Morons like Jarod and Poor Richard can't tell you. They don't know. They think that salacious hearsay and some innocuous emails present this massive criminal conspiracy that Bragg cannot seem to define. Yes, they really are that retarded.
Is a man who hired a hitman to kill his wife guilty?
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Morons like Jarod and Poor Richard can't tell you. They don't know. They think that salacious hearsay and some innocuous emails present this massive criminal conspiracy that Bragg cannot seem to define. Yes, they really are that retarded.
That is a misdemeanor whose Statute of Limitations have long run out. Trump cannot be charged with that you insufferable moron.
Try again.
Yakuda
Verified User
LMAO I love how easily you people get pissed off. It's almost too easy
Did Cohen submit receipts?
Id never tell a woman to get an abortion.
Paying Stormy Daniels is not illegal.
Yakuda
Verified User
But you support her right to get one. Same result Einstein
NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
Wouldn't that largely depend on just how annoying the wife is?
I see you have decided to agree that your original post was bullshit, Poopiehead since you agree that it is wrong to pay someone for legal work if they did no legal work and it is wrong to pay an invoice to someone if they did no work.
If Trump didn't have sex with Stormy then I guess he will testify to that under oath. No. He won't because perjury is a crime.
If Cohen did legal work then I am sure that the defense will provide evidence of that work. No. They won't because no such evidence exists. If they had such evidence they could have provided it during their motion to dismiss and the case would have been dismissed.
Cohen said the payments were a reimbursement. The paperwork with Wiesselberg's notations on it show that the payment was a reimbursement and not for legal work. I guess Trump can get on the stand and testify he knew nothing about it. No. He won't because perjury is a crime.
Here is the document that shows the payment was a reimbursement with a $50,000 bonus and doubled to cover income taxes.
The defense is free to subpoena Weisselberg if that isn't his handwriting on the document. No, they won't because perjury is a crime that Weisselberg has already been convicted of trying to lie to protect Trump.
OMG, Poopiehead. You should be Trump's lawyer since you know so little about the laws.
Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.
2022 New York Laws :: PEN - Penal :: Part 3 - Specific Offenses :: Title K - Offenses Involving Fraud :: Article 175 - Offenses Involving False Written Statements :: 175.10 - Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree.
Justia Free Databases of US Laws, Codes & Statutes
law.justia.com
Pissed off?
Why would I be pissed off because you are incapable retaining information that is given to you. I have sympathy for you for having the condition you do. I hope you see a doctor for it.
OMG, Poopiehead. You should be Trump's lawyer since you know so little about the laws.
Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.
2022 New York Laws :: PEN - Penal :: Part 3 - Specific Offenses :: Title K - Offenses Involving Fraud :: Article 175 - Offenses Involving False Written Statements :: 175.10 - Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree.
Justia Free Databases of US Laws, Codes & Statutes
Fascinating, I haven't seen a single shred of evidence to support this claim. Of course, you being a lying leftist moron, you see evidence because MSNBC told you so.
MORON ALERT!!!!
That really should be your signature, Poopiehead, so everyone can recognize you for what you are without having to read your posts.MORON ALERT!!!
Yakuda
Verified User
Did Cohen submit receipts for reimbursement? You seemed to skip over that part didn't you dipshit? Now answer the question.
Yes, you are a moron, poopiehead, since you claimed the law didn't exist and now have retreated to you haven't seen evidence when you have not been in court.
It's nice of you to start signifying your posts with that so people can easily recognize you for what you are.
You might want to not mention the lack of a receipt since it only further proves the crime.
Reimbursement without receipts and without notating in the business records that it was a reimbursement would look like a false entry, don't you think?
anonymoose
Classical Liberal
I certainly am not. If he’s found guilty, do you think this will have any impact on the election other than it could actually enhance trump’s chances?
NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
If the pigfucker Trump is found guilty, his repugnantly corrupt SCOTUS will overturn the conviction.