hey cowgirl lets discuss elections

evince said:
you are a liar



http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...signed-to-work&p=1523979&posted=1#post1523979




Quote Originally Posted by Sentistar View Post

Unfortunately Obama has opened a Pandora's box. While the Republicans piss and moan about Obama's "pen", should they gain the presidency they will do the exact same thing Obama is doing now. The voters are the real idiots because each and every election they vote and allow the government to take more and more power. This is both the Democrats and Republicans.
Click to expand...

live with what you said liar
 
Sentistar said:
Nope you haven't. Still waiting for you to prove you aren't a child molester. I will not communicate with child molesters like yourself.
Click to expand...

so again you just pretend all those court documents I gave you don't exist?


wow he lying you will do for the republican party
 
evince said:
http://www.scotusblog.com/2013/01/gop-request-denied/





GOP ballot challenge request denied (UPDATED)





Final update 11:41 am

The Supreme Court on Monday turned down a plea by the national Republican Party to free it from a three-decades-old court order that limits its right to challenge voters’ qualifications. The Republican National Committee had argued that it has obeyed the order diligently and thus it should be lifted; the Democratic National Committee said that violations continue. The case was Republican National Committee v. Democratic National Committee (12-373). The Justices offered no explanation, as usual, for denying review. The order list is here.
Click to expand...

this
 
Today, 07:36 AM
#320 | Top


evince's Avatar

evince











evince is online now
Truthmatters



Join Date:Jul 2006Posts:45,862Thanks:4,257Thanked 6,393 Times in 4,912 Posts Groans:0 Groaned 3,579 Times in 3,243 Posts


Default








Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post

http://deadstate.org/new-york-times-...f-voter-fraud/



New York Times: In spite of 5-year Bush Admin. investigation, DOJ found virtually no evidence of voter fraud

posted by DeadState August 20, 2013
this

http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2007/2007-190.htm


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/27/bu...in&oref=slogin


S.E.C. Concedes Oversight Flaws Fueled Collapse


Edit / Delete Edit Post Quick reply to this message Reply Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Blog this Post .

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------






Today, 07:37 AM
#321 | Top


evince's Avatar

evince











evince is online now
Truthmatters



Join Date:Jul 2006Posts:45,862Thanks:4,257Thanked 6,393 Times in 4,912 Posts Groans:0 Groaned 3,579 Times in 3,243 Posts


Default








Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010...spanic-ad.html


Nevada Ad Urging Latinos 'Don't Vote' Is Pulled


Published October 19, 2010
·


this is who the republican party is
this

http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2007/2007-190.htm


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/27/bu...in&oref=slogin


S.E.C. Concedes Oversight Flaws Fueled Collapse


Edit / Delete Edit Post Quick reply to this message Reply Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Blog this Post .

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------






Today, 07:38 AM
#322 | Top


evince's Avatar

evince











evince is online now
Truthmatters



Join Date:Jul 2006Posts:45,862Thanks:4,257Thanked 6,393 Times in 4,912 Posts Groans:0 Groaned 3,579 Times in 3,243 Posts


Default








Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post

http://articles.latimes.com/1986-10-...onal-committee



In an Aug. 13 memo the court made public Friday, Kris Wolfe, the Republican National Committee Midwest political director, wrote Lanny Griffith, the committee's Southern political director, and said of the Louisiana campaigning:

"I know this race is really important to you. I would guess that this program will eliminate at least 60-80,000 folks from the rolls. . . . If it's a close race . . . which I'm assuming it is, this could keep the black vote down considerably."
this

http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2007/2007-190.htm


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/27/bu...in&oref=slogin


S.E.C. Concedes Oversight Flaws Fueled Collapse


Edit / Delete Edit Post Quick reply to this message Reply Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Blog this Post .

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------






Today, 07:38 AM
#323 | Top


evince's Avatar

evince











evince is online now
Truthmatters



Join Date:Jul 2006Posts:45,862Thanks:4,257Thanked 6,393 Times in 4,912 Posts Groans:0 Groaned 3,579 Times in 3,243 Posts


Default








Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post

http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan...fraud-20130114



WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has refused to lift a 30-year consent decree that bars the Republican National Committee from targeting racial and ethnic minorities in its efforts to end fraudulent voting.

The justices without comment turned down an appeal from RNC lawyers who said the decree has become “antiquated” and is “increasingly used as political weapon” by Democrats during national campaigns.

For their part, lawyers for the Democratic National Committee had argued that recent campaigns show the “consent degree remains necessary today.”

The court’s action is a victory for the DNC, and it comes after an election year in which the two parties regularly exchanged charges over “voter fraud” and “voter intimidation.” But most of the recent battles have been fought on the state level, and it is not clear whether the long-standing consent decree has had much impact.
this

http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2007/2007-190.htm


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/27/bu...in&oref=slogin


S.E.C. Concedes Oversight Flaws Fueled Collapse


Edit / Delete Edit Post Quick reply to this message Reply Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Blog this Post .

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------






Today, 07:40 AM
#324 | Top


evince's Avatar

evince











evince is online now
Truthmatters



Join Date:Jul 2006Posts:45,862Thanks:4,257Thanked 6,393 Times in 4,912 Posts Groans:0 Groaned 3,579 Times in 3,243 Posts


Default








Quote Originally Posted by Rana View Post

Voter fraud is a non issue

Out of the 197 million votes cast for federal candidates between 2002 and 2005, only 40 voters were indicted for voter fraud. Only 26 of those cases, or about .00000013 percent of the votes cast, resulted in convictions or guilty pleas.

http://voterfraudfacts.com/

this

http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2007/2007-190.htm


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/27/bu...in&oref=slogin


S.E.C. Concedes Oversight Flaws Fueled Collapse


Edit / Delete Edit Post Quick reply to this message Reply Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Blog this Post .

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------






Today, 07:42 AM
#325 | Top


evince's Avatar

evince











evince is online now
Truthmatters



Join Date:Jul 2006Posts:45,862Thanks:4,257Thanked 6,393 Times in 4,912 Posts Groans:0 Groaned 3,579 Times in 3,243 Posts


Default








Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post

http://www.brennancenter.org/publica...ut-voter-fraud


Brennan Justiced Center


this is a law school name after a supreme court member of the past.


the list of cases documented in our court system of republicans cheating Americans out of heir rights to vote is extensive and fully documented
this

http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2007/2007-190.htm


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/27/bu...in&oref=slogin


S.E.C. Concedes Oversight Flaws Fueled Collapse


Edit / Delete Edit Post Quick reply to this message Reply Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Blog this Post .

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------






Today, 07:42 AM
#326 | Top


evince's Avatar

evince











evince is online now
Truthmatters



Join Date:Jul 2006Posts:45,862Thanks:4,257Thanked 6,393 Times in 4,912 Posts Groans:0 Groaned 3,579 Times in 3,243 Posts


Default








Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post

http://www.brennancenter.org/blog/br...ation-kentucky



over policing black people has its uses to the republican party.


Prosicute black people for tiny amounts of pot you let white people get away with.


they cant vote again ever in some places.



this must end
this

http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2007/2007-190.htm


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/27/bu...in&oref=slogin


S.E.C. Concedes Oversight Flaws Fueled Collapse


Edit / Delete Edit Post Quick reply to this message Reply Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Blog this Post .

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------






Today, 07:45 AM
#327 | Top


evince's Avatar

evince











evince is online now
Truthmatters



Join Date:Jul 2006Posts:45,862Thanks:4,257Thanked 6,393 Times in 4,912 Posts Groans:0 Groaned 3,579 Times in 3,243 Posts


Default








Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post

http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan...fraud-20130114






Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree

January 14, 2013|By David G. Savage

The Supreme Court refused to lift a consent decree that bars the Republican National Committee from targeting racial and ethnic minorities in its fight against voter fraud.

The Supreme Court refused to lift a consent decree that bars the Republican… (Caroyln Kaster / Associated…)


WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has refused to lift a 30-year consent decree that bars the Republican National Committee from targeting racial and ethnic minorities in its efforts to end fraudulent voting.

The justices without comment turned down an appeal from RNC lawyers who said the decree has become “antiquated” and is “increasingly used as political weapon” by Democrats during national campaigns.

For their part, lawyers for the Democratic National Committee had argued that recent campaigns show the “consent degree remains necessary today.”
this

http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2007/2007-190.htm


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/27/bu...in&oref=slogin


S.E.C. Concedes Oversight Flaws Fueled Collapse


Edit / Delete Edit Post Quick reply to this message Reply Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Blog this Post .

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------






Today, 07:47 AM
#328 | Top


evince's Avatar

evince











evince is online now
Truthmatters



Join Date:Jul 2006Posts:45,862Thanks:4,257Thanked 6,393 Times in 4,912 Posts Groans:0 Groaned 3,579 Times in 3,243 Posts


Default








Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post

http://www.nytimes.com/1986/11/01/op...integrity.html



The Measure of Republican 'Integrity'

Published: November 1, 1986



Republicans call their ''ballot integrity'' campaign a legitimate program to prevent voter fraud. Democrats say it's a ploy to reduce the participation of black voters. A memo released on the order of a Federal judge last week suggests, sadly, that the Democrats are right.

The G.O.P. program involved sending letters to registered voters in parts of Louisiana, Indiana and Missouri that cast at least 75 percent of their vote for Walter Mondale in 1984. An undeliverable letter might result in a challenge to the addressee's right to vote. Such measures are routinely, and legitimately, used to purge ineligible voters from the rolls. But the G.O.P campaign had an unfortunate hidden agenda.

Though Republican officials deny any intent to reduce black voting, the memo that surfaced in court proceedings suggests otherwise. It referred to use of the ballot integrity campaign in Louisiana, where a Republican Congressman, W. Henson Moore, was favored to win the state's open primary for the Senate seat now occupied by Russell Long, a Democrat. The Republican National Committee's Middle West regional director, Kris Wolfe, wrote to Lanny Griffith, the Southern regional director, urging adoption of the ballot integrity program before the Sept. 23 primary. ''I would guess that this program will eliminate at least 60-80,000 folks from the rolls,'' Ms. Wolfe's memo says. ''If it's a close race . . . which I'm assuming it is, this could keep the black vote down considerably.''

Thus exposed, the plan may have reverse effect. Mr. Moore failed to garner enough votes in the primary to avoid a runoff. His Democratic opponent, Representative John B. Breaux, is gaining strength. And a black electorate offended by the ballot integrity campaign could make the difference.

But the incident provokes a deeper question: What are the Republicans afraid of? Some Republicans, like Governor Kean of New Jersey and Charles Mathias, the retiring Maryland Senator, have shown how to seek and win black support. Black voters are not necessarily a monolithic, unalterably Democratic bloc. Trying to disfranchise them instead of competing for their votes reveals no integrity, just insecurity.
this

http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2007/2007-190.htm


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/27/bu...in&oref=slogin


S.E.C. Concedes Oversight Flaws Fueled Collapse


Edit / Delete Edit Post Quick reply to this message Reply Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Blog this Post .

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------






Today, 07:57 AM
#329 | Top


evince's Avatar

evince











evince is online now
Truthmatters



Join Date:Jul 2006Posts:45,862Thanks:4,257Thanked 6,393 Times in 4,912 Posts Groans:0 Groaned 3,579 Times in 3,243 Posts


Default








Quote Originally Posted by Sentistar View Post

Sorry but I don't buy that assessment from you either. If the GOP was a big failure, how come they have gained most of the governor spots, gained the Senate and the House?

Both the Democrats and the REpublicans though have been failures at running this country. A fact most voters ignore because they ignore "their" sides failures while blaming the "other" side.

Most voters are like idiotic sports fans, they only care if "their" side wins. They don't care how their side runs things when they are in power though.
geee



where did you go to?


you are not a republican right?


then why cant you condem them for all this evil?



because you are a republican and a liar

http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2007/2007-190.htm


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/27/bu...in&oref=slogin


S.E.C. Concedes Oversight Flaws Fueled Collapse
 
hey cons



If you want people to believe you when you claim your not a republican don't defend their blatant evil
 
Sentistar said:
Nope you haven't. Still waiting for you to prove you aren't a child molester. I will not communicate with child molesters like yourself.
Click to expand...

getting banned wont change the fact that you are a liar.


you want to get banned huh

because you can not face the facts
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top