan". <-- I understand that's your "truth".
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
Defending him occasionally is not what I'd call "defending Trump." Defending Trump is those that see him doing no wrong, being infallible. I see neither in him. He is fallible and often wrong. You seemingly just can't stand that I'm more open minded and fair in my assessment of him than the TDS crowd where you can't find any good in Trump whatsoever.
I also don't hate all Democrats. I vote, usually down ticket, for some I know are worthwhile candidates.
As for Trump, he often talks smack and says crazy shit. He throws out half-truths like any other politician. He's a braggard and exaggerates his own record. That's par for the course for just about any politician.
Here in Arizona, I'm really not happy that Krystin Sinema decided to drop running but I guess she couldn't bring herself to do it as a Republican and couldn't do it as a Democrat. The choices for her seat, in a word, suck. Karri Lake is insane. Blake Masters is an empty suit, while the Democrat Ruben Gallego is a hard-core leftist. That leaves me with a sort of damned if I do, damned if I don't sort of choice.
Last edited:
You can't spell "liberal".
LurchAddams
There Can be Only One!
You also recently tried to invalidate the Senate investigation into Trump's contacts with the Russian because "one Senator didn't sign the report".
You invoke "Democrats being advocates of the KKK" because some were 100 years ago, while knowing full well it's the Republicans the KKK identifies with in the current day. When your arguments are that weak, it weakens your credibility.
I've never seen you attack Trump or do anything other than defend him. He's so much more than "fallible". He's taken a wrecking ball to America's institutions. He's the first president in history break the tradition of a peaceful transition of power. He and his family used his office to enrich themselves blatantly. You ignore that but accused Biden of taking bribes constantly even though all those claims have been debunked.
I'll take your word for that, but hope that you understand my skepticism, based on your posting history.
See - and there's where we'll never agree. There is no equivalency in the way Trump behaves versus any other politician, Democrat or Republican. No other politician in history has attacked his own country when losing an election. No other president in history has attacked created the chaos and drama that was the Trump administration.
Well, I'm sorry you feel that way. Minor disagreement on Kari Lake - I don't think she's insane. I think she's just mimicking Trump's behavior for political gain. Insane people aren't responsible for their actions. Lake knows exactly what she's doing.
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
Actually, today's KKK is insignificant, tiny in numbers, and doesn't identify with either party.
Sure I have. I regularly call him a braggard and bloviator. He talks a lot of smack and hyperbole. His knowledge on things technical and scientific is weak leading to him saying stupid stuff on those subjects.
On using public office to enrich one's self...
I doubt that Trump is richer or even better off for having chosen to run for president. I don't think you can demonstrate that he's gotten wealthy off of it.
On the other hand, Biden is a multi-millionaire who has done nothing but serve in public office. He certainly didn't get there by way of his paychecks. I'd also say that there is more than sufficient evidence that Biden is up to his eyeballs in corrupt money dealings.
I've even gone to local events that are greet and meet for Democrat candidates. In one case, they had an advocate for Prop 127 a few years back here. That was bill to force the state into solar (in particular) along with wind and would have ended most fossil fuel energy production. After her spiel, I went up and politely told her that her positions were wrong and could prove it. She gave me the head loll, rolling her eyes.
I caught that instantly, and said, "I politely listened to everything you said, and took it seriously. I wanted to engage you in a serious discussion on this issue as it is important to me. When I disagree with you, you roll you eyes and give me that 'Here we go again' look disrespecting me. It's clear you don't want to engage in any meaningful debate or conversation over this issue, you just want people to agree with you without thinking..."
That got made her a combination of embarrassed for being caught, and angry that I'd point it out. It was one more reason I had to vote down that proposition.
At the same meet and greet there was a lawyer (and I really despise lawyers) wanting to be elected to the CAP board. She was impressive. Knew her shit and was competent. Listened to questions and gave great answers. I voted for her.
You'd be wrong, and by a long shot wrong.
A history of contested presidential elections, from Samuel Tilden to Al Gore
The elections of 1876, 1888, 1960 and 2000 were among the most contentious in American history.
theconversation.com
8 Most Contentious US Presidential Elections | HISTORY
These presidential elections brought out the wild side in our nation’s democratic process.
www.history.com
/https%3A%2F%2Ftf-cmsv2-smithsonianmag-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Ffiler%2F3f%2F7f%2F3f7f0777-91bd-4113-ac29-20fe0ecc5450%2Fqtzvvdnd-1478014367-wr.jpg)
Four Times the Results of a Presidential Election Were Contested
"Rigged" may not be the way to describe them, but there were definitely some shenanigans happening
www.smithsonianmag.com
1876 was probably the worst, and far, far worse than 2016 or 2020.
No, at this point, she's insane. One good indicator of that is she keeps going to court over election fraud even as she gets her cases tossed for lack of standing, and shot down for being poorly organized. She keeps doing the same thing over and over expecting different results.
Into the Night
Verified User
LIF. Grow up.
moon
Satire for Sanity
You can talk, you juvenile half-wit,
Haw, haw...........................................haw.
Into the Night
Verified User
You're STILL trying to push the so-called 'Russia, Russia, Russia'?????!?
A picture of yourself is not the Trump indoctrinated.
Into the Night
Verified User
LIF. Grow up.
Into the Night
Verified User
Attempted force of negative proof fallacy.