Hi -- New here.

Oneuli said:
In the meantime, you should ask yourself why you obsess over the personal stuff, if you don't consider it important.
Click to expand...

You think it's important enough to keep posting, fuck-up, so ask yourself the same question, hypocrite.

Oneuli said:
I do not think that word means what you think it means.
Click to expand...

Boasting about income seems hypocritical for an SJW, sock.

Oneuli said:
I come out with an average annual income far above the median for my age.
Click to expand...
 
Grumpy said:
Jack your taste in women leaves a lot to be desired. Hell I remember you thinking Bowel was hot. :rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2:
Click to expand...

I've come here a few times when this thread is at the top of Page 1. Each time, hot babe chick is discussing something intelligent, while you and Legina are quibbling about nonsense.
Just by my limited visitation here, I think she has proven she's NOT a sock.
 
Oneuli said:
Your surrender is noted and has been enjoyed. Thanks.
Click to expand...

So you can't cite the specific DEMOCRAT policies that supposedly resulted in "lower murder rates, lower infant mortality, high life expectancy, more college degrees, higher median income, higher productivity, higher GSP per capita, lower overall crime, lower incarceration rate, lower obesity rates, etc.".

I understand why you can't.
 
Legion said:
hypocrite.
Click to expand...
I'd recommend looking that word up. You've used it incorrectly twice in a row.

Boasting about income seems hypocritical for an SJW, sock.
Click to expand...
I'm not boasting. Merely explaining why I don't consider the breaks in my project-based employment to mean I'm "unemployed." Certainly they don't entitle me to collect unemployment. But you're welcome to think of them however you'd like.
 
Oneuli said:
I'd recommend looking that word up. You've used it incorrectly twice in a row.
Click to expand...

So you say, boast-poster.

Oneuli said:
I'm not boasting. Merely explaining why I don't consider the breaks in my project-based employment to mean I'm "unemployed." Certainly they don't entitle me to collect unemployment. But you're welcome to think of them however you'd like.
Click to expand...

So you say, boast-poster. BTW, can you explain why/how you aren't entitled to " collect unemployment?"
 
Oneuli said:
With the low-res picture and the c&P cartoon glasses I put on my pic, there's not much to judge from.
Click to expand...

It's more about your responses, than your avatar. (Don't let the 'hot babe chick' distract you from what I find admirable)
 
Legion said:
So you can't cite the specific DEMOCRAT policies that supposedly resulted in "lower murder rates, lower infant mortality, high life expectancy, more college degrees, higher median income, higher productivity, higher GSP per capita, lower overall crime, lower incarceration rate, lower obesity rates, etc.".

I understand why you can't.
Click to expand...

"....the choice between expanding Medicaid or not doing so; the choice between raising the minimum wage or allowing inflation to erode it; the choice between strengthening the hand of unions or weakening it; the choice between aggressively pursuing new technologies like solar, or trying to prop up dying old industries like coal; the choice between protecting the environment or allowing industry to make the state an uninviting and unhealthy place; the choice between pro-diversity and pro-gay policies that bring in the creative class, or to side with the bigots and transform the state into a dead-end culture that can only compete in the global market by driving labor costs down; the choice between proven-effective sex ed, and abstinence-only approaches that fail terribly but placate the religious conservatives; the choice between teaching proper science and only teaching the bits that don't offend the sensibilities of Biblical literalists; the choice between effective methods for fighting crime, such as early childhood interventions and rehabilitation, and methods that fail horribly but appeal to those who enjoy seeing "those people" punished, like mass incarceration...."
 
Oneuli said:
I'll 'fess up here -- I chose the pic because I though I looked unusually good in it. I'm pretty generic in real life.
Click to expand...

hardly


I have told these guys here for over a decade I'm just an average chick


the truth seems hard for them to accept so they cant handle that
 
Oneuli said:
"....the choice between expanding Medicaid or not doing so; the choice between raising the minimum wage or allowing inflation to erode it; the choice between strengthening the hand of unions or weakening it; the choice between aggressively pursuing new technologies like solar, or trying to prop up dying old industries like coal; the choice between protecting the environment or allowing industry to make the state an uninviting and unhealthy place; the choice between pro-diversity and pro-gay policies that bring in the creative class, or to side with the bigots and transform the state into a dead-end culture that can only compete in the global market by driving labor costs down; the choice between proven-effective sex ed, and abstinence-only approaches that fail terribly but placate the religious conservatives; the choice between teaching proper science and only teaching the bits that don't offend the sensibilities of Biblical literalists; the choice between effective methods for fighting crime, such as early childhood interventions and rehabilitation, and methods that fail horribly but appeal to those who enjoy seeing "those people" punished, like mass incarceration...."
Click to expand...

Can't explain how any specific DEMOCRAT policies allegedly resulted in "lower murder rates, lower infant mortality, high life expectancy, more college degrees, higher median income, higher productivity, higher GSP per capita, lower overall crime, lower incarceration rate, lower obesity rates, etc.", I see, sock.

Post another boast. I enjoy those, hypocrite.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top