If Life Begins at Conception

Watermark said:
Fetuses also taste good and make good boots.
Click to expand...

No, they wear out too quickly to make good boots. You can make decent jewelry from the small bones, but the skin is too fragile for boots.

They taste ok when they are fresh. But its getting hard to get good fresh foeti.
 
AssHatZombie said:
Never. We also don't prosecute the hangman for KILLING prisoners, you tard. But they're still dead, aren't they, having once been alive.
Click to expand...

So you are equating a fertilized egg with someone convicted of a capital crime? Ooookay. If you are not arguing that abortion is murder then we have nothing to discuss.
 
RStringfield said:
So you are equating a fertilized egg with someone convicted of a capital crime? Ooookay. If you are not arguing that abortion is murder then we have nothing to discuss.
Click to expand...

Nothing to discuss? You don't want to swap foetus recipes?
 
RStringfield said:
So you are equating a fertilized egg with someone convicted of a capital crime? Ooookay. If you are not arguing that abortion is murder then we have nothing to discuss.
Click to expand...

Im not equating anything to anything. I illustrating how death can occur sans charges for murder. You seem to think the two go together, based on your idiotic tampon argument.
 
AssHatZombie said:
Im not equating anything to anything. I illustrating how death can occur sans charges for murder. You seem to think the two go together, based on your idiotic tampon argument.
Click to expand...

Whatever, dumbass. Let's pretend pro-lifers don't argue abortion is murder.
 
RStringfield said:
Whatever, dumbass. Let's pretend pro-lifers don't argue abortion is murder.
Click to expand...

Abortion is murder. It is the willful taking of another human life. Why do you think it's such a big deal to pro-lifer's? If an unborn human were some inanimate object like an egg, it wouldn't matter, there would be no debate or outcry. It is the fact that a fetus is a living human being, which prompts the debate.

I don't know what you have convinced yourself of here, maybe you think biology simply doesn't apply, or maybe you are in complete denial of biological facts, but you have determined a fetus is insignificant and not human life. There is no scientific basis for your assumption, it is nothing more than your own biased opinion, and refusal to accept science, coupled with your lack of ethics and morality.
 
PES Activist said:
I think a lot of confusion arises out of people conflating the biological question of when a new individual life is created (fertilisation, implantation - whatever you're having yourself) with the question of when human and legal rights are established for an individual.
.
Click to expand...

QFT....

THAT is exactly where the problem occurs. THAT is why the argument should not be "IS it human or not" and the argument should be "Should we extend human rights to an unborn child or not"?
 
RStringfield said:
When has the state prosecuted someone for "killing" a fertilized egg?
Click to expand...

The fact that they have not, does not change the SCIENTIFIC FACT that an abortion ends a unique human life. The fact that people such as yourself have dehumanized the unborn child to the point that it is acceptable to kill it and pretend it is nothing more than a 'clump of cells' doesn't change the FACT that is a unique innocent human life that you are deliberately ending.
 
Its simply amazing the hoops liberals, ie Democrats, will jump through to justify killing a human being in its earliest stages of development....redefining words and spinning definitions to advance a political agenda....
 
bravo said:
Its simply amazing the hoops liberals, ie Democrats, will jump through to justify killing a human being in its earliest stages of development....redefining words and spinning definitions to advance a political agenda....
Click to expand...


It's all for the improvement of the collective. Lots of people should die so the more superior can thrive better.
 
bravo said:
Its simply amazing the hoops liberals, ie Democrats, will jump through to justify killing a human being in its earliest stages of development....redefining words and spinning definitions to advance a political agenda....
Click to expand...

That's not true. I do believe in an irrevocable right to life. I just believe that right starts around the 18th month of pregnancy, not conception.
 
Watermark said:
That's not true. I do believe in an irrevocable right to life. I just believe that right starts around the 18th month of pregnancy, not conception.
Click to expand...

18th month of pregnancy? So the third child gets irrevocable rights to life?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top