Godsmack.Tool.
Tool.
wow... another brilliant response....
Nothing on the censorship? Why is that Dung? Because your side seems to relish in painting Palin as a book burner, when that is blatantly false. Yet when the beloved Dems censor a movie.... not a peep.
Imagine that.
Can you provide a list of books that she supposedly wanted to ban that is not already debunked by factcheck.org or are you just repeating this because you like to hear the echo of your keyboard when you type?If you want to compare the Vice Presidential nominee's book banning to the "censorship" of "Hollywood" that's just fine by me. But, that makes you a tool.
If you want to compare the Vice Presidential nominee's book banning to the "censorship" of "Hollywood" that's just fine by me. But, that makes you a tool.
Black Sabbath, Led Zepplin and Pink FloydGodsmack.
Can you provide a list of books that she supposedly wanted to ban that is not already debunked by factcheck.org or are you just repeating this because you like to hear the echo of your keyboard when you type?
One thing that I know, it isn't when no books at all were banned.I love it when conservatives don't have a clue what 'censorship' is.
A band. So is "Tool".Who is godsmack ?
One thing that I know, it isn't when no books at all were banned.
It would significantly depend on the context. Since I am not the DA or something it wouldn't be quite the hypothetical that it would be if I were say a Governor thinking about a problem that may come in the future asking the DA such a "what if".such incredible blind hackery.
the intent is the issue.
So I suppose if Damo ran around asking how do I have sex with a 3 yr old it would be fine as long as he did not actually have sex with a 3 yr old ?
It would significantly depend on the context. Since I am not the DA or something it wouldn't be quite the hypothetical that it would be if I were say a Governor thinking about a problem that may come in the future asking the DA such a "what if".
The fact is you have your assumption of intent, nothing more or less than that.
Again, I do know that censorship didn't happen and all the attempts to read intent into a conversation you weren't there for is just that, an attempt to read intent.
For a person who can't believe that people read body language I am amazed at how you can suddenly assume intent from a conversation you didn't participate in.
It would significantly depend on the context. Since I am not the DA or something it wouldn't be quite the hypothetical that it would be if I were say a Governor thinking about a problem that may come in the future asking the DA such a "what if".
The fact is you have your assumption of intent, nothing more or less than that.
Again, I do know that censorship didn't happen and all the attempts to read intent into a conversation you weren't there for is just that, an attempt to read intent.
For a person who can't believe that people read body language I am amazed at how you can suddenly assume intent from a conversation you didn't participate in.