She'd have a problem with that and claim discrimination was taking place.
christiefan is one of those that something unequal isn't a problem is she agrees or supports it.
How do we solve the gender gap?
- Thread starter tsuke
- Start date
She'd have a problem with that and claim discrimination was taking place.
christiefan is one of those that something unequal isn't a problem is she agrees or supports it.
Yet on other issues when percentages don't follow the general population percentages your first thought is racism or discrimination.
Does you panic . . ?
Is that ebonics?
Your question assumes that I want what you imply I want. You can have him. Two pieces of shit should be together.
because we have to fight injustice whenever we see it. If a certain demographic is not given the opportunities that other demographics as I have shown here then we have to work to correct it.
A good step would be to support the privilege grant
because we have to fight injustice whenever we see it. If a certain demographic is not given the opportunities that other demographics as I have shown here then we have to work to correct it.
A good step would be to support the privilege grant
Your problem is that when something doesn't suit YOU and what YOU want to see, YOU automatically consider it as wrong on some level. Just because a certain demographic isn't at the level you think they should, it doesn't mean they were denied an opportunity. That's what you Liberals do. If it doesn't suit you, automatically something wrong is being done. You don't have a problem with women going to college on a higher percentage than their proportion in society but let minorities not be up to the level of their proportion in society and suddenly they are being discriminated against in your eyes. If women, who make up approximately 51% of society weren't going to college at that rate, your automatic assumption would be because they were discriminated against. When they go at a higher rate than their proportion in society, nothing to see here from your viewpoint.
My argument is that hypocrites like christiefan don't have a problem when percentages disproportionate to something else such as population are in their favor but automatically cry foul when those disproportionate percentages are not in line with what they like.
I don't have nor have ever had a problem with someone more qualified than me getting something because of it. My problem is when those who say we should be judged by what we offer rather than what we look like don't mind benefiting based on what they look like rather than what they offer. It's my sole problem with affirmative action. Those that say race, gender, etc. are wrong when used to deny don't have a problem when race, gender, etc. are used to benefit. In other words, they want the judgment to be made on content/character when they happen to be more qualified but don't mind using race, gender, etc. to benefit when they aren't.
christiefan915
Catalyst
because we have to fight injustice whenever we see it. If a certain demographic is not given the opportunities that other demographics as I have shown here then we have to work to correct it.
A good step would be to support the privilege grant
You haven't proven injustice. Maybe you're just shilling for the privilege grant.
Yet if minorities are arrested and jailed at a higher percentage than their proportion in the population, you automatically deem that as injustice. Not a single thought about it being that they commit more crimes.
57% of college population is women 43% men. We need to help minorities.
Despite men, statistically, being a minority, they aren't the kind christiefan wants to help.
christiefan915
Catalyst
Why do you equate people getting a college education with people who were denied their basic civil rights because of prejudice?
But men aren't one that christiefan would want to help.
christiefan915
Catalyst
Who gave white men only the right to define bias and how to handle it?
Why do you think equality only applies under certain circumstances and not under others? What you just said is that it's OK to deny equality when YOU don't have a problem with it.
Who gave you the right to define it?
an education is a basic civil right that is being denied due to prejudice. You cant cry foul when one group is discriminated against but cheer when another group is.
Or like the racists said about the blacks before, are you saying women are just smarter and more worthy of going to college than men?
christiefan915
Catalyst
You haven't proven prejudice. And college isn't a basic civil right, just El-Hi.
"All kids living in the United States have the right to a free public education. And the Constitution requires that all kids be given equal educational opportunity no matter what their race, ethnic background, religion, or sex, or whether they are rich or poor, citizen or non-citizen. Even if you are in this country illegally, you have the right to go to public school. The ACLU is fighting hard to make sure this right isn't taken away.
In addition to this constitutional guarantee of an equal education, many federal, state and local laws also protect students against discrimination in education based on sexual orientation or disability, including pregnancy and HIV status."
https://www.aclu.org/your-right-equality-education
equal educational opportunity no matter what their race, ethnic background, religion, or sex, or whether they are rich or poor, citizen or non-citizen.
why are we ok with such a disparity in college
the facts are there we just turn a blind eye towards it.