Humans are diverse!

Yakuda said:
I just love how you exude tolerance. I'd try to explain the irony to you but you're clearly a fucking moron.
Click to expand...

I am okay with any type of person. I am no tolerant of those who try to prevent others from being free to be who they want to be.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
no, we need to talk about why you want to hold an entire demographic of society responsible for the criminal acts of a small percentage of the population.

what's hilarious is you calling people paranoid because they believe a mass shooting could happen at a grocery store, when mass shootings HAVE happened at grocery stores........

are you proud of your ignorance?
Click to expand...

Ignorance, coupled with ultimate selfishness, is when you brush aside the leading killer of our youth because you have this overstated sense of fear of being shot in the produce section of your local grocery store. It’s always about you, you, you, isn’t it, Nancy?
 
Yakuda said:
I just love how you exude tolerance. I'd try to explain the irony to you but you're clearly a fucking moron.
Click to expand...

I live in Idaho, you fucking moron. I have tolerated people just like you my entire life.

Tolerance doesn’t mean that I don’t have a distaste for asswipes like you. Sadly, we see many on this forum, including you. What I DON’T do is support candidates that would deny you your rights and privileges as an American.

You, Jethro, are unable to say that for yourself.
 
QP! said:
As PostModernIdiot states above the right pushes a view that says 'if we cannot define marriage not just for ourselves but also for others who must follow it, then we are having your view forced on us'.
Click to expand...
we're not the idiots who demanded the government change the definition of marriage so you could marry your brother.......
 
Jarod said:
My point is this…. All this argument about men shouldn’t wear dresses and women should follow in a marriage, or marriage is only between a man and a woman are silly because what is is to be human is very flexible and transient.
Click to expand...

Another painfully moronic point. So, let me understand this, you're okay with MEN dressing up as women and destroying women's sports? You're okay with a BOY pretending to be a girl undressing in the girl's locker room?

Men who think they are women, or women who think they are men, have a mental disorder. Democrats who refuse to define what a woman is for fear it destroys their moronic narratives are not merely stupid, but incredible dishonest and destructive.

This pretense that you can be any gender you want is a sign of a mental disorder on a global scale that leads to nowhere. It is a sure sign of societal decline. Demanding that everyone agree that a man can be a woman is stupid and Fascistic.

Democrats have lost their way. They have become the party of lies, distortions, censure, Marxism and failure.
 
BidenPresident said:
"Man is born free and everywhere he is in chains." The opening sentence of Rousseau's The Social Contract not only summarises his entire philosophical system, it also proves how important he still is today.

Written in 1762, The Social Contract

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/jul/15/rousseau-shows-us-way-break-chains

The idea has been around for a while.
Click to expand...

Rousseau's narrative is naive made up malarky. But I can see why fools and halfwits would like what he says. Anyone who supplant "equal outcomes" for a meritocracy is seeking to destroy society and how it works.
 
Jarod said:
Religion is simply a belief system some chose to adopt, it should not be relevant to the law.
Click to expand...

And yet, law finds its basis in morality as a result of religion. I am amused by fools who think morality is inherent in man. It is LEARNED. It doesn't just drop out of the sky. Leftists like you place your faith in Government. That is a fool's errand. Our founders knew better.

No, it is not the "separation clause", but rather, the "establishment clause. :palm:
 
Jarod said:
I think the production of child pornography does harm to the child. The fact that the person likes child porn is not my issue with the child porn.
Click to expand...

Yet you probably support pornography in school libraries. Democrats are all in for that stuff.
 
Jarod said:
Some people are eager to make money, others could care less. Some people are eager to express themselves with art. Some are very sexual and others care not about sex, or only want one partner their entire lives, some what a bunch. Some people shave their hair while others never cut it. All of these things are acceptable, yet there is this constant idea that only my way is correct.

We see it in presidents, it was a HUGE deal that Ronald Regan was divorced.... No big deal at all that Trump was married three times and had a child out of wedlock. (Funny that both examples come from the Republican party that promotes 'traditional values'.
Click to expand...

We're going to need hip waders for all the manure you are spreading in this thread. :palm:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top