It would ruin their theory.
First Annual Fake News Awards
- Thread starter dukkha
- Start date
The cretinous parrots NEVER fail to provide!
The SAME WORDS over and over and over.
Uranium One
Nothing Burger
Triggered
Collusion
Fake News
Deep state
MAGA
Witch hunt
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
You mean the emails about trying to make sure Hillary gets elected?
Althea
Althea told me...........
First time I mentioned it to Annoise on FB, he said...unbelievably...'I haven't seen anything about that'.
Maybe you need to look at other sites than Infowars for your information?
The illiterate fuck can’t even get the name of the Democratic Party correct.
Althea
Althea told me...........
Yea. Sure. Those
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
You keep adding new words to your supposed "same words", moron.
And your one trick post is boring.
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
That's what I thought Hillary lover.
Did Grind give you the name of the women? Why are you avoiding this question?
Althea
Althea told me...........
Swing and a miss. Keep your eye on the ball.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
My problem with it is with the witch hunt aspect. And the fact everything is so Trump-o-centric when there was EASILY more suspicious activity with the FISA court and within the IC more generally—than is of Trump colluding with Russians.
And no, I don’t buy the ‘we Don’t know what Mueller knows’ bit. The way the IC has leaked if Trump was guilty—we’d all know it by now.
We’d known it last year, in fact. Mueller is clearly fishing. ‘Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime’ is the old Soviet mantra.
How ironic is that.
I sure don’t, moron.
And I realize this is going over your head, dumbfuck, but that SAME LIST identifies one trick ponies. You included, lemming.
FOOLISS.
So, you are afraid he is guilty. Thanks
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
Honestly, this was another one of those things that I thought, "Surely, they won't defend this." Not that it was a big deal, but I thought most on the right would leave it alone.
Instead, we see them going to the lengths they have on this thread - arguing vehemently that opinion pieces and personal tweets are hard news, claiming that economics is an exact and 100% predictable science, and in general praising this kind of immature behavior out of a world leader.
It really does make me kind of sad. I voted for Obama in 2008, but was disappointed with many things that he did, and didn't hesitate to talk about that on JPP. I just don't understand the mode of defending every little thing, just because you voted for a guy.
Instead, we see them going to the lengths they have on this thread - arguing vehemently that opinion pieces and personal tweets are hard news, claiming that economics is an exact and 100% predictable science, and in general praising this kind of immature behavior out of a world leader.
It really does make me kind of sad. I voted for Obama in 2008, but was disappointed with many things that he did, and didn't hesitate to talk about that on JPP. I just don't understand the mode of defending every little thing, just because you voted for a guy.
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
Post a previous list with witch hunt on it.
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
I see the meds kicked in. I'm relieved for you little buddy.
I asked you politely to stop responding to me. Are you unable to do that?
And I'd also ask that you stop calling me little buddy. It's just strange.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
He's being polite, I'd call you far worse than that.
Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk