For you idiots, the alleged crimes!

[Jarod]

He gave them verbally as is required by law in NYS and at any point the jury can ask to have them read or clarified for them again.

And they did.

 

[Yakuda]

Actions are usually used to prove intent, so yes, the actions of a known liar named trump.

And Cohen? Still nothing but an opinion.

 

[Lionfish]

And they did.

Leave your reception desk and go back and ask a lawyer for a link to your declaration that it is against NY law for a judge to give written instructions to a jury. Asking for a friend named Megyn Kelly and a handful of other litigators who seem to disagree with you.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Link?

The instructions from that corrupt cunt Merchan are simple: "Find Trump Guilty. Pay no attention to the law. Regardless of any doubt you have, no matter how reasonable, find Trump guilty."

It is a lynching - pure and simple. Will it work? Will all 12 jurors go along with this rape of the rule of law? I doubt it. All it takes is one who worries that they or their loved ones could be lynched in the same manner to derail this murder of the rule of law.

 

[Yakuda]

Even Cohen never said what the intended "crime" was. To pay an NDA? That's perfectly legal and Stalinists do it every single day.

To "influence" then election lol

 

[Uncensored2008]

Sure, she testified that Trump is a micromanager and would never pay anyone over $400,000 dollars for attorney fees without evidence that the work was performed.

That's nice - yet nothing in there is a crime.

So again - you agree that there is no underlying crime and this is a lynching by the third world thugs in New York.

 

[Walt]

And Cohen? Still nothing but an opinion.

Intent is inferred from actions. trump would generally want to present another explanation for his actions in court, but he could not because he does not admit his actions.

 

[Jarod]

That's nice - yet nothing in there is a crime.

So again - you agree that there is no underlying crime and this is a lynching by the third world thugs in New York.

falsifying business records is against the law in NY.

 

[Jarod]

Leave your reception desk and go back and ask a lawyer for a link to your declaration that it is against NY law for a judge to give written instructions to a jury. Asking for a friend named Megyn Kelly and a handful of other litigators who seem to disagree with you.

People v. Johnson, 81 N.Y.2d 980, 982(1993); People v. Owens, 69 N.Y.2d 585, 591–592 (1987).

It appears there are some rare incidences where it can be done in criminal cases, but above is the law and nuances that made it improper in this case.

 

[Into the Night]

Part of Merchan's hours long instructions (which they cannot see a written version of) were that the jury could decide what crime(s) Trump committed to make the charges rise to a felony, and they didn't have to agree on those so long as they all decided he committed them...

Lynchings are more kind to the defendant. At least they're up front about what's coming...

The judge just broke the law AGAIN.

 

[Jarod]

The judge just broke the law AGAIN.

People v. Johnson, 81 N.Y.2d 980, 982(1993); People v. Owens, 69 N.Y.2d 585, 591–592 (1987).

 

[Into the Night]

Finally what i have been hammering in to the stupid Terry's head, sticks after i quote it to him 10 times.

it parallels EXACTLY my misdemeanor Trespassing to Felony Trespassing example.

Congrats, man.

But you still get it wrong. The Jury can SEE the jury instructions. They can read them. They just cannot take them in to the deliberation room with them.

And this is the normal application of NYS law, but just as you guys did with the Letisha James case, acting as if a 'Bread and Butter' documents fraud case was something novel and new and never done before Trump, you were wrong (and stupid) then, just as you are wrong (and stupid) now.

False equivalence fallacy. Breaking the law is not following the law. The judge has now broken the law several times. So has the prosecutor. The instructions are themselves illegal.

 

[Into the Night]

Nope, that’s not what he said. But, then again, you’re stupid.

You cannot deny any post that has been made, Dumber.

 

[Into the Night]

What's the evidence for intent? A known liar?

That's not even evidence of intent.

 

[Into the Night]

Hope Hicks testimony and the testimony of Trumps former personal assistant for a start. Are you not paying attention?

Nope. A testimony is not intent or is a specification. Specification?

 

[Into the Night]

falsifying business records is against the law in NY.

No, it isn't. There must be intent to cover up some other crime. What is the crime?

 

[Uncensored2008]

And they did.

The presiding cunt, Merchan, told the jury to find guilt regardless of the law.

It is both unethical and criminal.

The presiding cunt in this lynching is no different than some bubba in Alabama in 1920 trying a black man for raping a white woman. Facts and evidence are irrelevant - the "defendant" is a target - there is no pretense of actual law.

Cunt Merchan is safely in the third world Junta of New York and feels immune to any authority other than the party. He clearly has contempt for the rule of law. An honest AG this coming January might teach him differently.

 

[Into the Night]

People v. Johnson, 81 N.Y.2d 980, 982(1993); People v. Owens, 69 N.Y.2d 585, 591–592 (1987).

Why are you quoting some random unrelated case?

 

[Uncensored2008]

To "influence" then election lol

LOL

That is EXACTLY what they are lynching Trump for, having the temerity to oppose them in an election.

 

[Into the Night]

People v. Johnson, 81 N.Y.2d 980, 982(1993); People v. Owens, 69 N.Y.2d 585, 591–592 (1987).

It appears there are some rare incidences where it can be done in criminal cases, but above is the law and nuances that made it improper in this case.

Unrelated case. Why are you quoting an unrelated case?