HAHAHA. Caitlin Clark joins the WNBA. Will make measly $76,000 a year.

T

Text Drivers are Killers

Biden likes little girls
Feminists are screaming about how UNFAIR this is but if she wants NBA money let her qualify for the NBA. Fact is she can't dunk or even shoot a jump shot. She couldn't play on an average boy's HS team. The WNBA is an extremely minor league. BTW - clark looks very mannish, same as britney griner. Is the WNBA a fraud?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nb...S&cvid=29d0b74fc16145d2fc80936eb2a270e5&ei=27

apr 18 2024 It's official: Former Iowa women's basketball star Caitlin Clark is off to the WNBA, as the NCAA's all-time scoring leader was selected No. 1 overall by the Indiana Fever in Monday's WNBA draft.

Clark, the game's brightest star, already was reportedly among the top earners in all of college sports with various NIL deals. She will still make lots of money on her sponsorships as she joins the WNBA. Her sponsorships include State Farm, Gatorade, Nike, Xfinity, H&R Block, and Panini America among others. Clark also already has a regional sponsor in the Indianapolis area. She signed a deal with Gainbridge, an insurance and annuity company.

The first four picks of the WNBA draft are each slotted at the same value, meaning Clark, Brink, Cardoso and Jackson will each receive the same amount of money. Here's the year-by-year breakdown of Clark's contract (it has not been announced if she has signed):

2024: $76,535
2025: $78,066
2026: $85,873
2027 (fourth-year option): $97,582
Click to expand...
 
She's a great player, and the influx of her & other college stars this year will greatly increase the WNBA's popularity. As evidenced by the huge increase in ratings for the NCAA women this year.

This is a very odd thread, and seems misogynistic.
 
BartenderElite said:
She's a great player, and the influx of her & other college stars this year will greatly increase the WNBA's popularity. As evidenced by the huge increase in ratings for the NCAA women this year.

This is a very odd thread, and seems misogynistic.
Click to expand...

Everything by TDAK is very odd and hate filled.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
Feminists are screaming about how UNFAIR this is but if she wants NBA money let her qualify for the NBA. Fact is she can't dunk or even shoot a jump shot. She couldn't play on an average boy's HS team. The WNBA is an extremely minor league. BTW - clark looks very mannish, same as britney griner. Is the WNBA a fraud?
Click to expand...

Sports leagues like the WNBA give women a chance to play.
They don't make serious [if any] money, so that can't pay serious money.

Except for tennis and golf and maybe MMA, very few people pay to watch women's pro sports.
The fact that these leagues exist is fortunate for those who want to play
and not something that those of us who don't care to watch
need to disparage.

TDAK is a racist and a misogynist who vents on the internet.
He doesn't care how stupid he looks doing it, obviously.
He gets it off his chest and feels better.
Isn't that really why we're here?
 
BartenderElite said:
She's a great player, and the influx of her & other college stars this year will greatly increase the WNBA's popularity. As evidenced by the huge increase in ratings for the NCAA women this year.

This is a very odd thread, and seems misogynistic.
Click to expand...

Great player?? HAHAHAHA. So why doesn't she join the NBA and make 20 mill a year.
 
BartenderElite said:
She's a great player, and the influx of her & other college stars this year will greatly increase the WNBA's popularity. As evidenced by the huge increase in ratings for the NCAA women this year.

This is a very odd thread, and seems misogynistic.
Click to expand...
He hates women, his posts over the years are very racist and very misogynistic.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
HAHAHAHA. Hear that everybody.? This nut supports affirmative action and wants special treatment for blacks and women and then calls me racist and sexist!!!
Click to expand...

Logic isn't your strong point, TDAK.

Even if a person is wrong in his/her belief in special treatment,
that in no way prevents him/her/it from seeing the obvious--
you ARE a racist and sexist.

Both WOKE hippies and discriminating people couldn't help but see it.

Meanwhile, quote any posts of mine that promote affirmative action or special treatment.
I've always felt that color blindness was the only approach to racial equity.
You just pull things out of your ass.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
Feminists are screaming about how UNFAIR this is but if she wants NBA money let her qualify for the NBA. Fact is she can't dunk or even shoot a jump shot. She couldn't play on an average boy's HS team. The WNBA is an extremely minor league. BTW - clark looks very mannish, same as britney griner. Is the WNBA a fraud?
Click to expand...

Hey, trumptard. First of all her salary is only a fraction of her earnings. Her endorsements will net her millions.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/sports...ry-male-counterparts-draws-outrage-rcna148024

“Caitlin Clark stands to make a half million dollars or more in WNBA earnings this coming season, in addition to what she will receive through endorsements and other partnerships, which has been reported to already exceed $3 million," the league spokesperson said.
Click to expand...

You're still butthurt that the NCAA Women's final set the record for the most watched basketball game ever, aren't you?

We can't help you!

https://www.npr.org/2024/04/10/1243...e, between South,the men's, according to ESPN.

The final game, between South Carolina's Gamecocks and the University of Iowa's Hawkeyes, averaged about 18.7 million viewers and peaked at a whopping 24 million combined on ESPN and ABC, making it the first time in history that a women's final has drawn a larger TV audience than the men's, according to ESPN.
Click to expand...
 
BartenderElite said:
She's a great player, and the influx of her & other college stars this year will greatly increase the WNBA's popularity. As evidenced by the huge increase in ratings for the NCAA women this year.

This is a very odd thread, and seems misogynistic.
Click to expand...

How is it misogynistic when its quite clear that this Clark and Griner are really men? Throw in michele obama as well for being a man.
Is there a WOKE club that these liberals here belong to, or are they simply on board with a Cancel Culture, CRT and a sexual bastardization
of our youthful school students?
 
Last edited:
LurchAddams said:
Hey, trumptard. First of all her salary is only a fraction of her earnings. Her endorsements will net her millions.

You're still butthurt that the NCAA Women's final set the record for the most watched basketball game ever, aren't you?
Click to expand...
We're not talking endorsement money, you moron.

The woman's final was NOT the most watched basketball game ever. Show us your evidence for that preposterous claim. NBC says so is not evidence.
 
Not my beliefs, but reality bites,

The WNBA women are asking for the same % of revenue sharing as the NBA men.

There are 12 players per team

There are 12 teams which means there are 144 players.

The WNBA loses roughly $12,000,000 per year

$12,000,000 divided by 144 players = each player owing $83,000.33

_1a1%20-%20Copy%20(2a).gif
 
Lionfish said:
Not my beliefs, but reality bites,

The WNBA women are asking for the same % of revenue sharing as the NBA men.

There are 12 players per team

There are 12 teams which means there are 144 players.

The WNBA loses roughly $12,000,000 per year

$12,000,000 divided by 144 players = each player owing $83,000.33

_1a1%20-%20Copy%20(2a).gif
Click to expand...

Which raises the question, how can the league stay in business.? Answer - taxpayer subsidies.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top