C
Cancel3
Guest
I have found that you typically assume that I am saying something that I have not.
If you use force, intimidation and punishment judiciously in his younger years, you will have to use less when he grows older. Eventually you ween them off of your guidance altogether, or you have failed and he becomes a loser, or worse, society has to take over with threats, intimidation and punishment.
LMAO Well I have found you change direction, refuse to answer questions, and throw out very vague statements. But I keep trying to understand what the hell you mean anyway.
So when you said "I believe that most young man will not meet their full potential unless he is steered in the right direction, and will use force and intimidation when necessary, for his own good.", you meant that in terms of his younger years? Considering that very few people consider a small child a "young man", I am sure you can see why I misunderstood what you meant.