Without using religion, explain why it isn't wrong.
That is wrong. We don't need meat to survive.
Animals are not the only form of life. In order to eat, whether vegetable or animal products one must take life."It doesn't matter what you eat, until we can synthesize all nourishment we will always have to kill to eat."
But we don't have to kill animals now.
"I do...and most people who lack meat in their diet have way more medical problems...just a fact! Of course those who are gluttonous with meat products also have way more medical problems too!"
That is not a fact!
Different may mean varelse, not necessarily unintelligent life. The idea that all intelligence will be found in meat creatures may just be an arrogance that we may find woefully incorrect.Yeah, but now we don't have to kill animals. And plants are way different than animals.
Yeah, but now we don't have to kill animals. And plants are way different than animals.
Plants don't feel pain or resemble us at all.
Have you ever asked a plant?
Plants don't feel pain or resemble us at all.
Dispite research agreeing with me, no I haven't. I just assumed the plant wouldn't hear me and understand my question.
This may be incorrect. Some studies show they even have memories for specific people.Plants don't feel pain or resemble us at all.
What type of response Battleborne?
"So only things that can scream and make us feel bad have feeling?"
Until you prove that plants are aware of their surroundings like an animal or feel physical pain, then no.